Ya they're trying to get sound bites, and she's not giving them any. Need to make their own.
|OT| Hillary Clinton testifies before the House Select Committee on Benghazi
- Thread starter BertramCooper
- Start date
- Status
Ya they're trying to get sound bites, and she's not giving them any. Need to make their own.
Arrogant Bastard
Banned
I'm pretty sure that is part of the record and she was there...so I can link her to it like the blowhard linked her to a statement by Carney.
IchigoSharingan
Member
she is. they are rolling so fast it looks like a still frame.
Are you serious?
FloydtheFathead
Member
Yup, exactly the same. No difference at all
Just look at Roskum's "questions" and Duckworth's questions. No difference between the two.
lol, god what a joke this is.
Nailed it.
underneath the hillary-ty
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Absolutely not. I mean, just listen to what these fools are saying.
Maybe you should try actually listening, not just watching.
EDIT: well you got me
User 463088
Banned
You can't knock my girl Hillary off her shit.
She knows what she's talking about.
There's no way I wouldn't have screamed at the asshole (R) from Illinois.
Asshole (R) is a redundancy.
She knows what she's talking about.
There's no way I wouldn't have screamed at the asshole (R) from Illinois.
Asshole (R) is a redundancy.
Veritigo_X
Member
Oh shit, incoming gotcha?
Brawndo Addict
Banned
Politics aside that was good dramatic posturing from that guy earlier precisely because it's one of those questions/issues where the real answer is not palatable and sounds worse than it is. In any project or industry, there's only so much money/resources you can spend on things. People are going to die during mega-construction projects accidentally, it's not an issue of not caring or not having safety standards, but you can't prevent everything when you have limited resources. That doesn't mean you can't misappropriate, but there's a difference between intentionally doing something bad and making a reasonable decision based on only retrospectively incomplete or erroneous information.
DOWN
Banned
false alarm as always. they think they got her and they scatter looking for more questions once she answers
She already won. We dont even need to play no games.
She's been great so far.
All of the republicans (expect for one lady) are making a fool of themselves. They've done nothing be asked gotcha questions and she's completely shit on them each time.
[edit]
Tammy Duckworth is the one who isn't being a total shithead.
@lizadonnelly, another live cartoonist on Twitter:
"Rep Susan Brooks asks some extremely specific questions. #BenghaziCommittee "
FloydtheFathead
Member
Isn't she also a former veteran who lost her legs?
Matt_
World's #1 One Direction Fan: Everyone else in the room can see it, everyone else but you~~~
For the people that already decided she was guilty before this, shes still guilty
Nothing the republicans have said will have stuck on her, no gotcha moments
if anything she comes across well due to how well she's composed herself and kept her cool. It's actually very impressive and certainly makes her look presidential
BertramCooper
Banned
WHEN DID YOU TALK TO PERSON THREE YEARS AGO BE SPECIFIC
Spider from Mars
tap that thorax
Y or N
teruterubozu
Member
or supremely evil, depending on your stance, of course.
Officerrob
Banned
Why didn't you call him on the phone and say you were worried about him? Seriously? This is her fucking question?
FloydtheFathead
Member
Yes.
Currently ~10 points ahead of the Republican incumbent.
That's why I thought her name was familiar. She seems competent and can be a star for the Democratic Party
Spider from Mars
tap that thorax
Clinton should have had talks with everyone who worked for her every single day.
- Status