Wives love HS, it's confirmed. I know mine can't wait for the game, she actually might be more hyped for it than I am, if it's possible :-Dtanod said:OP looks great.
I think that when my wife or my best friend comes over to see both Heavenly Sword and Lair playing on the HDTV, their jaws are gonna drop.
Son of Godzilla said:So how come this hasn't been locked yet?
Mods (sporsk?) came up with some silly one week early rule on official threads. Which seems to only be intended for Halo 3. /gafmartyrdomcomplexRaist said:And why exactly should it be ?
:lolSon of Godzilla said:Mods (sporsk?) came up with some silly one week early rule on official threads. Which seems to only be intended for Halo 3. /gafmartyrdomcomplex
IIRC, that is about how long it took me to beat GoW2, and I didn't feel ripped off then, so that sounds pretty good. Let us hope that it has a high replay value.Elios83 said:People who are in action games can finish it in 6-8 hours.
Elios83 said:Hey XHitoshuraX... don't you think there's something strange in the cover you posted?:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
![]()
Marconelly said:She even commented on how Nariko doesn't have the typical videogame bimbo thing about her, and appears to have depth and gravity as a character.
Son of Godzilla said:So how come this hasn't been locked yet?
Systems_id said:What I want to know is what are the flaws? All of the reviews I've read don't pinpoint specific flaws besides "the game is too short" so I want to know if there are actual problems with the gameplay itself. Length isn't a problem with me at all unless the pacing the terrible.
Lettuce said:What on earth is going on with the reviews??? some are giving it good scores then others not so good scores
That guy who was playing HS and got flamed in the thread he created (Mesijs I think?), should just post his impressions here. I'm not bumping the abomination that thread has become, but I'd like to ask him how difficult is the Hard (Hell) difficulty mode. That's something none of the reviews I've read have even touched upon, and I'm thinking, if it's sufficiently more difficult (but not annoyingly so), that alone could make the playthrough last longer.
Does hell difficulty add something thing special. I've seen several people mention that reviews dont talk about Hell difficulty, but I'm not sure I see why they need to.tanod said:1UP's review is up. It's by Matt Leone. After reading it, insta-buy for me confirmed.
BTW, it says 10 hours. No mention of Hell difficulty again. Of course, it's the same as the lead review in EGM so 8.0 is the score.
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3162437
Elios83 said:Hey XHitoshuraX... don't you think there's something strange in the cover you posted?:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
![]()
BobTheFork said:Does hell difficulty add something thing special. I've seen several people mention that reviews dont talk about Hell difficulty, but I'm not sure I see why they need to.
Hot fan art boxart
dionysus said:I think Nariko has just replaced Yuna as the number 1 video game woman in my heart!
tanod said:1UP's review is up. It's by Matt Leone. After reading it, insta-buy for me confirmed.
BTW, it says 10 hours. No mention of Hell difficulty again. Of course, it's the same as the lead review in EGM so 8.0 is the score.
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3162437
That's a fair complaint, but one you can apply to just about any game of it's kind, even NG, famed for it's combat, has a "magic" combo (based on flying swallow) that you can use and abuse with no penalty. I always chose not to do that kind of thing in games, because even though you're "proving" that the game has some kind of exploit, you're also limiting your own enjoyment.RubberJohnny said:Edge's review said that the game was too easy on Hell Difficulty, you could complete the game using only a few combos over and over again and there was no requirement or motivation to learn the combat system to a deep extent.
Yeah, that's pretty much it. I certainly hope it does well in sales, I think these guys have really good vision and will be able to deliver even more if they keep being funded like they've been for HS.Elios83 said:Quite simple.
Those who give a lot of credit to the artistic and dramatic direction in a game are enthusiastic and are giving the game high scores ( 8s and 9s).
Those who look at the length as an issue and think the gameplay is not perfectly nailed are giving it decent scores (7s).
Overall I believe it's great game,not a masterpiece in all its elements but it's the first project from this developer with a big budget and I believe they have achieved a great result. I believe the game will have a lot of success among the public because its characters and artstyle really catch the attention.
Marconelly said:Pretty nice writeup on 1up indeed. Is it really possible that of all bigger US media, IGN will score HS the lowest? That just seems... wrong. :-D
That's a fair complaint, but one you can apply to just about any game of it's kind, even NG, famed for it's combat, has a "magic" combo (based on flying swallow) that you can use and abuse with no penalty.
Yeah, that's pretty much it. I certainly hope it does well in sales, I think these guys have really good vision and will be able to deliver even more if they keep being funded like they've been for HS.
XHitoshuraX said:Yeah IGN is ALL over the place with reviews I swear.
And I agree with what Doc Evils said...this game will be GREAT...for PS3 owners. This just isn't a game that has that sort of market envy appeal. I see it selling sort of like ICO did...to be honest.
Elios83 said:IMO you're wrong, this has nothing do to with Ico, it's clearly designed to catch the attention,to sell and move systems. We'll see in September though![]()
I really, really hope it does better, because that's probably the only way we'll see next game from these guys with this kind of budget. I also do think it will do a lot better.XHitoshuraX said:I see it selling sort of like ICO did...to be honest.
XHitoshuraX said:Well yeah, I didn't mean to say that it was marketed as such (though if more people had played Ico the world would be a better place). I just dont see it selling THAT well. Even more so with the 400,000 "HS = am failz" posts >.<
PistolGrip said:very nice thread
its Kittonwy's actually we are protesting for a wrongful ban and a display that power does corrupt even in Gaf.XHitoshuraX said:Thank you! My first official thread so I wanted to do it right....gotta get experience under my belt before I start my monster Silent Hill V thread....in like a year >.<
(And you have tanod's avatar btw)
Yeah I suppose your right. Its just amazing to me how people are all out ATTACKING this game.
Heavenly Sword Started life as an XBOX game that was eventually shifted onto the PS3.
Marconelly said:The only mistake that I can see there is this:
That's not really true. The engine developers of this game post at Beyond3D, and I remember reading there some details of evolution of their engine. I know for sure they've said it was never intended to be a last gen hardware game (Xbox or otherwise), and it was developed with next gen in mind from the beginning - on a PC with Ati Radeon 9800, which allowed for fixed-point precision HDR, to be moved on to some other, better (but still old in comparison to PS3 GPU) graphics card that allowed floating point HDR, and eventually to PS3.
Marconelly said:The only mistake that I can see there is this:
That's not really true. The engine developers of this game post at Beyond3D, and I remember reading there some details of evolution of their engine. I know for sure they've said it was never intended to be a last gen hardware game (Xbox or otherwise), and it was developed with next gen in mind from the beginning - on a PC with Ati Radeon 9800, which allowed for fixed-point precision HDR, to be moved on to some other, better (but still old in comparison to PS3 GPU) graphics card that allowed floating point HDR, and eventually to PS3.