• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NOSFERATU teaser trailer released - Robert Eggers - Dec 25

jason10mm

Gold Member
There’s not that much sex in it.

There’s two sex scenes, they’re not lengthy though especially the second one.
And DAMN I was hoping for some les action as well....but nope. This is the LEAST erotic vampire story in quite a while. The bit of nudity is has is well placed
 

Valedix

Member
John Candy No GIF by Laff


But I can edit it.
No worries lol thanks for the info though.
 
Thought the movie is a bit overrated.
Some brief thoughts and what I think I would have wanted instead in this outing.

Orlock looks and sounds ridiculous. I get it, old Transylvanian noblemen had Dr. Robotnik mustaches, but shit looked dumb.

ATJ continues to be a vampire in his films sucking all charisma and soul out of scenes. Fucking his dead wife is some shit. Wish she came back to life with her kiddos to finish him off.

So I think what would have worked for me? If Eggers made a folk lore vampire movie that didn’t have to hit all the Dracula/Nosferatu bullet points. If this was an original story that just took place in that time period, about a folk lore vampire in some town in the middle of the Carpathian Mountains that you as an audience member haven’t seen 100’s of times before would have been more beneficial to the actors, story and creature design.

You ever see Black Sabbath? Think “The Wurdulak”
 
Last edited:
Thought the movie is a bit overrated.
Some brief thoughts and what I think I would have wanted instead in this outing.

Orlock looks and sounds ridiculous. I get it, old Transylvanian noblemen had Dr. Robotnik mustaches, but shit looked dumb.

ATJ continues to be a vampire in his films sucking all charisma and soul out of scenes. Fucking his dead wife is some shit. Wish she came back to life with her kiddos to finish him off.

So I think what would have worked for me? If Eggers made a folk lore vampire movie that didn’t have to hit all the Dracula/Nosferatu bullet points. If this was an original story that just took place in that time period, about a folk lore vampire in some town in the middle of the Carpathian Mountains that you as an audience member haven’t seen 100’s of times before would have been more beneficial to the actors, story and creature design.

You ever see Black Sabbath? Think “The Wurdulak”
I've seen it twice now and unfortunately I agree with you but would be harsher on it.

I really tried with the new Orlok look but it just doesn't fucking work for me after they take him out of the shadows. He looks fantastic during the initial night encounter. Totally obscured in the shadows. The more they show him directly, the less his look works and by the end I found myself actively finding him ridiculous. Is it accurate? Yes and it was a cool idea. But it doesn't work in practice for me because we're left with something like zombie Frank Zappa meets Mendez from Resident Evil 4. They try so hard to make him absurdly "scary" that they lose the gaunt wraith aspect. When he bursts out of his coffin with that ridiculous mustache and his cock out and jacked, he just looks like a typical Hollywood Horror villain but sillier. It's extremely disappointing to me. We already have a thousand of those and didn't need Nosferatu to be that.

I found the acting all over the place and incoherent. Ralph Ineson, as always, was on fucking point. Everyone else ranged from serviceable to annoying. AJT seemed to be in some off-Broadway play, Dafoe seemed to be in a different movie tonally when in scenes with Ineson, Hoult was adequate and Depp actively annoying half the time. She seemed to do her best attempt at an Adjani impression most of the time and then going pure modern Horror schlock with the "possession" bits. ATJ was a real highlight of what the fuck is this guy doing.

One of the worst parts for me was the uninspired, generic cacophony they called a score. 90% of it was cheap audial jump scare swells...over and over. The movie often lacked feel and real tension to me so it felt like they constantly tried to create it with overbearing, blaring "spooky orchestra". Compare that to Herzog's use of Wagner for the castle ascent and how memorable that is.

I could go on and on. I don't think it's a horrible movie all in all but man, I found it surprisingly disappointing coming from a guy who has ranted about doing it justice and all his entire career. Some of his choices, including the cheesy digital filters on the city at night etc., feel so goofy coming from The Lighthouse guy.

PS: Fucking love Bava and especially Black Sabbath and The Wurdulak.
 
Caught a screening earlier this morning and thought it was OK. Not a bad film but not great either. Doesn't hold a candle to The VVitch in my opinion.
 

GymWolf

Member
Is the main actress any good or it's another case of hollywood nepotism?

