• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NYT now has the email to Donald Trump Jr. offering Russian aid to "incriminate"

Status
Not open for further replies.

jelly

Member
So, when does Trump just throw his desk and attempts to fire Mueller by firing that other guy who can only do it but then needs a yes man replacement to do it. He must be going nuts that he doesn't have the power or at the very least brush this all under the carpet.
 
Just on MSNBC, that the Trump Tower project in Russia wasn't dropped because Trump ran for president, but because of an economic downturn caused by sanctions placed upon Russia by the US. That's according to an interview earlier this year with Rob Goldstone.

Didn't catch which publication, but will try to hunt down a link.
 

Joe

Member
EDIT: I was wrong.

If the time stamp is accurate, that's amazing

That timeline is a little off.

June 3rd, 2016: Rob Goldstone emails Donald Trump Jr. about meeting with ”Russian government lawyer"

June 7th, 2016: Donald Trump gives speech in which he promises a major speech about Hillary Clinton's crimes on June 13th

June 9th, 2016: Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort meet with Natalia Veselnitskaya (”Russian government lawyer")

Source: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/look-at-the-timeline
 

Z_Y

Member
That timeline is a little off.

June 3rd, 2016: Rob Goldstone emails Donald Trump Jr. about meeting with “Russian government lawyer”

June 7th, 2016: Donald Trump gives speech in which he promises a major speech about Hillary Clinton’s crimes on June 13th

June 9th, 2016: Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort meet with Natalia Veselnitskaya (“Russian government lawyer”)

Source: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/look-at-the-timeline

I haven't check the email dates but I think they meant he confirmed the date of appointment on the 7th. Meaning after he agreed to meet the Russian lawyer he probably told his dad about it all.
 

PKrockin

Member
That timeline is a little off.

June 3rd, 2016: Rob Goldstone emails Donald Trump Jr. about meeting with ”Russian government lawyer"

June 7th, 2016: Donald Trump gives speech in which he promises a major speech about Hillary Clinton's crimes on June 13th

June 9th, 2016: Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort meet with Natalia Veselnitskaya (”Russian government lawyer")

Source: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/look-at-the-timeline
From the tweet:

June 7 - 5:16 PM - Don Jr. confirms meeting w/ Russian lawyer

According to the emails Donny Jr released, that's accurate. He did indeed confirm a meeting at 5:16 PM on June 7th. The 3rd is just when the email chain started.

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789418455953413
 

Joe

Member
I haven't check the email dates but I think they meant he confirmed the date of appointment on the 7th. Meaning after he agreed to meet the Russian lawyer he probably told his dad about it all.

From the tweet:



According to the emails Donny Jr released, that's accurate. He did indeed confirm a meeting at 5:16 PM on June 7th. The 3rd is just when the email chain started.

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789418455953413
Oh dang! Thanks for the clarification. The timeline is even crazier than I thought.
 

Makonero

Member
DONALD TRUMP JR. REVIEWS FAMOUS WORKS OF LITERATURE
Crime and Punishment

I'll be honest — I've never read this book. Now, in the event that someone tells you they saw me reading it, rest assured that I don't recall what it was about. Look: did I read it? I mean, sure, of course, maybe. What happened was a close friend of mine from the 2013 Miss Universe pageant recommended it to me; I didn't know who the author was or anything going in, but who's going to say no to a favor from a close pageant friend? I have read this book at least three other times in secret, and my father also briefly considered this one as a campaign slogan.

LOL

I love the Animal Farm review:

Animal Farm

This is a tremendous children's story about a talking pig named Napoleon who becomes the greatest leader his farm has ever known. After Napoleon destroys Crooked Snowball in a free and fair election by easily the greatest margin of not-being-chased-off-by-dogs in history, the new leader delivers on his promise to make the farm great again by using creative solutions to bring back law and order. Throughout his administration, Napoleon is constantly harassed by jealous losers, such as the stupid old donkey who only complains and, you guessed it: Crooked Snowball! That's right, even though Crooked Snowball doesn't hold power and technically isn't even still around at all, this totally corrupt swine just can't stop causing problems for the farm. Every time Napoleon tries to score a win for the animals, the ghost of Crooked Snowball is there to trip him up, fueled by liberal rage and an insatiable love of windmills even though they obstruct everyone's view and kill birds. Nevertheless, Napoleon persists, and in the end he wows everyone with his mastery of several terrific words and his knack for dealmaking, which he uses to create a strategic back-channel alliance with the humans (whom we actually should want to have a positive working relationship with when you really think about it).
 

jelly

Member
I do wonder if the US will go all the way to nail Trump and friends or try to avoid airing their dirty laundry. It's something the establishment usually does to save face. That's my fear of Trump getting off the hook, if he really is that dodgy, could the US government take that on the chin or would they like it to go away quietly. You could say not ripping Trump and co to shreds makes them look worse but people forget stuff they don't know. Can the US look at itself after Trump and think they went all the way and threw the book at him or did they brush it off and let him off easy so embarrassment and the history books don't note the US democracy as a lemon?
 

