Official LAIR thread

If controls are the main issue then I think it'll be fine for me. Tru gamerz adapt to that sheet. These guys probably had a hard time with Flow too.
 
vpance said:
If controls are the main issue then I think it'll be fine for me. Tru gamerz adapt to that sheet. These guys probably had a hard time with Flow too.

Yeah, DMC3 and NSG I buy, play for an hour. And the put it down and don't pick it up for 1-2 months. Those two games are hard to learn. I do this to just get a feel on how hard it is.

After 1-2 months. I'll pick it up and actually TAKE the TIME to learn the moves. Then, it's fun.

And I think it might be this way for Warhawk (jet) and Lair. Well, see.
 
Factor 5 makes beautiful game with shitty gameplay. More at 11.

They should have stuck to the Rogue Squadron franchise, at least then they could get some pity points from the SW nerds.
 
Ill wait for more reviews...I dont think I have bought games that had this shitty score...but then I havent bough any games based on one score either

peace
 
I've disagreed with EGM before, I am not expecting an amazing experience but I expect to have fun with it. The scope/epic feel of it is enough for me to warrant the purchase.

I watched Die Hard 4 a couple of days ago, same deal. Nothing to write home about but despite some annoying moments it was fine. So if that's the experience I'll get with Lair I'll be happy.
 
Dunno, controls felt spot on to me. Except for the quick 180° turnaround move (quick pull controller towards you), which worked at random. But flying around felt pretty natural. I can see how some can get tired after a while but, well, did you ever ride a dragon?! It's not relaxing at all I tell u!! :lol
 
Well, review scores normally don't affect sales. Lair still has a chance of not being a flop.

PS3 owners may still be hyped for this, although I'd say the interest on this game has diminished from the prelaunch days.
 
TTP said:
Dunno, controls felt spot on to me. Except for the quick 180° turnaround move (quick pull controller towards you), which worked at random. But flying around felt pretty natural. I can see how some can get tired after a while but, well, did you ever ride a dragon?! It's not relaxing at all I tell u!! :lol

That's good to hear. What publication/site do you work for?
 
RIght now ppl shouldn't basing their critique on the EGM scores, since we don' know what the editors wrote.

BAse it more on the Gamepro score, which was more informative
 
Tideas said:
RIght now ppl shouldn't basing their critique on the EGM scores, since we don' know what the editors wrote.

BAse it more on the Gamepro score, which was more informative

Didn't the OP in the egm thread summarize each editors thoughts?
 
Thunderbear said:
That's good to hear. What publication/site do you work for?

Doesnt really matter cos a) u dont read italian do you? and b) I work for various publications as I'm a freelance guy atm. Basically I mostly write for neoGAF :lol
 
TTP said:
Doesnt really matter cos a) u dont read italian do you? and b) I work for various publications as I'm a freelance guy atm. Basically I mostly write for neoGAF :lol

Cool :)
 
This might just be a case similar to SSX Blur on the Wii. Some get the waggle and hail it as a masterpiece, some just don't or don't give it a chance at all, calling it broken.

Welcome to waggleworld, PS3 fans :)
 
there has been some AMAZING damage control in this thread

I DON'T TRUST THESE REVIEWERS

I DON'T TRUST EGM

I TRUST GAMEPRO MORE THAN EGM, THEIR RATING SCALE IS MORE REALISTIC... WHEN THEY RATE A CATEGORY 4 OUT OF 5 THE FACE IS LIKE :D BUT WHEN THEY RATE IT 5 OUT OF 5 THE FACE IS LIKE :D BUT WITH HIS EYEBROWS IN THE AIR AND THAT'S WHEN YOU KNOW IT'S REALLY GOOD

I PREDICT THE AVERAGE SCORES TO BE AROUND 7-8 SO 7-8 IS GOOD HEY GUYS DID YOU HEAR LAIR GOT 8 OUT OF 10 IN MY MIND

THE REVIEW COMPLAINED THAT IT WAS TIRESOME TO PLAY OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME WITH THE MOTION CONTROLS, BUT I PLAYED THE GAME FOR 10 MINUTES AND IT FELT FINE TO ME

IF THE CONTROLS ARE THE PROBLEM, THAT'S OKAY WITH ME, I'M GOOD AT CONTROLS

you guys are awesome, NEVER STOP BELIEVING!
 
