*Veelks out*
....
But nah, I said I'm done making Veelks for this thread for a while, and I am. Writing out an essay on why KLK is good as a response to why OP is not would be tantamount to just continuing what I've been doing.
I'll just say this regarding the apparent contradiction: I have plenty of reasons for why I enjoy KLK. It does some interesting things with sexuality, and it's clumsy earnestness is endearing in a way that OP never was, with a lot of actually really interesting character development, specially regarding Satsuki, and it's just flat out hugely entertaining the way GL was. I wrote out an essay at one point with how it depicts sexuality regarding both the fanservice and how Ragyo molests her daughter. It's actually doing something interesting with the concept, as opposed to OP with how it's just....there. And as Sol said, there's also the fact that it's telling a different kind of story than OP with more sophisticated worldbuilding that it compromises in it's narrative telling.
But if you want to call me a hypocrite for liking KLK and not OP....eh, you're probably not entirely wrong. I don't have a set mathematical formula that dictates whether I like a show or not. There are too many variables that go into viewing a show, including who I am at the time of viewing. I can't even tell you what comes first, whether I like a show and then try to figure it out, or whether I first analyze it and then discover afterwards what I really think of it. Sometimes my feelings change in the process of analysis, sometimes they remain grudgingly the same. I can hate one show for doing one thing, then turn around and like a show that does the same thing. We can debate whether that aspect has the same effect on both shows, or maybe if it's appropriate to one but not the other, or whether there are simply other factors that make it less auspicious, but at the end of the day, we love what we love. I don't pretend it's entirely rational.