storybook77
Member
CB3 said:Maybe is the same reason their thread is half the size of ours.
Maybe because most of us would rather play the game rather show off our e-penis by upping our post count.
Edit: Beaten by Nightz. :lol
CB3 said:Maybe is the same reason their thread is half the size of ours.
CB3 said:Maybe is the same reason their thread is half the size of ours.
LukeSmith said:Michigan
Wow, I watched that like three times before I noticed what was wrong. It really reminded me of this video.Lonestar said:
Lonestar said:We've never used that trick.
I have most of "Football game" GAF on friends list. Figure that's what most of us are doing.
CB3 said:Maybe is the same reason their thread is half the size of ours.
Jerk! :lolLonestar said:The EA website has this new feature, where you can put together the different clips you upload, into one, longer video (even with putting in audio clips with it). So, could be interesting to use.
Here's my test version. Just think of it as Watching me beat Nightz in the playoffs, then having a flashback to a moment from last years college game.
http://www.easports.com/media/play/highlight-reel/22524001
GCQuinton said:
But seriously, two years ago in '09 when everybody started with their powerhouse teams in our league the game just got boring way too quick since everyone's teams were stacked (or close to it) out the gate. Add that to the fact that we only averaged 4-5 human games a season anyway and you're eventually going through the motions since you're always blowing the CPU out.
The way I saw it last year, starting off with the three star teams at least gave everyone a shot to start on equal footing and you actually had to BUILD your program, which is the whole point of dynasty mode anyways. But hey, if people want to start off with a 99 OVR team and do that, more power to 'em.
GCQuinton said:
But seriously, two years ago in '09 when everybody started with their powerhouse teams in our league the game just got boring way too quick since everyone's teams were stacked (or close to it) out the gate. Add that to the fact that we only averaged 4-5 human games a season anyway and you're eventually going through the motions since you're always blowing the CPU out.
The way I saw it last year, starting off with the three star teams at least gave everyone a shot to start on equal footing and you actually had to BUILD your program, which is the whole point of dynasty mode anyways. But hey, if people want to start off with a 99 OVR team and do that, more power to 'em.
Lonestar said:Why are you bringing this over here?
Why do you think I'm pushing to put everyone in the same conference? To avoid "too many" CPU games.
Lonestar said:Late on this (Photobucket didn't get the emailed pictures loaded for a few hours...)
But did anyone else's copy from Dell come in this very odd shipping sleeve?
Matrix said:Yes, the same way. Thankfully it wasn't destroyed.
Lonestar said:Noticing my Thumb, guess I must be double jointed/Hypermobility
I want to say people noticed my thumb on the picture of my "Celebrating USC's Probation Steaks" Gave the ole Thumbs up.
GCQuinton said:
But seriously, two years ago in '09 when everybody started with their powerhouse teams in our league the game just got boring way too quick since everyone's teams were stacked (or close to it) out the gate. Add that to the fact that we only averaged 4-5 human games a season anyway and you're eventually going through the motions since you're always blowing the CPU out.
The way I saw it last year, starting off with the three star teams at least gave everyone a shot to start on equal footing and you actually had to BUILD your program, which is the whole point of dynasty mode anyways. But hey, if people want to start off with a 99 OVR team and do that, more power to 'em.
CB3 said:Maybe is the same reason their thread is half the size of ours.
The NCAA Dynasty we played in '09 with GCQ lasted four seasons or so. The size of the thread doesn't really mean nothing was going on. All you need to do is set up scheduling, write a GG summary if you want, and go on. GCQ even provided his weekly standings, notes, and player of the weeks. Not sure why people knock this kind of stuff.CB3 said:Maybe is the same reason their thread is half the size of ours.
5/6 star teams aren't fun. I really like 2 star team idea. Maybe next year.GCQuinton said:The way I saw it last year, starting off with the three star teams at least gave everyone a shot to start on equal footing and you actually had to BUILD your program, which is the whole point of dynasty mode anyways. But hey, if people want to start off with a 99 OVR team and do that, more power to 'em.
I dunno, i kinda like not having 3 pages of inside jokes and shit talkingCB3 said:Maybe is the same reason their thread is half the size of ours.
KanZolo said:I dunno, i kinda like not having 3 pages of inside jokes and shit talking
KanZolo
Just following the other dynasty.Lonestar said:Then why are you here?
LukeSmith said:scrim anyone?
Lonestar said:Let me log on.
Though, don't have your username :lol
Same, I think it's been down pretty much all day. At least it has been for me.Lonestar said:Been getting some did not connect to season showdown service messages.
DenogginizerOS said:FMT and I just got disconnected in a 17-17 game going to the 4th. Grrr.
CB3 said:FMT always disconnects when he is close to losing. this is nothing new
.DCX said:I guess we are the Minor League of NCAA franchises? :/
DCX
I could only imagine the amount of backlash we would get in the Madden league if we did all that!Striker said:The NCAA Dynasty we played in '09 with GCQ lasted four seasons or so. The size of the thread doesn't really mean nothing was going on. All you need to do is set up scheduling, write a GG summary if you want, and go on. GCQ even provided his weekly standings, notes, and player of the weeks. Not sure why people knock this kind of stuff.