RiccochetJ
Gold Member
Asus version has it.
It's $100?
Asus version has it.
Asus version has it.
If you just want to fuck around with Android on your TV just buy one of these for $67 shipped today. It's dual core and has a better GPU than the Tegra 3. Plug in a USB controller and run all the emulators you want. Supports MicroSD, Android 4.0, Google Play Market place. Develop your own Android software if you want. The barrier for entry there has always been low.
Stupid question, but how do you interact with this? USB mouse and keyboard, I'd imagine...?
[*]March 2013 does not seem like a realistic launch date at all, and as a backer of a few Kickstarter projects, delays (massive delays) are likely
[/LIST]
What leads you to this conclusion? I'm not going to be shocked by delays, but do we really know enough to have a real opinion on how realistic that goal seems?
They don't have any business model other than hardware profits.
It's my impression most people love the hardware design, even though I'm not fond of it as well. Bad name? Wii was a bad name to begin with - I love the Ouya name. I disagree with your view on games, I'm buying this console exactly to play Canabalt, Minecraft and all those Android games.
But yeah, they should release more info about what the games are tied to (probably your profile) etc. And yup, only something like 30.000 have backed the Kickstarter yet, it's not a big install base, let's hope they'll get more buyers as they get out the first consoles to people.
What leads you to this conclusion? I'm not going to be shocked by delays, but do we really know enough to have a real opinion on how realistic that goal seems?
Arguing about name and hardware design is tired and irrelevant. But you're probably right about the delay, I imagine they probably aren't ready to fulfill this level of demand within the same timeframe. Kind of like how DoubleFine anticipates their game may not be released this year because their stretched funding allowed them to make the game longer.
Both of these things neglect the fact that this is piggy backing on IOS and Andriod development. Developers can develop for those platforms and easily port this one with added controller support (something a lot of gamers crave). There may not be a lot of games you want now but ask yourself this: when cool new games come out on andriod/ios would you rather play them there or on your big TV with controller support?
It seems reasonable to me. They have a prototype. They have the best part of 9 months to get that prototype to manufacture. That's a long time for the software side of things to be polished and ready for when the first units roll off the production line. They may miss the target but I don't think it's an outrageous date.
Now this is something I can work with. Thank you. You are a gentleman and a scholar.
100 USD seems weirdly cheap, I don't understand how this is possible and profitable
It's my impression most people love the hardware design, even though I'm not fond of it as well. Bad name? Wii was a bad name to begin with - I love the Ouya name.
I think you and I have successfully established a new console benchmark standard. Cheers.
Instead of writing a really long post and it getting over looked, I wrote about my feeling on Ouya on my website.
I think Ouya is a really interesting idea and project, and I want to see it succeed. However, I think there are some glaring problems, and that is what I write about.
Summarized, here is each point quickly:
- Bad name
- Ugly hardware
- Almost no details on DRM, App Store, or Content Distribution
- No details on what purchases are tied to
- Almost no details on the long term plan of the product. If you are asking people to invest early, this is a must
- Not nearly enough was shown off to sell me on the device. The project is not far enough along to warrant me already supporting it financially.
- Scary small install base from the point of a developer. If it hits 300k-500k people purchasing it, I don't know if that's enough
- No games shown off that I care about. Canabalt, I've played it on iOS, Android, my computers, PS3, and PSP. Minecraft? Show me something else. Minecraft is on every device I own and it is stil the best on the intiial platform it was released on, PC.
- 100 USD seems weirdly cheap, I don't understand how this is possible and profitable
- March 2013 does not seem like a realistic launch date at all, and as a backer of a few Kickstarter projects, delays (massive delays) are likely
Please, please, please point out any glaring problems with my problems. I would love to talk more about it and learn more.
People really need to stop thinking about this like a traditional console. It's $99, you could easily release an updated version every year and let the customers and developers decide what to support. It's no different then the constant stream of new smart phones. As a new one is released that doesn't mean the old one is instantly outdated, but the shift of apps and games starts to trickle to the new hardware, and eventually the consumer decides to upgrade.
It seems reasonable to me. They have a prototype. They have the best part of 9 months to get that prototype to manufacture. That's a long time for the software side of things to be polished and ready for when the first units roll off the production line. They may miss the target but I don't think it's an outrageous date.
What's wrong with this claim? It's basically the same price as the Apple TV and more than similar devices like the Roku.
Tegra3 quad-core processor
1GB RAM
8GB of internal flash storage
HDMI connection to the TV, with support for up to 1080p HD
WiFi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth LE 4.0
USB 2.0 (one)
Wireless controller with standard controls (two analog sticks, d-pad, eight action buttons, a system button), a touchpad
Android 4.0
It does not seem like there is enough time to properly market it, further develop it post-Kickstarter, test it, manufacturer it, and get it to market by March 2013. I honestly expect this to be released Holiday 2013, as that seems far more realistic.
Alright, so here is why I think it is weird. I may be totally wrong since I am not largely familiar with the world of hardware manufacturer.
1. They are releasing this with half-decent specs. Between the processor, amount of ram, internal memory, bluetooth, and wifi it seems like it's full featured.
2. It is coming with a controller. That's definitely an added cost to the system.
3. They haven't announced, as far as I know, any partnership with a major hardware manufacturer. Buying in bulk/partnership definitely decreases the cost of things quite a bit.
It does far more, as far as I can tell, than the Apple TV or Roku.
What's wrong with this claim? It's basically the same price as the Apple TV and more than similar devices like the Roku.
Alright, so here is why I think it is weird. I may be totally wrong since I am not largely familiar with the world of hardware manufacturer.