Mike Works said:
there has been some AMAZING damage control in this thread

I DON'T TRUST THESE REVIEWERS

I DON'T TRUST EGM

I TRUST GAMEPRO MORE THAN EGM, THEIR RATING SCALE IS MORE REALISTIC... WHEN THEY RATE A CATEGORY 4 OUT OF 5 THE FACE IS LIKE :D BUT WHEN THEY RATE IT 5 OUT OF 5 THE FACE IS LIKE :D BUT WITH HIS EYEBROWS IN THE AIR AND THAT'S WHEN YOU KNOW IT'S REALLY GOOD

I PREDICT THE AVERAGE SCORES TO BE AROUND 7-8 SO 7-8 IS GOOD HEY GUYS DID YOU HEAR LAIR GOT 8 OUT OF 10 IN MY MIND

THE REVIEW COMPLAINED THAT IT WAS TIRESOME TO PLAY OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME WITH THE MOTION CONTROLS, BUT I PLAYED THE GAME FOR 10 MINUTES AND IT FELT FINE TO ME

IF THE CONTROLS ARE THE PROBLEM, THAT'S OKAY WITH ME, I'M GOOD AT CONTROLS

you guys are awesome, NEVER STOP BELIEVING!

Hmm... questioning 1 review because you've been looking forward to a game and because you might end up having another opinion... yeah that's very weird.

Ass.

And the caps really helped too, made you come across really intelligent and open-minded.
 
Mike Works said:
there has been some AMAZING damage control in this thread

I DON'T TRUST THESE REVIEWERS

I DON'T TRUST EGM

I TRUST GAMEPRO MORE THAN EGM, THEIR RATING SCALE IS MORE REALISTIC... WHEN THEY RATE A CATEGORY 4 OUT OF 5 THE FACE IS LIKE :D BUT WHEN THEY RATE IT 5 OUT OF 5 THE FACE IS LIKE :D BUT WITH HIS EYEBROWS IN THE AIR AND THAT'S WHEN YOU KNOW IT'S REALLY GOOD

I PREDICT THE AVERAGE SCORES TO BE AROUND 7-8 SO 7-8 IS GOOD HEY GUYS DID YOU HEAR LAIR GOT 8 OUT OF 10 IN MY MIND

THE REVIEW COMPLAINED THAT IT WAS TIRESOME TO PLAY OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME WITH THE MOTION CONTROLS, BUT I PLAYED THE GAME FOR 10 MINUTES AND IT FELT FINE TO ME

IF THE CONTROLS ARE THE PROBLEM, THAT'S OKAY WITH ME, I'M GOOD AT CONTROLS

you guys are awesome, NEVER STOP BELIEVING!

There's been some very impressive counterspinning as well. Good work caps boy, maybe in this rabble of a thread, caps is the right way to go as far as getting attention goes.
 
Thunderbear said:
Hmm... questioning 1 review because you've been looking forward to a game because you might end up having another opinion... yeah that's very weird.

Ass.

And the caps really helped too, made you come across really intelligent and open-minded.

Mike Works had a good point but ruined it with CAPS.

This is the problem with hype, and it was the same story when Lost Planet was due out. Everyone gets really, really hyped up about a game, then reality hits and the game sucks. But everyone remains in denial. "No it must be good" "EGM sucks" "Everyone sucks" "Everyone is wrong except me"

But if being in denial helps you enjoy the game regardless, then good on ya I say.
 
pswii60 said:
Mike Works had a good point but ruined it with CAPS.

This is the problem with hype, and it was the same story when Lost Planet was due out. Everyone gets really, really hyped up about a game, then reality hits and the game sucks. But everyone remains in denial. "No it must be good" "EGM sucks" "Everyone sucks" "Everyone is wrong except me"

But if being in denial helps you enjoy the game regardless, then good on ya I say.

It's a good point if you're a drone. One review from EGM and the game is a failure? No one in here has claimed it's awesome despite the review, they are just saying "we might enjoy it anyway".

It's not denial, it's called thinking for yourself and not automatically believing everything you read.
 