Nerazar

Member
Just on MSNBC, that the Trump Tower project in Russia wasn't dropped because Trump ran for president, but because of an economic downturn caused by sanctions placed upon Russia by the US. That's according to an interview earlier this year with Rob Goldstone.

Didn't catch which publication, but will try to hunt down a link.

So Donald is willing to sell off America and its allies, because we wants to build a tower in Moscow? That's vile... ... and so, so expected.
 

Zolo

Member
I do wonder if the US will go all the way to nail Trump and friends or try to avoid airing their dirty laundry. It's something the establishment usually does to save face. That's my fear of Trump getting off the hook, if he really is that dodgy, could the US government take that on the chin or would they like it to go away quietly. You could say not ripping Trump and co to shreds makes them look worse but people forget stuff they don't know. Can the US look at itself after Trump and think they went all the way and threw the book at him or did they brush it off and let him off easy so embarrassment and the history books don't note the US democracy as a lemon?

The impression I get is the IC want to nail him. I figure in a worst case scenario, the Republican party will ask him to resign in exchange for a pardon from Pence.
 

Ovid

Member
So Donald is willing to sell off America and its allies, because we wants to build a tower in Moscow? That's vile... ... and so, so expected.
If his family and legacy is better off why would he care about what happens to everyone else?

That why I don't understand how people could be fooled by this man (baby).
 

Tovarisc

Member
Donald Trump Jr. tells Sean Hannity: 'In retrospect I probably would have done things a little differently'

Donald Trump Jr. acknowledged in an exclusive interview with Fox News’ “Hannity” Monday night that he “probably would have done things a little differently” when he met with a Russian attorney during his father’s presidential campaign in June 2016.

However, the president’s eldest son also described the meeting as “a nothing,” telling Fox News’ Sean Hannity “I wouldn’t have even remembered it until you started scouring through this stuff. It was literally just a wasted 20 minutes, which was a shame.”
In one of the messages, Goldstone told Trump Jr. that Russian officials were offering “some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary [Clinton” as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

Trump Jr.’s response email read, in part, “if it’s what you say I love it.”

“I had been reading about scandals that people were probably underreporting for a long time so maybe it was something that had to do with one of those things,” Trump Jr. told Hannity when asked about his reaction to Goldstone’s email. “I didn’t know if there was any credibility, I didn’t know if there was anything behind it, I can’t vouch for the information. Someone sent me an email. I can’t help what someone sends me. I read it, I responded accordingly."
“For me this was opposition research,” Trump Jr. said. "They had something, you know, maybe concrete evidence to all the stories I’d been hearing about … so I think I wanted to hear it out. But really it went nowhere and it was apparent that wasn’t what the meeting was about.”
In his interview Tuesday evening, Trump Jr. denied telling his father about the Veselnitskaya meeting, saying “There was nothing to tell.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ould-have-done-things-little-differently.html
 
Don Jr. not telling dad about a meeting he was in = I really, really don't think so.

Kush not telling dad about the meeting that he was also in = zero fucking chance in hell.
 
Probably hope nothing happens and a pardon in a worst-case scenario.

Take the fall. Get pardoned.

Was afraid the NYT would only release specific parts of the emails and they would look worse out of context.

Ah gotcha.

Usually I can't believe these people can be so stupid but their decisions are so illogical they are either playing 4D Chess or Tiffany's the only one with more brain cells than she has fingers.

Lol, where is tiffany these days?
 

jay

Member
So Donald is willing to sell off America and its allies, because we wants to build a tower in Moscow? That's vile... ... and so, so expected.

Yeah, it always comes down to sex or money. Could be both if Russia has dirt on sex stuff.
 

jstripes

Banned
The impression I get is the IC want to nail him. I figure in a worst case scenario, the Republican party will ask him to resign in exchange for a pardon from Pence.
You're assuming key players in the GOP aren't compromised too. Some of them likely have as much to lose as Trump.

Oh my. I just heard Mueller got this and looking into it.

Someone is fucked.
He has all he needs to subpoena mail servers now.
 

Makonero

Member
See this yet?

http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/11/media/right-wing-media-donald-trump-jr-emails-russians/index.html

Raheem Kassam, editor-in-chief of Breitbart London, reacted to the story of Donald J. Trump's newly-released emails in a way that wouldn't typically be expected from someone at the far-right outfit, which is a reliable supporter of President Trump.
"So like, this is straight up collusion," he wrote in the news outlet's internal Slack, according to a transcript of the conversation obtained by CNN. "Right?"

