This isn't true, for example, if a U.N resolution was made for a military intervention it would be fully legal. No right to invade a country committing genocide, one of the very reasons the U.N exist is a false belief. Rights can be taken away depending on the crime.
LOL... Are you using Mayanmar's army as a reason to be against it? Maybe you should talk to Iraq. Vietnam was an example of U.S tying it's hands behind it's back and North Korea took a Chinese intervention to deadlock it right next to their border. Just saying, their military isn't a reason to do nothing.
I truly don't like pacifist on this level. Not sure how you think the refugee thing is a solution, maybe part of a solution that is temporary. At some point you have to ask yourself just how many people are you willing to let die while being against intervention before realizing it only added to the death count and atrocities committed.
I do agree with you on donating to refugee organizations, because that is what most of us can easily do when the country does not care about the issue enough to even give it a front page on their big news sites. I disagree with you to the death saying a country can commit genocide while you spout "no right to intervene" or "not our problem", it is a problem for humanity, then it is our problem.
No, this is because E.U downsized their military due to the peace that we have obtained in this world with a U.S ally being the only superpower in the world. They had no reason to keep a huge army, which unfortunately puts a lot of burden on U.S for interventions.