Thunderbear said:
It's a good point if you're a drone. One review from EGM and the game is a failure? No one in here has claimed it's awesome despite the review, they are just saying "we might enjoy it anyway".

It's not denial, it's called thinking for yourself and not automatically believing everything you read.

And not let one review stop you from believing otherwise
 
antiloop said:
So the graphics, music are good? What about the story?

I didn't think there was much to be mentioned to be honest. I thought it would have great gameplay and graphics enough to push it along.
 
Tideas said:
And not let one review stop you from believing otherwise

Well for me it's not one or the other. I'm not going to believe it's either good or bad until I got enough evidence to lead me one way or the other.

Right now there's one fairly negative review from EGM, one glowing review from Play (which people dismiss) and one average review from Gamepro. That doesn't give it enough evidence for me to write off this game.

I like video reviews, I'm looking forward to Gametrailer's review.
 
I think I'm going to go in regardless. I've played the game last year and I liked it then. The overall experience is 'spiced' with stuff like ability to visit a Lair dedicated website from the main menu, Leaderboards, Home items, behind the scenes stuff +it has high production values with great music and highly impressive tech...etc. I can't really see this game deserving a 5 despite the shortcomings mentioned.
 
Wollan said:
I think I'm going to go in regardless. I've played the game last year and I liked it then. The overall experience is 'spiced' with stuff like ability to visit a Lair dedicated website from the main menu, Leaderboards, Home items, behind the scenes stuff +it has high production values with great music and highly impressive tech...etc. I can't really see this game deserving a 5 despite the shortcomings mentioned.


Who wants to miss the opportunity of having a dragon at the entrance of the Throphy Room indeed? :)
 
Thunderbear said:
one fairly negative review from EGM

Fairly negative? It was a terrible review.

And everybody knows Play's opinion is worthless.

Not looking too good right now. I've pre-ordered it anyway, and most of the really credible sources haven't reviewed it yet.

But still... that EGM review does not sound good at all.
 
In any case it should be an unique experience. The music gives it an Epic feel.

They said the sequel will have mp, if this sells good of course.
 
Tideas said:
And not let one review stop you from believing otherwise

Yeah. I don't see why you'd let a single (or in this case 3 closely related) opinions sway you to the extent that you wouldn't bother at all. Especially when you're missing the actual opinions and only have the numerical summation to go off.

An aggregate is a little more convincing, but I say, never not give something a try just from the basis of the opinions of others.
 
Thunderbear said:
Hmm... questioning 1 review because you've been looking forward to a game and because you might end up having another opinion... yeah that's very weird.
especially weird when you consider that it's actually 3 reviews.

And the caps really helped too, made you come across really intelligent and open-minded.
you're right, i should've used proper grammar while featuring this picture under my name:

avatar.1157903241.gif


would've really made me come off as an intellectual.

Thunderbear said:
One review from EGM and the game is a failure?
Three reviews.
 
Mike Works said:
Three reviews.
The other two reviews weren't bad at all,so explain why one should give credit to this and say lair is utter shit and not the others and say it's awesome?I think we should just wait for some user reviews instead of jumping to conclusions.
 
i don't expect lair to be any good -- i diverge from the 'rs2 had phenomenal graphics and mediocre gameplay' consensus, in that i think its gameplay was completely awful, worse really than that forgettable star wars starfighter game on ps2. and moreover i hate motion controls. but egm reviews are useless. in their drive to be 'tough' and bring the scoring average back down to 5, they'll overlook the merits of anything at all idiosyncratic or open to attack. and if they do praise something idiosyncratic, it'll be a bloody useless ds 'game' like hotel dusk. i don't know. i don't place any faith in play or gamepro either, but i'd rather see game reviews that are perceptive about the merits of games that aren't obvious 'aaa' critic-bait. better that than egm's idea of 'toughness.'

and if this post makes no sense it's because it's 4 o clock on a sunday morning and i'm still drunk
 
ElFly said:
Well, review scores normally don't affect sales. Lair still has a chance of not being a flop.

PS3 owners may still be hyped for this, although I'd say the interest on this game has diminished from the prelaunch days.

Agreed. People will buy this game to show off their PS3 if anything else.
 