Minutes before, Donald Trump Jr. had disclosed on Twitter an email exchange from June 2016 in which he'd agreed to meet with someone he'd been told was a "Russian government attorney" about "very high level and sensitive information" that would "incriminate" Hillary Clinton.

The text of the emails sent shockwaves through most newsrooms. At Breitbart, not everyone was on the same page.

Some staffers were seemingly left astonished. Writing in the company Slack, senior editor Rebecca Mansour reacted with only one word: "Wow." Amanda House, the outlet's deputy politics editor, wrote only, "???????"

But Matthew Boyle, Breitbart's Washington editor, who has been fervently pro-Trump, was less than convinced of the severity of the situation.

"I mean I don't take this as a smoking gun at all. This is silly," he wrote.

The debate inside Breitbart, was emblematic of a larger sense of confusion that appeared to grip much of the pro-Trump media following the bombshell release of the Donald Trump Jr. emails. Typically, people and outlets that support Trump will coalesce around a message relatively quickly; not this time, though.
 
A great point someone made on CNN.

Do people honestly think that everyone involved in this hasn't searched through all their e-mails to find anything related to Russia from the campaign, to come forward with if indeed 'nothing' happened.

They keep claiming they forgot about it until it came up.

But RUSSIA has been headlines for months and months and months. It's been up. It's been at the forefront.
 

Mahonay

Banned
A great point someone made on CNN.

Do people honestly think that everyone involved in this hasn't searched through all their e-mails to find anything related to Russia from the campaign, to come forward with if indeed 'nothing' happened.

They keep claiming they forgot about it until it came up.

But RUSSIA has been headlines for months and months and months. It's been up. It's been at the forefront.
Or if you're someone like Sessions you conveniently "don't recall" conversations you had with Russians.
 
Or if you're someone like Sessions you conveniently "don't recall" conversations you had with Russians.

Conversations. Sure. You forgot. Hard to disprove.

Easily searchable e-mail databases?

When you've been asked the question more than once? When it remains in the news? You never searched through your e-mails to see if there's anything you're forgetting?
 

jay

Member
Conversations. Sure. You forgot. Hard to disprove.

Easily searchable e-mail databases?

When you've been asked the question more than once? When it remains in the news? You never searched through your e-mails to see if there's anything you're forgetting?

How would anyone remember something so insignificant and legal?
 

Mahonay

Banned
Conversations. Sure. You forgot. Hard to disprove.

Easily searchable e-mail databases?

When you've been asked the question more than once? When it remains in the news? You never searched through your e-mails to see if there's anything you're forgetting?
Yes it's pretty blatant.
 

norm9

Member
I+am+getting+bored+of+her+because+she+s+doing+the+_4713cf0963c05881ed6acbc53600d38e.gif
 
You have to assume they do. Another tool of blackmailing Trump and his associates and the entire GOP. I don't believe that anyone from that team would avoid a Russian honeypot.

Definitely. There's still the distinction possible that Trump Jr. posted the emails and basically admitted to having criminal intentions because the contents of the meeting is actually much worse than just discussing "russian adoptions"..

Trump made his first tweet about Clinton's 33.000 missing emails 10 minutes after the meeting was over and told his followers he had something big on Clinton the same evening. Early next week Wikileaks tweet they have gotten ahold of Clintons emails. A couple of days later they start releasing them in batches.

To me that sounds like Trump Jr + Kuskner and Manafort delivered whatever Clinton info they got from the russian lawyer directly to Trump after the meeting. He promtly tweeted about it and then probably gave his blessing to inform the russians that they should go ahead and releasing the info through Wikileaks.
 

jstripes

Banned
What I don't get is why they make clearly criminal plans like this through... plain old corporate email.

"Hey team, just wanna touch base with you on the treason meeting we're having next week."

Fucking clownshoes.
 
How would anyone remember something so insignificant and legal?

Quite.

The subject of the e-mail is "Russia - Clinton - Private and confidential"

There's no narrative where I believe that they haven't been going through their communications given everything going on.
 

Linkura

Member
If she’s intelligent at all, far the fuck away from her creepozoid family for a change. ;-)

I think Tiffany and Barron will be the only kids who are relatively unscathed by this shit. She was right to stay the fuck away from the family business.
 

jay

Member
That's a pretty good legal defense.

She asked if I wanted to pay money for sex and I responded accordingly.

They asked if I wanted to embezzle funds and I responded accordingly.
 

Zips

Member
What's the game plan here from Jr.?

I'm not following

Currently they appear to be taking the strategy of running straight towards the danger by posing as 'transparent' about it (despite being caught in lies and omissions), in the hope that they can sway public opinion and keep the populace from reacting too strongly by passing it off as nothing.

On the legal side I imagine they hope to squeak by on vagueries in the law, and if all else fails then maybe a pardon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom