Ignatz Mouse
Banned
Seth C: Let's see the poverty numbers, which is what this was about.
I care fuck-all about how many people work at McDonald's.
I care fuck-all about how many people work at McDonald's.
akascream said:Wait.. you've already lost me.
Ignatz Mouse said:Seth C: Let's see the poverty numbers, which is what this was about.
I care fuck-all about how many people work at McDonald's.
xsarien said:And just for the record: What set me off more than anything last night was that the Republicans are going to maintain control of the Congress. I'm hoping that there are enough moderates in the mix to keep lunatics like Santorum and DeLay in line.
DarienA said:I just found that data at the BLS site, thanks. I have a question that I need to do some research on but my first question is why are the #'s during Clinton's term considered abnormal and what are they attributed to?
Willco said:... Uh, I'm not JetSetHero.
Sysgen said:your still a dumb shit
Iceman said:you know, and that was the only thing I was hoping for from this election
Ignatz Mouse said:Seth C: Let's see the poverty numbers, which is what this was about.
I care fuck-all about how many people work at McDonald's.
akascream said::lol
What an awesome conversation.
<conservative point>
<lib insult>
<conservative point>
<lib referencing some good point another lib said somewhere, about something>
Seth C said:So basically what you're saying that no matter what stats I could show you, they don't matter. That's fine. I can only present what is available to be presented. Still, based on historical figures, it is hard to argue that unemplyment under Bush is as bad as some would have you believe. Certainly, at worst, it is average.
Phoenix said:More importantly you should care about the spending power of people during those years.
Seth C said:I'm having a lot more trouble finding poverty data that doesn't show poorly for the Republican party.
HOORAY!!!Suikoguy said:Kerry just succeded!
B-B-Bomba! said:Hi, I'm in the UK, I've been watching this race with morbid interest throughout the day. I was wondering why it appears to be down to the opponent parties to state whether they have won or lost, as opposed to an independent Govt. body that could provide a definite total result maybe after a day or two?
Guileless said:If you think gassing villages and filling mass graves with your opponents is indicative of being a pussy I'd hate to know what it takes to be a hardass.
Suikoguy said:while we are stuck with bush for 4 more years.
I'd like to thank kerry for sparing us the constant insanity that could have ensued.
Seth C said:Matlock: Cute, but if you can find something, post it. I've found nothing at all, unfortunately, save for recent news stories saying it is "up." Really, I have no agenda here. I'm arguing more against exaggeration than I am against Democrats or for Republicans. I'd be just as annoyed with Republicans if they had lost and were giving us a similar "woe is me, the world is coming to a disastrous end" load of crap.
2003...... 7,607 10.0 3,856 28.0
2002...... 7,229 9.6 3,613 26.5
2001...... 6,813 9.2 3,470 26.4
2000 12/.. 6,400 8.7 3,278 25.4
1999 11/.. 6,792 9.3 3,559 27.8
1998...... 7,186 10.0 3,831 29.9
1997...... 7,324 10.3 3,995 31.6
1996...... 7,708 11.0 4,167 32.6
1995...... 7,532 10.8 4,057 32.4
1994...... 8,053 11.6 4,232 34.6
1993 10/.. 8,393 12.3 4,424 35.6
1992 9/... 8,144 11.9 4,275 35.4
1991 8/... 7,712 11.5 4,161 35.6
1990...... 7,098 10.7 3,768 33.4
1989...... 6,784 10.3 3,504 32.2
1988...... 6,874 10.4 3,642 33.4
Bush was favoured among white men, voters with family incomes over $100,000 US and evangelical Christians who view him as a messenger from God in a titanic fight to quell terrorism and spread liberty around the world
Seth C said:I'm having a lot more trouble finding solid poverty data. I'd imagine it looks similar, up and down over the long term.
Seth C said:Same here. I'm afraid it would have done more harm than good to his party, had he tried to drag this on. Last time was enough, thanks. Better so save face, be humble in defeat, and come back strong next election.
BlackSalad said:91x in san diego just reported that kerry called bush to coincide. Expect the official announcement with an hour.
=(
I need some faith right about now.
DarienA said:You're having trouble finding it? Really? That's strange:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/prevcps.html
It's gonna take a bit cause I'll have to go in to each year to pull out the figure, but give me a bit.
Sysgen said:Kerry had his shot (if that's what your referring to). Next time it just may be Hiliary vs. Giulianai.
Guileless said:When did that happen?
Sysgen said:Kerry had his shot (if that's what your referring to). Next time it just may be Hiliary vs. Giulianai.
Seth C said:Wasn't this period of economic boom also part of the time when more American citizens put themselves more in debt than ever before in our history?