I just don't buy this whole "inconvenience" angle.
The cops could just let the protesters make their way to the stock exchange and peacefully protest like they have for the last 2 months, but they decided it'd be best to put every kind of barricade under the Sun up, and station hundreds of cops around all the hedge funds and debt collectors and high-end shops and so on down there.
The city could've let things be easy, but instead they wanted to stop the trains in lower Manhattan and cause delays and whathaveyou.
But hey...it's easy to blame protesters for actions the city takes against them than it is to blame the city for the actions it takes against harmless, regular people. It's easier to say "man, this protest makes it hard for me to get to my job" than it is to say "man, I hope this protesting gets people to wake up and deal with the messages it's conveying", or "man, the cops and the city are dicks for not even attempting to allow peaceful protests and just barricading everything like people were rioting - the city inconvenienced me!".
I hope they keep protesting indefinitely, even if the "people" don't support them. The Tea Party did so, and they managed to pull off some political stuff - even if I don't agree with that stuff. The movement is too important to be disregarded or denigrated because it's hard to get to work while they're protesting.