1. They are releasing this with half-decent specs. Between the processor, amount of ram, internal memory, bluetooth, and wifi it seems like it's full featured.
2. It is coming with a controller. That's definitely an added cost to the system.
3. They haven't announced, as far as I know, any partnership with a major hardware manufacturer. Buying in bulk/partnership definitely decreases the cost of things quite a bit.
It does far more, as far as I can tell, than the Apple TV or Roku.
So you pretty much bashed the system by a lot of problems?.
None of it is bashing. It's me explaining what I see wrong with it and expressing how I feel. I think the idea is great and as a player and developer I want to see something like this exist, but I don't think it is perfect or the best thing ever.
A lot of the Internet is super pumped, and rightfully so, but I think it is good to be aware of the problems and issues that exist or may exist.
I am not jumping in this thread to say "OUYA SUX MAN", I am jumping in to try and discuss and talk about it.
But, we really have no idea where they are in the process. Again, I expect delays, but we really have no clue right now. They could come out tomorrow and say they are ready to start producing the hardware as soon as they get the Kickstarter funds for all we know.
Nexus 7 is $200 and supposedly about $160 to make, with a good screen and a battery. So there's a bit of the cost gone.
But, we really have no idea where they are in the process. Again, I expect delays, but we really have no clue right now. They could come out tomorrow and say they are ready to start producing the hardware as soon as they get the Kickstarter funds for all we know.
Nexus 7 is $200 and supposedly about $160 to make, with a good screen and a battery. So there's a bit of the cost gone.
That is the thing. That isn't their goal!! Their goal is $100m via VC. The kickstarter is just a gimmick that they can take to VC/Angel Investment groups and show them demand. They have admitted as much already.seems like an excellent idea.. thats why its already 3x achieved its goal..
If we have no idea where they are in the process, then why are people so happy to throw money behind it and support it?
I think people need to learn with Kickstarter, especially for higher priced products and projects, that backing something without actually knowing what it is and where it is can be a bad idea.
Kickstarter projects create this team of evangelists for a project that doesn't truly exist yet. It's super frustrating to see Kickstarters for ideas and projects that are barely along yet. IF they are ready to bump into hardware production, they would have shown off more of the hardware and software. At least, they should have.
And yeah, I thought about it in terms of smartphones, but the Nexus 7 is backed by Google and Asus, which is much different than Kickstarter and this firm/design team.
Alright, so here is why I think it is weird. I may be totally wrong since I am not largely familiar with the world of hardware manufacturer.
1. They are releasing this with half-decent specs. Between the processor, amount of ram, internal memory, bluetooth, and wifi it seems like it's full featured.
2. It is coming with a controller. That's definitely an added cost to the system.
3. They haven't announced, as far as I know, any partnership with a major hardware manufacturer. Buying in bulk/partnership definitely decreases the cost of things quite a bit.
It does far more, as far as I can tell, than the Apple TV or Roku.
If we have no idea where they are in the process, then why are people so happy to throw money behind it and support it?
Well, it depends on what type of software is getting made. 9 months is pretty doable for iSO level stuff. Which seems to be the initial target software for this console.9 months to make a game? ~iwata laughs~
People have no idea how cheap low power computing is these days.
That is the thing. That isn't their goal!! Their goal is $100m via VC. The kickstarter is just a gimmick that they can take to VC/Angel Investment groups and show them demand. They have admitted as much already.
Well, it depends on what type of software is getting made. 9 months is pretty doable for iSO level stuff. Which seems to be the initial target software for this console.
Because that's what Kickstarter is for. We're funding the creation of something we want. They came up with the idea for it, we want it, they need money to make it. This is how all Kickstarters work.
iSO... metric? What?
Anyway, the only thing that can be made in 9 months are low-quality mobile games.
Typo... iOS, sorry.
And weren't those some of the games they were showcasing in the video?
Because that's what Kickstarter is for. We're funding the creation of something we want. They came up with the idea for it, we want it, they need money to make it. This is how all Kickstarters work.
No. I don't agree with you.
They've got protoype hardware. They've got a prototype interface. What exactly do you expect from a Kickstarter to manufacture something? If it's not funded they don't make it. In this case it already is.There needs to be actual content/something created. There needs to be a demo or a walkthrough. There needs to be something more than a render and an idea.
No. I don't agree with you.
Apparently enough people do to raise $3.7 million dollars.
But he has his own website and everything...
~psst~ They need like hundreds of millions of dollars to start making that thing.
You need something called factories, which this group doesn't have at the moment. Very expensive.
Well, since it's Android, it'd be expected to have Android games.
No one is going to make games specifically for that thing. They're going to make an Android game instead. An install base of a guaranteed billion is better than zero.
There's nothing I said that is to be agreed or disagreed with. I described what Kickstarter is for. The other Kickstarters I've been a part of I haven't received jack all and it's been months since they were funded. All I have is promises. I will receive my deliverable when it's done. One of them in a couple of months, the others well into next year. If I don't I will take it up with whoever ran the Kickstarter. That's how Kickstarter works.
They've got protoype hardware. They've got a prototype interface. What exactly do you expect from a Kickstarter to manufacture something? If it's not funded they don't make it. In this case it already is.
Apparently enough people do to raise $3.7 million dollars.
But he has his own website and everything...
Because there's no factories in China that will make anything for anyone in a relatively short time frame. No siree. I swear some people have no concept of how cheap consumer electronics are produced these days.
I can play Minecraft and PS1 games on this?
Sold.
You're definitely right. It will be super interesting to see how it develops over the next 9 months!
And some people have no concept on the logistics of manufacturing an electronic product.