• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

OpenAI announces "The Stargate Project" - a 500 billion endeavor for new AI infrastructure in the USA

SJRB

Gold Member



Grok summary
The X post from OpenAI announces the Stargate Project, a new venture aimed at investing $500 billion over four years to build AI infrastructure in the United States. This initiative, starting with an immediate deployment of $100 billion, is intended to secure American leadership in AI, create numerous jobs, and boost the economy globally. The project also aims to support U.S. re-industrialization and enhance national security. Key partners include SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX, with SoftBank handling financial aspects and OpenAI operational responsibilities. The project will involve collaboration with tech giants like Arm, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Oracle, starting with construction in Texas. This initiative builds on existing partnerships, particularly with Microsoft and NVIDIA, and is seen as a crucial step towards developing AI, especially AGI, for humanity's benefit.




ThePrimeagen usually has pretty knowledgeable takes.


Absolutely insane things are happening in tech / AI these last weeks.
 
Last edited:

sono

Gold Member
Huh? Open AI isn't getting $500M. Open AI, Oracle, and Softbank (and a couple of others) are committing the $100M (eventually $500M over the next four years) to it.
some noughts missing ?

I read 500Billion not million

who is putting up 500Billion over 4 years or 125Billion a year on avg ?
 
Last edited:

sono

Gold Member
g3o9eov3.gif
 

Hugare

Member
lol at Elon's reply. Still so mad at OpenAI.

This amount of cash is just nuts.

I still dont know how to feel about AI's fast development. What gives me a little hope is that Altman is no Zuck or Musk.
 

Ballthyrm

Member
All I see is kickback for Tech giants supporting Trump.
AI has yet to make a lot of money, sure the potential is here but so is Fusion.

That's a lot of money for potential. Fusion on the other hand, we know everyone need energy. Where is the 500B for Fusion ?

I don't think the private sector needed that public money. They would have invested anyhow.
Public money should go to high risk, high return that wouldn't get funded by private capital.

Like NASA should be doing, stuff like DARPA, ARPA-E, etc
 

FeralEcho

Member
Some powerful technology is coming our way in the next decade. Let's hope we can use it for the better.
"for the better"
Austin Powers Doctor Evil GIF


This will only make the poor poorer,the rich richer and the general population more confused than ever before with the level of manipulation and indoctrination that AI will be a part of worldwide through social media,tv networks and across various entertainment media.
 
Meanwhile, in Europe,

At this point I'm convinced Brussels and the WEF actually want to see Europe become irrelevant. The amount of policies that stifle business (climate), agriculture (some of our nations largest export) and (high-tech) innovation at an increasing rate is staggering and alarming.
 
Last edited:

Ballthyrm

Member
They’re not getting public money. They’re the ones investing.

Ah,I jumped to conclusion and I misunderstood that. If it's private money, then I'm okay with it.
I guess we can still expect big tax breaks though, and depending on your political leaning you can consider that public money.
 
Last edited:

SJRB

Gold Member
Meanwhile, in Europe,


The EU is the land of regulators. Career politicians, people who never have actually built something in their entire life. All they know is how to regulate.

It is so deeply embedded into the system, so fundamentally engrained into the EU's political DNA that they actually openly celebrate moments of regulation like they've achieved a victory, that they've made a difference. They are actually proud of the plastic bottle cap and the forced USB-C.


F9MuJrrW0AAoOBT



There's no coming back from this.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
The EU is the land of regulators. Career politicians, people who never have actually built something in their entire life. All they know is how to regulate.

It is so deeply embedded into the system, so fundamentally engrained into the EU's political DNA that they actually openly celebrate moments of regulation like they've achieved a victory, that they've made a difference. They are actually proud of the plastic bottle cap and the forced USB-C.


F9MuJrrW0AAoOBT



There's no coming back from this.
I was in London recently talking with someone. I said I was in AI. They said, “oh, that’s my field too. Public policy, I’m going into government to regulate AI.”

👀
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
What is "AI infrastructure" exactly?

Improved internet bandwidth and more data centers, making the internet better fir all of us? Enhanced power grid and power production that makes it more reliable for all of us? Or just an "off grid" power and data network that ONLY supports AI and would let it function even if the 'civilian' grid were....smashed?
 

Ballthyrm

Member
The EU is the land of regulators. Career politicians, people who never have actually built something in their entire life. All they know is how to regulate.

It is so deeply embedded into the system, so fundamentally engrained into the EU's political DNA that they actually openly celebrate moments of regulation like they've achieved a victory, that they've made a difference. They are actually proud of the plastic bottle cap and the forced USB-C.


F9MuJrrW0AAoOBT



There's no coming back from this.

There is three big problem with the EU.
- market size, you can't make something for the whole EU following the one set of rule like you can in the USA to access the hundred of millions of population
- regulation environment, way too many preventives rules for something that you don't even know if it's going to work or not
- capital risk, you just can't raise enough money, and the money you can raise is very expensive, why bother get 5M€ for 20% when you can get 5M$ for 10%

What is really sad is that all that is killing innovation from the get go.
Mistral AI ( France) is forced to follow crazy regulation so even if they have great ideas they can't compete with the US regulation environment.
Deepmind (United kingdom) had to go be bought by Google to have even a chance to get enough money to make what they wanted, they would never have succeeded without American investment.
 
Last edited:
Ah,I jumped to conclusion and I misunderstood that. If it's private money, then I'm okay with it.
I guess we can still expect big tax breaks though, and depending on your political leaning you can consider that public money.
If you ever want to know if the US President can do something on his own or if he needs congress to approve of it, just ask yourself if money needs to be spent on it. If the answer is yes, then he needs congress to get it done.
 

ProtoByte

Weeb Underling
lol at the butthurt

Gh4KAtVboAAFMIG
He's not totally wrong. You see big numbers like this get floated in pseudo-governmental circles/organizations, and the money never quite comes to the stated level when all is said and done.

In any case, I do not think it should feasibly cost 500 billion to advance AI tech. I do not believe in AGI though.
 

Mistake

Member
I was in London recently talking with someone. I said I was in AI. They said, “oh, that’s my field too. Public policy, I’m going into government to regulate AI.”

👀
I give the EU credit for regulating ports and cables. Having so many electronics on different stuff became a total nightmare at one point.

As for the news, that's an incomprehensible amount of money. But having Japan on your side for developing AI is a definite win
 
Last edited:

Griffon

Member
This was the most hush hush way to say they want to build a few nuclear reactors.

America's irrational fear of nuclear energy is limiting their capabilities for no good reason.
 
I was in London recently talking with someone. I said I was in AI. They said, “oh, that’s my field too. Public policy, I’m going into government to regulate AI.”

👀
If only Boris hadn't lost his last remaining braincells bonking Carrie then Dominic Cummings would have culled the civil service and these morons would be behind the counter at Burger King.
 

rm082e

Member
I still don't think this is going where people think it's going. I'm all for building new power plants because we need those anyway, but I'm still not seeing the mass use case for ML. Highly specific tasks, sure. But I don't see this as the next automobile, internet, or smart phone.

Worth reading
 
Top Bottom