I think i saw her in something else and i was rather unimpressed but i could remember wrong...
 

Billbofet

Member
I mentioned this in the other thread, but I was pretty disappointed by this one.
I saw it with some friends, and one had to wake me up three times as I just couldn't stay engaged/awake.
 
This sounds like The Northman Pt2 : an OK film with OK/good acting and good cinematography that unfortunately, isn't particularly memorable nor that good compared to his previous films (The witch/The lighthouse).

Again, maybe he wanted to do this film since the witch, but, as soon as the Hollywood mega bucks start rolling in, the fire inside and vision starts going sideways for all the obvious reasons...

I was expecting it tbh after The Northman 🤔
 

Kacho

Gold Member

Madflavor

Member
This sounds like The Northman Pt2 : an OK film with OK/good acting and good cinematography that unfortunately, isn't particularly memorable nor that good compared to his previous films (The witch/The lighthouse).

Again, maybe he wanted to do this film since the witch, but, as soon as the Hollywood mega bucks start rolling in, the fire inside and vision starts going sideways for all the obvious reasons...

I was expecting it tbh after The Northman 🤔

Your mileage may vary. There's no agreed consensus ranking on Robert Eggers films. Gaf obviously doesn't seem hot on the film, but a lot of people including myself loved it. You won't know until you see it for yourself. There are people in this thread that loved The Northman or disliked it. Nosferatu's no different.
 

8bitpill

Member
In a sea of garbage that has come out since the start of the 21st century, this is a gem.

I went and watched it on New Years Eve and throughly enjoyed it.

The reason something like this is over rated is because it's a film and not a movie (there is a difference). A lot of people don't dive deep into films at times, due to the pacing, they lose interest, don't get it, or it's too artsy. But when they see a film and can appreciate what is there, they will rave about it.

You either like Eggers work or you don't, not much in-between.

One thing that can be said about his films, he doesn't conform to today's standards of injecting demographics into his time period pieces that wouldn't culturally make sense (regardless if it's a fantasy or not). You can tell these are passion projects for him, he thankfully isn't pressured by the producers or studios to make these films all inclusive.


2125a8449ed2992ff4fbefa42725b37815a70ece.gif
 

Days like these...

Have a Blessed Day
I'm starting to think the guy is a hack. The Witch is the only movie of his I've liked of his. Didn't like the Northman or Lighthouse. I've decided to skip Nosferatu from the impressions I've gotten on here.
 

Mr Reasonable

Completely Unreasonable
it's a film and not a movie
That is what I felt too, that it was a "proper" film.

I didn't think it was the greatest thing I've ever seen, but it still felt like a piece of work that had been created with a particular standard in mind.

If that sounds too pretentious, and you're not sure if you'll like it, you probably won't! That would be my guess anyway.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
In a sea of garbage that has come out since the start of the 21st century, this is a gem.

I went and watched it on New Years Eve and throughly enjoyed it.

The reason something like this is over rated is because it's a film and not a movie (there is a difference). A lot of people don't dive deep into films at times, due to the pacing, they lose interest, don't get it, or it's too artsy. But when they see a film and can appreciate what is there, they will rave about it.

You either like Eggers work or you don't, not much in-between.

One thing that can be said about his films, he doesn't conform to today's standards of injecting demographics into his time period pieces that wouldn't culturally make sense (regardless if it's a fantasy or not). You can tell these are passion projects for him, he thankfully isn't pressured by the producers or studios to make these films all inclusive.


2125a8449ed2992ff4fbefa42725b37815a70ece.gif
Fair enough, but it's also a bit of a cop out to that illogical jumps in continuity and call it a "dream-like unreliable narrator". I feel like this film in particular suffered from editing room shenanigans that just couldn't have been intended while shooting. The whole film has a disjointed sense of time that is unnecessary.
 
Man, not gonna lie, the fact that they kept Orlok's looks under wraps made me really curious and hype levels were through the roof, and since i won't be seeing this in cinemas I just had to take a look online, sure, i spoiled it but curiosity got the better of me, in case anyone else is also curious :

It's OK, I expected way worse after the "lolz pornstache !"
 

