alabtrosMyster
Member
We haad to wait until the iPhone to finally get an iPod killer.You always hear that just like you always hear about them having an NVIDIA killer coming up.
We haad to wait until the iPhone to finally get an iPod killer.You always hear that just like you always hear about them having an NVIDIA killer coming up.
If you look at vast majority of pre-builds and all laptop GPUs, it's all Nvidia.We are just believing this completely outlandish claim? Based on what exactly?
Pretty sure some quick check through bestseller lists in multiple online shops will tell quite a different story...
These numbers are complete horseshit, again, check for yourself, pick a handful of big retailers and look at the best sellers list. Of course Nvidia has bigger market share, but in no reality these numbers are correct. Even the Steam survey which is skewed towards Nvidia over-representation due to net cafes in China and such, has AMD comfortably with double digits market share.If you look at vast majority of pre-builds and all laptop GPUs, it's all Nvidia.
People actually buying GPUs separately isn't the majority of the market.
Gaming is a rounding error in regards to the marketshare on this chart. The reason Nvidia marketshare is jumping isn't because of gaming revenue or sales from retailers. It's because of datacenters. A good chunk of that jump in marketshare is purely because of B2B sales where businesses buy giant fucking stocks of them to generate anime AI porn, drain the planet of water, and steal voice actors' sonic likenesses.These numbers are complete horseshit, again, check for yourself, pick a handful of big retailers and look at the best sellers list. Of course Nvidia has bigger market share, but in no reality these numbers are correct. Even the Steam survey which is skewed towards Nvidia over-representation due to net cafes in China and such, has AMD comfortably with double digits market share.
Let's just be a bit more critical before trusting such outlandish claims.
Again, look at the big pre-build vendors, HP, Dell, Lenovo. They don't have many models (if any) with AMD RDNA 4 cards and there are NO mobile discrete AMD RDNA GPUs.These numbers are complete horseshit, again, check for yourself, pick a handful of big retailers and look at the best sellers list. Of course Nvidia has bigger market share, but in no reality these numbers are correct. Even the Steam survey which is skewed towards Nvidia over-representation due to net cafes in China and such, has AMD comfortably with double digits market share.
Let's just be a bit more critical before trusting such outlandish claims.
John Peddie Research have been the primary provider of those numbers for years and give the most up to date and accurate info and they have access to data no one else does. They're used by channels like Gamers Nexus among others. GN has also commented on this.These numbers are complete horseshit, again, check for yourself, pick a handful of big retailers and look at the best sellers list. Of course Nvidia has bigger market share, but in no reality these numbers are correct. Even the Steam survey which is skewed towards Nvidia over-representation due to net cafes in China and such, has AMD comfortably with double digits market share.
Let's just be a bit more critical before trusting such outlandish claims.
And AMD is going to fix that situation with Magnus, and the rest of the Xbox platforms.Again, look at the big pre-build vendors, HP, Dell, Lenovo. They don't have many models (if any) with AMD RDNA 4 cards and there are NO mobile discrete AMD RDNA GPUs.
I don't know how accurate 94% is, but pre-builds and laptops make up the biggest share of the market.
having superior AI performance in an era of AI will do that to a gpu brand. AMD can improve FSR4 and raytracing all they want (which they have) but the real money is in the datacenters where Nvidia stays king
.... That bubble's gotta pop any day now.
If you purposely buy anything Radeon you are not going to dabble in anything ML or AI related with that card since the performance is so terrible its basically irrelevant anyways. Local AI, image gen, whatever the fuck, its not going to work there. Might as well give it up.And even at consumer level I don't think things like wan 2.2 even work on AMD hardware.
In the DIY segment, AMD was doing well, very competitive with nvidia sales
To be fair, local model performance has been improving with AMD, but it's not at Nvidia or even MAC level.If you purposely buy anything Radeon you are not going to dabble in anything ML or AI related with that card since the performance is so terrible its basically irrelevant anyways. Local AI, image gen, whatever the fuck, its not going to work there. Might as well give it up.
To anyone who actually cares about local AI generation any tax or additional cost Nvidia puts on their hardware is basically nothing since no other GPU can do what Geforce does when it comes to ML and AI.
I doubt it'll ever reach Nvidia levels and honestly I'm hoping on that. Nvidia can keep their dominance on that soulless datacenter AI shit. It hasn't even been mainstream for 3 years and already consumers are fucking tired of it- but since businesses and shareholders like it we're gonna keep being gaslit into thinking it's the new cool tech thing for the next 15+ yearsTo be fair, local model performance has been improving with AMD
Idiots and their fake msrp. Should've stuck with $599.Huh, I thought AMD was supposed to be on the upswing?
nice, so means that nvidia gpu is going to get even more expensive in the future.PCMR is going to be very happy for the VIP treatment here.
