Buggy Loop
Member
Gamers are f-d as Jensen is free to charge whatever he wants basically. 5080 is going to be $1,200 again, isn’t it?
Dunno
Is AMD or Intel gonna compete?
Gamers are f-d as Jensen is free to charge whatever he wants basically. 5080 is going to be $1,200 again, isn’t it?
Maybe, but that’s not going to be enough for at least a few years.Dunno
Is AMD or Intel gonna compete?
Not anytime soonDunno
Is AMD or Intel gonna compete?
Not anytime soon
Battlemage, which is now reported to be delayed to 2025, was always going to be midrange parts only
RDNA4 is apparently on schedule but was previously leaked as being midrange parts only
The Lovelace successor, which is apparently on track for early 2025, will again hold the high end market uncontested. You will pay whatever Jensen charges for your 5090, and you will like it, because neither AMD nor Intel are planning on competing with it
Honestly just buy some fucking NVDA stock and use your profits from it to buy video cards, I've been doing this since circa 2012. Yes, my very first NVDA shares I ever bought was back in 2012
Did Valve ever talk about third parties doing Steamdecks for them, basically what the plan with Steam Machines back then was. Maybe Nvidia could do their version of a Steamdeck with Steam OS on it. I guess porting this Linux fork from x86 to ARM isn't impossible since the core Linux runs on almost everything anyway and that would immediately be more proper game ready than Android. Question is how custom the OS is to survive such a CPU swap or if that would require some serious work from either Nvidia or again Valve.What CPU would it use? Nvidia doesn’t have an SoC unless it goes ARM and then it won’t be able to play those games.
They could produce a competent Android device , but for what purpose? Android tablets aren’t the hottest market and a handheld won’t be able to play majority of Windows games.
4k+RT can still be a challenge for the 4090.The problem is the 4090 is so far ahead of all consoles, that even when you max out a multiplatform release, you're still miles ahead in resolution and frame-rate, whilst having higher graphics settings. So where is there for the 5090 to go?
Regardless of what they call it, the full 103 die (i.e the current 4080 Super) will most likely be $1600 with 24GB of RAM. Various cutdowns of the 102 dies will start at $2000 for 24GB and extend to $3000 for the AI creator friendly 48GB varient. In other words they will again push the product stack : price ratio down another tier, like they did with the 4XXXs. #Gamers have demonstated they're happy to pay the premium, and AMDs not even feigning a high end competitor next gen.Gamers are f-d as Jensen is free to charge whatever he wants basically. 5080 is going to be $1,200 again, isn’t it?
Regardless of what they call it, the full 103 die (i.e the current 4080 Super) will most likely be $1600 with 24GB of RAM. Various cutdowns of the 102 dies will start at $2000 for 24GB and extend to $3000 for the AI creator friendly 48GB varient. In other words they will again push the product stack : price ratio down another tier, like they did with the 4XXXs. #Gamers have demonstated they're happy to pay the premium, and AMDs not even feigning a high end competitor next gen.
Ultimately meaningless as AMD will still be inferior in RT and feature set, and that will be very close to the street price of used or clearance 4080 Supers and whatever they decide to call the $600 5070 varient.This is what I am afraid of. Let’s see what AMD does as the current rumor is that AMD will have 4080 level card for $500-600.
If developing a new GPU were that easy, everyone would be doing it. Watching AMD struggle for 20 years and Intel try to enter the market, it's clear that Nvidia's got a pretty significant technological lead on any would be competitors. If you earned your monopoly by constantly having superior technology and by constantly improving your technology, that's really hard to complain about.
Again?? You must be dreamin. It will be obviously more expensive than the 4090.Gamers are f-d as Jensen is free to charge whatever he wants basically. 5080 is going to be $1,200 again, isn’t it?
5080 shouldn’t be more expensive vs 4090 unless Nvidia completely lost their marbles.Again?? You must be dreamin. It will be obviously more expensive than the 4090.
We shall see. A $500 card with somewhat competitive performance to a 4080 will sell a decent amount.Ultimately meaningless as AMD will still be inferior in RT and feature set, and that will be very close to the street price of used or clearance 4080 Supers and whatever they decide to call the $600 5070 varient.
There is no such thing as overkill on PC. We can always find ways to stress cards to their limit.Simple answer don't buy their top cards at prices you don't like. 4090 is overkill in almost all scenarios.
Pissed about what? They said, this is the price. You said, OK I'll buy it. Both sides agreed to the price. That's how it works. What Nvidia makes off each sale is ultimately irrelevant to the buyer, who has already done their own cost-benefit analysis and decided the price was worth paying.
Lol. Year after year always the same rumor and this rumor never come true. It will be like always, if AMD release a card with a similar performance they also sell it to a similar price.Let’s see what AMD does as the current rumor is that AMD will have 4080 level card for $500-600.
AMD's market cap at the moment is 265 billion, while Nvidia's market cap is 1.6 trillion dollars. Actually, it seems that the Nvidia market cap has gone up from 500 billion to 1.6 trillion in a year! Amazing.
I hear it got delayed to next year.Just reveal the next Shield with tegra