Madflavor

Member
I respect and love the choice on Eggers part to make Count Orlok actually look like how a Central European Nobleman looked like in the 16th/17th Century. We've seen the bald head, pointy eared ghoul look many times already. Orlok's design in the 2024 version makes is stand on it's own more.

xs72rYp.png


People also shit on Dracula's "Butt Hair" design in Dracula 1992. But giving him that Geisha looking hairstyle and robes once again helped a story that's been told many times before, stand apart from all the other adaptations. Both Dracula 1992 and Nosferatu 2024 ooze with visual storytelling and style, and some things like the authentic 16th Century Nobleman look for Orlok will help this film stand the test of time. It's a different take on the Count. In this film he's clearly supposed to be an ancient lord who was corrupted by dark magic, rather than a demon that crossed over.
 
Last edited:
Man, not gonna lie, the fact that they kept Orlok's looks under wraps made me really curious and hype levels were through the roof, and since i won't be seeing this in cinemas I just had to take a look online, sure, i spoiled it but curiosity got the better of me, in case anyone else is also curious :

It's OK, I expected way worse after the "lolz pornstache !"

You get a glimpse of the OrCock as well early in the movie and looks like the count does a bit of weed whacking in his spare time down there.

All good and well cause Lily Rose Depp is fine AF.
 
Last edited:

DKehoe

Gold Member
Fair enough, but it's also a bit of a cop out to that illogical jumps in continuity and call it a "dream-like unreliable narrator". I feel like this film in particular suffered from editing room shenanigans that just couldn't have been intended while shooting. The whole film has a disjointed sense of time that is unnecessary.
I disagree that it's a cop out. In various sections, the film is going for a dream like state and leaves you questioning what was real and what wasn't. If it didn't work for you then that's fine. But the antagonist is explicitly messing with the character's dreams and so the story is operating on that level. So that disjointed sense of time is very much part of the story.
 

Oberstein

Member
The movie Nosferatu, directed by Robert Eggers, was a big surprise hit in 2024. It came out during the busy Christmas season when many other movies were released. Despite the competition, it performed really well.


It had the best opening ever for Focus Features and quickly became the most successful movie in Eggers’ career. After just one week, it hit a major box office milestone and is now one of the top horror movies of the year.


The movie Nosferatu has made over $50 million in the U.S., which is something only five horror movies did in 2024. It’s about to beat Terrifier 3’s total of $53 million, making it one of the top five horror movies of the year.



a2f688ced227cf773727a1c278556fb2c9ca0af1.gif
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
I disagree that it's a cop out. In various sections, the film is going for a dream like state and leaves you questioning what was real and what wasn't. If it didn't work for you then that's fine. But the antagonist is explicitly messing with the character's dreams and so the story is operating on that level. So that disjointed sense of time is very much part of the story.
Eh, the stuff with Thomas in europe or whatever was ok, but once the plague ship hit the city the entire narrative took a massive dump on continuity, flow of time, and cohesion. Felt like it was something done in the editing room because they didn't have the footage they needed or it was all just too boring and they had to scrap most of it.
 

DKehoe

Gold Member
Eh, the stuff with Thomas in europe or whatever was ok, but once the plague ship hit the city the entire narrative took a massive dump on continuity, flow of time, and cohesion. Felt like it was something done in the editing room because they didn't have the footage they needed or it was all just too boring and they had to scrap most of it.
Once the plague kicks in you have people not sleeping for days in a row and their dreams being twisted. So I think it makes sense to keep up that fevered, fractured sense of time and reality. But again, if it didn't work for you that's fair enough.
 
Man, not gonna lie, the fact that they kept Orlok's looks under wraps made me really curious and hype levels were through the roof, and since i won't be seeing this in cinemas I just had to take a look online, sure, i spoiled it but curiosity got the better of me, in case anyone else is also curious :

It's OK, I expected way worse after the "lolz pornstache !"

The first moments you encounter the character with him lurking in the darkness is awesome. I too didn't expect that character design when you see him up close. I dunno, I kind of expected to see an otherworldly being. Either way I enjoyed the movie and I will watch it again. I must say I enjoyed the first half of the movie more than the 2nd half.
 

Roufianos

Member
I thought the first half was super intense and atmospheric then the quality really dropped in the 2nd. Definitely a memorable cinema experience though.

Might rent it to record dem titties on a horse 🤤
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom