jamesinclair
Banned
remnant said:If this an example of financial thinking in America, than god help us all. If the city of Boston is having to pay over 150K overime due to an event that was unforseen and unbudgetted, that is going to affect their revenue for next year, not including the effect that this has had on local buisness and the taxes they pay. Decreased revenue and increased costs? Not good for City.
Comparing that to a 45 million tax cut meant to pay off in the long run is a stretch. If that investment works they could pay that off in a short amount of time.
1) They dont have to pay any overtime. 3,000 are protesting. How many people flood the mall every weekend? Do cops descend on the mall for crowd control?
2) The whole damn job of the police is to respond to "the unforeseen". Your line of thinking "there was a fire? fucking hell, now the fire department has to get off their ass and go fix that. Ugh, think of the cost of gas, insurance, labor....ugh"
3) A protest = less tax revenues? Uh, sure. That makes sense.
Yeah, Im sure the 45 million tax break for the wealthy firm will come back. It always does. Thats why as soon as these tax breaks run out, the companies mvoe, every time.
Ask Fidelity how they rewarded Mass for their massive tax cuts. (Hint, they fired a bunch of people and elft the state once the cuts expired)
And how many mom and pop businesses get targeted 45 million cuts to expand their store? Does the local chinese place, the laundromat, the taco shop....do they get tax cuts to add jobs?
No, they cant afford to pay for hundreds of lobbyists and bribes.