Didn't actually spend an hour to read the actual study, did you? That MIT study was a terrible study. It was more an advertisement to steer attention toward their NANDA initiative than a true evaluation of the success of AI in the enterprise. They intentionally solicited participants who had troubled implementations and they only interviewed about 50 of the 150 leaders they surveyed.The technology is viable, but the usage is very questionable, and the running costs are well... insane. Investors are selling AI as the next revolution like the Internet but the biggest potential seems to be as crack for lonely people and internet memes. Generative AI is likely not going to be transformative as people think but it certainly came to stay. The next biggest revolution will be robotics in maybe 25-30 years.
It actually can, depends on a couple factors.
AMD really needs to get their shit together and win over the gaming market
Probably even less likely.That is as likely as Xbox winning the console market
Eh, 9070XT is on par with 5070Ti and mostly cheaper by $100+. It's a good card.NVidia are just that far ahead in terms of their product, frankly. If you want ray tracing or AI upscaling - which is mandatory for modern titles on PC at this point - then you can't buy AMD. They need to catch up to these core offerings from NVidia, who've given them plenty of time, frankly.
still cant run mh wilds properly keklolAnd Sony / AMD will still be playing catch up with Nvidia like they have for years and years. Can't wait to see Cerny sauce frame gen get hyped up on here then come out 5 steps behind Nvidia like PSSR.
![]()
It's cheaper by $50. The 5070 Ti can be found at its $750 MSRP and the cheapest 9070 XT is $700, $100 above its advertised MSRP.Eh, 9070XT is on par with 5070Ti and mostly cheaper by $100+. It's a good card.
John Peddie Research have been the primary provider of those numbers for years and give the most up to date and accurate info and they have access to data no one else does. They're used by channels like Gamers Nexus among others. GN has also commented on this.
They're as legit as legit gets. They're not some random firm.
Didn't actually spend an hour to read the actual study, did you? That MIT study was a terrible study. It was more an advertisement to steer attention toward their NANDA initiative than a true evaluation of the success of AI in the enterprise. They intentionally solicited participants who had troubled implementations and they only interviewed about 50 of the 150 leaders they surveyed.
It is impossible to infer what that attention grabbing headline is inferring from a sample size that small.
What the article doesn't mention, but the survey does, is that underground adoption and use of AI tools by employees using personal subscriptions to help perform their work is accelerating. So there is a market for the technology, just not the way about 150 or so companies surveyed tried to do it. The study finds that there's more business utility in a $20 per month subscription than expensive enterprise AI tools. In no way does the study infer that AI is failing and that a bubble is about to burst.
MIT draws the conclusion that AI adoption is going to continue to grow, but the direction it is going to take is a decentralized "agentic AI internet" model. Which just so happens to be what NANDA is all about. Funny how things turn out that way.
Patiently waiting for Redstone.RDNA4 products are good. However, they put on a facade when they claimed that unlike NVIDIA, they had volume and their MSRPs were real. Turns out it was true only for the first batch and by the second round, their products were either out of stock or massively more expensive than announced. This soured a lot of people and their lack of volume effectively stopped them from gaining any market share.
I wonder how the future Xbox is going to show on Steam surveys. That will be interesting to compare console to PC GPU population.Steam hardware survey is about 17.5% AMD GPUs.
I think with Magnus, AMD's goal is to take over the pre built PC market, including gaming laptops.
I am. I bought a PS5 Pro.Remember everyone saying they were boycotting Nvidia?
![]()
Sure if you believe Average RedditorsHuh, I thought AMD was supposed to be on the upswing?
r/AMD is so hilarious about this behavior, I laugh every timeWe are just believing this completely outlandish claim? Based on what exactly?
Pretty sure some quick check through bestseller lists in multiple online shops will tell quite a different story...
Friendly reminder that the CEO of NVIDIA and the CEO of AMD are cousins (once removed):
![]()
Are AMD CEO Lisa Su and Nvidia’s Jensen Huang Related?
Lisa Su and Jensen Huang are both first-generation Americans from Taiwan. Turns out they are also related.observer.com
Seems like having a single family helming the two biggest players in a market would be an opportunity for collusion, but they say they never met until recently.
Intel just hired the people behind the Linux open source driver for Apple M1 to work on Arc drivers.I think the hope we had for intel has faded now. With their current issues, new GPUs are probably all but dead.
How's DLSS perform on it? Therein lies the problem.Eh, 9070XT is on par with 5070Ti and mostly cheaper by $100+. It's a good card.
FSR4 is solid.How's DLSS perform on it? Therein lies the problem.
Other | 0.36% |
Intel | 7.44% |
AMD | 17.32% |
NVIDIA | 74.88% |
Everyone says that AMD offers much more value for the same amount of money, but the real truth is, most people don't care about that - they only buy what gives better graphics, and more fps.Huh, I thought AMD was supposed to be on the upswing?
Anti-Lag. Its usage doesn't seem as widespread though. I practically never hear about it.Does AMD have a equivalent to Reflex thats gets shipped in many games. Does it ger turned on as an invisible setting when using AMD's Frame Gen?
Anti-Lag. Its usage doesn't seem as widespread though. I practically never hear about it.