Wollan said:
I think I'm going to go in regardless. I've played the game last year and I liked it then. The overall experience is 'spiced' with stuff like ability to visit a Lair dedicated website from the main menu, Leaderboards, Home items, behind the scenes stuff +it has high production values with great music and highly impressive tech...etc. I can't really see this game deserving a 5 despite the shortcomings mentioned.
I think there lies the problems for some. If the game do suck(which are still preliminary right now since reviews are just starting to trickle in), the mentality that it deserve to not get panned because of the high production values alone is, well, aggravating to some people(
Wii people
).
 
When did everyone decide the Squadron series was bad again? I thought III was pretty amazing, ridiculous amounts of content packed into a tiny disc.
 
Despite the reviews, I think the uniqueness of LAIR (can't think of any games where you fly on a dragon that have come out in the last 4-5 years) along with its amazing visuals will be enough for PS3 owners to giive it a try. If this were coming out after the bigger franchises such as Ratchet or GTA, then I'd say LAIR was dead. But I think people will go to the store to buy Madden, see LAIR on the shelves, and be curious enough to rent or buy it.
 
Mike Works said:
there has been some AMAZING damage control in this thread

I DON'T TRUST THESE REVIEWERS

I DON'T TRUST EGM

I TRUST GAMEPRO MORE THAN EGM, THEIR RATING SCALE IS MORE REALISTIC... WHEN THEY RATE A CATEGORY 4 OUT OF 5 THE FACE IS LIKE :D BUT WHEN THEY RATE IT 5 OUT OF 5 THE FACE IS LIKE :D BUT WITH HIS EYEBROWS IN THE AIR AND THAT'S WHEN YOU KNOW IT'S REALLY GOOD

I PREDICT THE AVERAGE SCORES TO BE AROUND 7-8 SO 7-8 IS GOOD HEY GUYS DID YOU HEAR LAIR GOT 8 OUT OF 10 IN MY MIND

THE REVIEW COMPLAINED THAT IT WAS TIRESOME TO PLAY OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME WITH THE MOTION CONTROLS, BUT I PLAYED THE GAME FOR 10 MINUTES AND IT FELT FINE TO ME

IF THE CONTROLS ARE THE PROBLEM, THAT'S OKAY WITH ME, I'M GOOD AT CONTROLS

you guys are awesome, NEVER STOP BELIEVING!
While the caps are extremely annoying, I agree. It's pretty amazing how three reviews have so easily been thrown away by so many
 
It's also amaazing that people put all their trust into other people's opinions instead of playing the games themselves.
 
dralla said:
It's also amaazing that people put all their trust into other people's opinions instead of playing the games themselves.

That would entail dropping $60 (or getting a demo, which it does not look like we're getting here). If the aggregate of reviews says it's a no-buy, it's probably a no-buy.
 
dralla said:
It's also amaazing that people put all their trust into other people's opinions instead of playing the games themselves.

True that. I've seen people saying they wont buy a game based on a review. Sure, you can take notes etc., but reviews are just personal opinion, your own opinion of the game can be complete different. Atleast i hope these people try the demo or rent the game first before they decide to buy or not, not just based on a review.
 
dralla said:
It's also amaazing that people put all their trust into other people's opinions instead of playing the games themselves.

So if reviews are useless why are we talking about them on gaf ? we just have to ban egm/ign/gamepro/etc ...

I don't have the money to buy all the games, and when i try a game like 10 min, i can't say if it will be "good" after 10 hours.

I read review because it helps me to chose my games because i don't have much money (and i suppose that i am not alone)
 
Sapapayo said:
So if reviews are useless why are we talking about them on gaf ? we just have to ban egm/ign/gamepro/etc ... I don't have the money to buy all the games, and when i try a game like 10 min, i can't say if it will be "good" after 10 hours. I read review because it helps me to chose my games because i don't have much money (and i suppose that i am not alone)

What happends if you read a review and the reviewer say the game gets damn boring, but then maybe 1 year later you pick up the game at a cheap price and find it very cool to play?

Its not like i dont read reviews, i do that sometimes because i like to read what people think of the game thats being reviewed. But opinions can be so different so i will try the game before i make up my own opinion about it, not going by what other people say.
 
Top Bottom