Sharp said:No way the Nats end up at .500 but we might be able to play spoiler in the upcoming Braves series
What's funny is, according to BP the Braves are still 5 games ahead of their third-order expected wins. This period of totally blowing is just regular regression after all!darkside31337 said:Hope you guys can do what the Mets couldn't today.
*wins 2 of 3 vs. Braves*darkside31337 said:Hope you guys can do what the Mets couldn't today.
hemtae said:Well at least the Angels lost
Today wasn't a total waste
Yes.. Your Los Angeles Dodgers... in 1962.. Wils DrysdaleNinja Scooter said:Has a none playoff team ever had an MVP and a Cy Young?
rc213 said:Matt Kemp gawdamn! Can he get to 40/40?
Playoff Odds at the end of September 22
AMERICAN LEAGUE
Tigers -- 100% (clinched AL Central title 9/16)
Yankees -- 100% (clinched AL East title 9/21)
Rangers -- 99.5% (lead AL West by 5.0; 6 games remaining)
Red Sox -- 88.9% (lead AL Wild Card by 2.0; 6 games remaining)
Rays -- 8.0% (trail AL Wild Card by 2.0; 6 games remaining)
Angels -- 3.7% (trail AL Wild Card by 3.0; 6 games remaining)
NATIONAL LEAGUE
Phillies -- 100% (clinched NL East title 9/17)
Diamondbacks -- 99.9% (clinched NL West tie 9/22)
Brewers -- 99.9% (lead NL Central by 5.0; 6 games remaining)
Braves -- 75.0% (lead NL Wild Card by 2.0; 6 games remaining)
Cardinals -- 24.4% (trail NL Wild Card by 2.0; 6 games remaining)
Giants -- 0.8% (trail NL Wild Card by 4.0; 6 games remaining)
maruchan said:Yes.. Your Los Angeles Dodgers... in 1962.. Wils Drysdale
Hell dodgers have the most mvp cy yung combos in the league with 3.. maybe 4 this year..
darkside31337 said:Yeah but those 1962 Dodgers won 102 games.
That Dodgers roster needs to be imploded. There are about 5 guys on that roster who should be on the team next season.
@JoeStrauss said:Based upon what I heard today, I am significantly adjusting odds of Pujols' return to STL. More later.
Joe said:unsurprisingly it seems like Rosenthal was wrong, nearly all moneyball reviews are positive.
yeah this is the impression i've gottendarkside31337 said:Most baseball people, at least from those who have shared their opinion online, hate the movie. The movie seems that it does an awful job representing the book and does an awful job representing what baseball operations are actually like. If you don't care or don't know anything about those 2 things then it's probably an interesting movie to see.
Thanksrc213 said:Get MLB.com At Bat 11 free today from @amazonappstore for Android http://t.co/exeQPDah
If you have an Android phone the APP is free today from the Amazon AppStore.
rc213 said:Get MLB.com At Bat 11 free today from @amazonappstore for Android http://t.co/exeQPDah
If you have an Android phone the APP is free today from the Amazon AppStore.
Probably cause it'd be boring as shit otherwise.darkside31337 said:Most baseball people, at least from those who have shared their opinion online, hate the movie. The movie seems that it does an awful job representing the book and does an awful job representing what baseball operations are actually like. If you don't care or don't know anything about those 2 things then it's probably an interesting movie to see.
Doytch said:Probably cause it'd be boring as shit otherwise.
Dmncnby2k9 said:Hows the book though? Good Read?
Joe Shlabotnik said:Oh yeah. If you're posting in this thread you're almost guaranteed to like it. I mean, unless you believe silly things like your ace is a worthless piece of shit if he has a bad World Series.
Keith law is a movie guy and he hated itSanjuro Tsubaki said:Most baseball people don't like Moneyball because they aren't movie people. Simple as that.
Wasn't that the guy complaining that none of the smaller characters were taken seriously in the film?turnbuckle said:Keith law is a movie guy and he hated it
darkside31337 said:Cliff Lee can't win the big one. Totally his fault the Phillies lost to the Yankees. He didn't do enough.
The smaller characters are kind of pushed aside because realistically this is a story about Billy Beane and Paul DePodesta. Scott Hatteberg, Dave Justice, etc. are just bit players. One thing that surprised me was they didn't really talk about the pitching staff at all outside of Chad Bradford and eventually Rincon... the rest of the crew didn't really get their due. I'm a baseball guy and a movie guy and Moneyball is excellent.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:Wasn't that the guy complaining that none of the smaller characters were taken seriously in the film?
I think the film's trailers look terrible. There are a ton of great people attached to the film and early reviews are fantastic.
New York Yankees general manager Brian Cashman admitted on Thursday that he feigned interest in Carl Crawford this offseason to drive up the price for the Boston Red Sox to sign the free agent.
"I actually had dinner with the agent to pretend that we were actually involved and drive the price up," Cashman said. "The outfield wasn't an area of need, but everybody kept writing Crawford, Crawford, Crawford, Crawford. And I was like, 'I feel like we've got Carl Crawford in Brett Gardner, except he costs more than $100 million less, with less experience.'"
But you enjoyed Warrior more! Moneyball sucks, confirmed.Meier said:The smaller characters are kind of pushed aside because realistically this is a story about Billy Beane and Paul DePodesta. Scott Hatteberg, Dave Justice, etc. are just bit players. One thing that surprised me was they didn't really talk about the pitching staff at all outside of Chad Bradford and eventually Rincon... the rest of the crew didn't really get their due. I'm a baseball guy and a movie guy and Moneyball is excellent.
There's no question that it glosses over the true day to day operations of a club and that's because that wouldn't make for compelling movie. The battle between using sabermetrics and the older, established thought processes is presented very well though and Pitt and Hill do excellent jobs. The way they weave in Beane's own experiences as a young player with his new desire to break the mold is an excellent subplot that succeeds on many levels. I'd certainly recommend the movie to anyone.
One of the more amusing moments was when Hill and Pitt are sitting in the back and the sports talk guy discusses how Howe's leadership and calm demeanor have lead them to the current 7 game win streak they're on.. which happens shortly after Beane had to ship guys off to get Howe to play his players. I'm sure a lot of front office guys would just nod their head at that scene.
So the fact that intelligent people don't like Hollywood movies pandering to the lowest common denominator (the real idiots) make the intelligent people the idiots? I'm saying this in general, not just Moneyball, especially since I haven't even seen it. Man, I sound like Keith Law. *shudders*The truth is that passionate people are sometimes idiots. People who are fans of the book and expect the movie to deliver the same experience are idiots. People who are fans of baseball history and expect this movie to deliver a documentary-like representation of events are idiots.
A Hollywood movie is so often compromised by it's inherent nature and it's end goals that you are silly for expecting something more.
CajoleJuice said:But you enjoyed Warrior more! Moneyball sucks, confirmed.
And Cashman has been pretty awesome this year.
Nah, I mean his quotes in the media and press conferences where he bashes his biggest free-agent signings.darkside31337 said:I'd say more lucky than anything. Pitching was a big need so they went out and got Bartolo Colon and Freddy Garcia. And it actually worked.
CajoleJuice said:So the fact that intelligent people don't like Hollywood movies pandering to the lowest common denominator (the real idiots) make the intelligent people the idiots? I'm saying this in general, not just Moneyball, especially since I haven't even seen it. Man, I sound like Keith Law. *shudders*
He has been brutally honest this year and I love it.CajoleJuice said:Nah, I mean his quotes in the media and press conferences where he bashes his biggest free-agent signings.