Depends, they can put his executive assistant on the stand and she will spill everything since she was the one communicating from Russia to Trump.To be clear, I hate Trump and don't think this will bring him down. His son on the other hand ...
Depends, they can put his executive assistant on the stand and she will spill everything since she was the one communicating from Russia to Trump.To be clear, I hate Trump and don't think this will bring him down. His son on the other hand ...
Yes. That is a federal crime. Solicitation from a federal government.As someone who's just jumping in here...
Isn't the implication that he was told that it was coming from an official source (from a foreign government), and that wasn't flagged or reported to relevant authorities, a legal issue in itself?
I agree.
Personally I think posting fake tweets in these threads should be ban worthy.
I'm tempted to block everyone posting them.
I posted it because it was a diverging opinion on the legal ramifications of the event. Right now, it seems everyone who hates Trump seem to think that this will bring him down. This guy had a different legal view on it so I thought it might be interesting to discuss it.
The constitution is a fatally flawed document so you will never have any laws that would protect against this shit. One side would clearly stick to the fake news narrative so they have no incentive to elevate the level of discourse because they need their poorly educated base to stay dumb.
I fundamentally agree with the first part here. Having "the oldest constitution in the world" isn't a barge of honor, it's a cause of countless legal problems. But there are still roads that could be taken to make it easier to persecute and fine news outlets for making obvious false or misleading reports.
I fundamentally agree with the first part here. Having "the oldest constitution in the world" isn't a barge of honor, it's a cause of countless legal problems. But there are still roads that could be taken to make it easier to persecute and fine news outlets for making obvious false or misleading reports.
A source with knowledge of the investigation tells me that IC had "ears on" Russian lawyer. The meeting was recorded. Donald, Jr is toast.
The majority of us are aware that it's a slow process (although yes, some think he will somehow be magically impeached in an instant).I feel like I'm in a weird position sometimes just in that I recognize that these kinds of stories absolutely are a big deal and help to build the case against Trump, but also recognize that this is a slow, arduous process that won't yield the desired results quickly, and may never pay off completely.
Yes. That is a federal crime. Solicitation from a federal government.
I know it is Claude Taylor and all, but still:
https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/884509836708376576
Sure.I know it is Claude Taylor and all, but still:
https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/884509836708376576
I know it is Claude Taylor and all, but still:
https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/884509836708376576
I feel like I'm in a weird position sometimes just in that I recognize that these kinds of stories absolutely are a big deal and help to build the case against Trump, but also recognize that this is a slow, arduous process that won't yield the desired results quickly, and may never pay off completely.
I think many people dismiss these things out of hand by saying "this isn't THE story to end it all" but in reality, we aren't going to know that until we have the benefit of hindsight.
Many people said that the Comey firing was "nothing important", and one week later were saying "SEE, he's still President". But at the same time can you really honestly say that today?
Can anyone really honestly say that about the Comey Memos?
In hindsight both of those moments are important turning points in public opinion and the investigation in general, and are certainly NOT "nothing".
This is likely to be similar.
Yes Donald Trump is likely to still be President in a month, but to say that these moments resulted in nothing are not really accurate either.
I think many people dismiss these things out of hand by saying "this isn't THE story to end it all" but in reality, we aren't going to know that until we have the benefit of hindsight.
Many people said that the Comey firing was "nothing important", and one week later were saying "SEE, he's still President". But at the same time can you really honestly say that today?
Can anyone really honestly say that about the Comey Memos?
In hindsight both of those moments are important turning points in public opinion and the investigation in general, and are certainly NOT "nothing".
This is likely to be similar.
Yes Donald Trump is likely to still be President in a month, but to say that these moments resulted in nothing are not really accurate either.
There is an ongoing, wide spreading, independent investigation into Trump's team. Stuff like this works into their case. Just because there's no immediate action does not mean it's nothing.Not nothing - they've driven down his approval rating by ... three points? Or so?
But otherwise, yes it's been nothing so far. Maybe it will be something eventually. More likely the best result is it depresses Republican turnout in 2018 and the Democrats regain the house.
Steve isn't saying this is nothing, to be fair.I think many people dismiss these things out of hand by saying "this isn't THE story to end it all" but in reality, we aren't going to know that until we have the benefit of hindsight.
Many people said that the Comey firing was "nothing important", and one week later were saying "SEE, he's still President". But at the same time can you really honestly say that today?
Can anyone really honestly say that about the Comey Memos?
In hindsight both of those moments are important turning points in public opinion and the investigation in general, and are certainly NOT "nothing".
This is likely to be similar.
Yes Donald Trump is likely to still be President in a month, but to say that these moments resulted in nothing are not really accurate either.
I feel like I'm in a weird position sometimes just in that I recognize that these kinds of stories absolutely are a big deal and help to build the case against Trump, but also recognize that this is a slow, arduous process that won't yield the desired results quickly, and may never pay off completely.
It was always pretty clear that the Kaine thing was just some red meat for the base
NEW: @RepCummings sends letter to Trump Jr., Kushner, Manafort requesting documents on meeting with Russian lawyer
https://twitter.com/evanmcmurry/status/884891549720596482
I'd say that's the "proper" position for a complicated situation like this one.
I want Trump to lick the boot of Lady Liberty as much as anyone, but these things take time.
What, Don Jr isn't that old at all
Both right, apologies. I was thinking of trump sr being bad at technology too and mixed them upTrump Jr isn't old.
I know it is Claude Taylor and all, but still:
https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/884509836708376576
That's kinda the point. Even if the Russian lawyer didn't give them a damn thing, the fact is they were interested in what she COULD have and acted on it.
Lol, I know this slowly burned Gowdy's soul as he signed this.
What did they put nano machines in her to record her conversations?
I don't buy it. The only way to record that meeting was to either have Trump Tower bugged or have the Russian lawyer bugged, and neither seem even remotely plausible.
The IC caught Flynn because his conversation took place with a Russian over a phone line that was bugged. We don't have that here.
I feel like I'm in a weird position sometimes just in that I recognize that these kinds of stories absolutely are a big deal and help to build the case against Trump, but also recognize that this is a slow, arduous process that won't yield the desired results quickly, and may never pay off completely.
On the other hand I bet the Russians have recordings of these conversations.
Not nothing - they've driven down his approval rating by ... three points? Or so?
But otherwise, yes it's been nothing so far. Maybe it will be something eventually. More likely the best result is it depresses Republican turnout in 2018 and the Democrats regain the house.
Now this I could believe.
Yeah it's not like the Comey firing got a special counsel appointed or anything.
Honestly I would not be surprised if Trump Tower was tapped.
Trump has allowed numerous criminal groups etc. operate out of the building. Some of those groups have been brought down by the FBI etc.
I don't think that's an uncommon view here.I feel like I'm in a weird position sometimes just in that I recognize that these kinds of stories absolutely are a big deal and help to build the case against Trump, but also recognize that this is a slow, arduous process that won't yield the desired results quickly, and may never pay off completely.
Has the journalist's last 'I'm still reporting' been revealed yet?
Wasn't that pre-emails? I think it was the emails.
Wasn't that pre-emails? I think it was the emails.
Not nothing - they've driven down his approval rating by ... three points? Or so?
But otherwise, yes it's been nothing so far. Maybe it will be something eventually. More likely the best result is it depresses Republican turnout in 2018 and the Democrats regain the house.
I don't think that's an uncommon view here.
No, he did it then and he did it again today, so there's something else coming.
Has the journalist's last 'I'm still reporting' been revealed yet?