SyenceLabb
Member
This is really dumb.
1. Because it's possible for law and order to exist without cops. We know this since this is the form all primitive societies took.
2. Because "deterrence" is less responsible for crime rates than you think. Criminals, especially serious crime, don't actually expect to be caught and thus are not deterred. "Deterrence" exists primarily in the minds of non-criminal laymen, and for only a few cases of petty crime like shoplifting, and in that case it's not even the cops creating the deterrence, but the employees and the force of the law.
1) This isn't a primitive society. Primitive societies worked in clans and were too busy preoccupied with simple survival. A modern day society with 300+ million diverse individuals without a police force? I hope you love vigilante justice and the reemergence of organized crime families providing your protection.
2) The effectiveness of police deterrence is definitely open for debate, but I'm willing to bet burglary and illegal trespass would increase a tad if we seen a draw down of the police force.