I'm admitedly a little baffled by the
Pitchfork review. While they accurately point out the range & strength of SP's sound, they go on to downplay Zeitgeist's sound as largely being one-dimensional which I don't think is particularly accurate. Granted, it's heavier on the whole (though I'd say it's not far from being on par with the heaviness of Machina) and there aren't any of the acoustic-tinged sets we saw on earlier albums, but it's not a balls-to-the-wall album like heavier acts are akin to. There definitely seems to be an overriding trend of really knocking on Billy's use of his own voice as backup vocals and laying on the synth at times, though I never quite understood the inherent hatred for the methods in reviews. By and large, I think he utilizes them rather well save on tracks like Pomp & Circumstance and its ilk. Knocking him for his shitty lyrics is fine by me, but I never mistook BC for Bob Dylan and just immersed myself in the melodies and rythyms of the music. Also,
.
That
AllMusic review was atrocious. It spent more time launching a series of implicit and explicit personal attacks on BC than it did on the album whatsoever. It's only saving grace was when it referred to Jimmy Chamberline as someone "who came across like an old metalhead on the prowl for freaky chicks." That's some comedy gold!