alstein said:
I'm not going to want martyrs, because that means someone lost their lives.
I hope this can be done without bloodshed. I fear if this movement fails, the next movement is going to be more radical and more violent. The 99% isn't going away even if they get crushed.
This is the wisdom Otto Von Bismarck and Teddy Roosevelt had- they knew this, and this is why they reformed society. Our current leadership (especially the Republicans, and some Democrats) lacks this wisdom.
I get that, but the media who are the gatekeepers for the public narrative of these things are literally going out of their way to make it easy for the people in power to ignore/suppress/denigrate them and the changes that need to be made.
Somehow, while 1,000+ people were marching in New York City for this most public of protests, in solidarity with multiple similar movement across the country, the local news at 8:30am this morning was as follows:
- ABC: interviewing the Muppets
- NBC: camping by some Thanksgiving thing
- CBS: talking about gasoline
Fox, naturally, was even more amazing; they actually discussed and reported from the protests, but did their best to:
- avoid using the name of the movement (as if to mitigate its relevance by not calling it what it is)
- avoid reporting on what the movement was for, just calling it a "gathering"
- report on the aspect of "inconvenience" (omg, the trains! omg, people can't get to work!)
- spend 20 seconds on it
Again, the people in power will not do ANYTHING until they absolutely have to - so this movement needs to persist and grow in obnoxiousness until it cannot be avoided by those people. I don't want martyrs either, but I do want to see that persistence.