Really?
The petition is reactionary, yes, but if it turns out that terrorists are amongst the Syrian refugees, can you really blame the population at large for turning everyone away? It's OTT but I'd hardly call people 'morons', or more of a worry than ISIS..
Really?
The petition is reactionary, yes, but if it turns out that terrorists are amongst the Syrian refugees, can you really blame the population at large for turning everyone away? It's OTT but I'd hardly call people 'morons', or more of a worry than ISIS..
Really?
The petition is reactionary, yes, but if it turns out that terrorists are amongst the Syrian refugees, can you really blame the population at large for turning everyone away? It's OTT but I'd hardly call people 'morons', or more of a worry than ISIS..
The amazon.fr homepage is fairly tasteful.
Really?
The petition is reactionary, yes, but if it turns out that terrorists are amongst the Syrian refugees, can you really blame the population at large for turning everyone away? It's OTT but I'd hardly call people 'morons', or more of a worry than ISIS..
I'm not sure if you are aware a small group of people killed and maimed hundreds last night as easy as walking out the front door and there's literally hundreds of thousands of people arriving daily from the same place they originated from.
Yeah, people are concerned,maybe if more concern was heeded sooner something could have been done to stop it.
But as long as, for instance, President Obama does not even publicly recognize that there is a link between religious ideology and terrorism, how can the public start to demand that the supporters of such religious ideology should be sanctioned for that.
President Barack Obama said Wednesday that he refuses to describe the Islamic State and al Qaeda as groups fueled by "radical Islam" because the term grants them a religious legitimacy they don't deserve.
"They are not religious leaders; they are terrorists," Obama said during remarks at a White House event on countering violent extremism. "We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam."
Obama said the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, also known as ISIS or ISIL, is "desperate" to portray itself as a group of holy warriors defending Islam. It counts on that legitimacy, he said, to propagate the idea that Western countries are at war with Islam, which is how it recruits and radicalizes young people.
"We must never accept the premise that they put forward, because it is a lie," he said.
The president said the Islamic State and al Qaeda do draw selectively from Islamic texts to try to justify that they are in a religious war. But, he added, that doesn't mean they speak for the more than 1 billion Muslims who reject the group's hateful ideology and violence.
"They no more represent Islam than any madman who kills in the name of Christianity or Judaism or Buddhism or Hinduism," he said. "No religion is responsible for terrorism. People are responsible for violence and terrorism."
Hardly surprising. Hasn't even started to snowball yet.A government petition in the UK to stop all immigration until ISIS is defeated has hit over 100k signatures in less than 15 hours...
Perhaps this attack was done deliberately to make countries refuse refugees and have these people come back under their control.
Profitable for the people who get to keep the money the States spend.
Everybody going into war as a soldier has the willingness to die for their country or cause. Religion is obviously a factor but the very concept of war in all forms depends on people willing to die for a larger idea that is quite often not religious at all.
I just woke up to this news. It's absolutely heart wrenching. :*(
Google translation is very hard to read, sorry ^^. Anyway, I still think you have to wipe out ISIS first. I can't see another way
Problem is, this 'infitesimal chance' doesn't seem so small in the wake of events such as Paris. So people tend to overreact, hence the petition.These people must be terrified of driving to work each morning if the infinitesimal chance of them getting blown up by a terrorist worries them.
Is there proof where the terrorists were from?
If the passports reports are true, that would be a good hypothesis.
Passports could also be fake but the goal would be the same.
Of course it's not the answer, but terror attacks tend to invoke irrational responses.Yes. You have the VAST majority trying to escape chaos, and live a normal life, and to just sit there and say fuck all of you because of a few horrendous people is not the answer.
A portion of Syria didn't want him, but he still had majority support.
A large portion of America doesn't want Democrats, and in the UK, Conservatives, doesn't mean you can just overthrow the government, or request other nations help support and/or arm a rebellion.
There are many things that are messed up in Islam, but two things that are quite straight forward and clear are the ban against harming unarmed civilians, and suicide. How these terrorists commit both of these things, and then expect their God to be chill about it, boggles the mind.It's not the sole component, but if you think that the expectation of paradise through martyrdom played no role at all when those terrorists blew themselves up yesterday after having already killed many tens of people, then you are just blind to the role of religion here. I would guess that it's actually very unattractive and hard to blow yourself up unless you have certain beliefs to support you in that strategy.
Typical, you keep avoiding my point. Yeah, you got the answers to eliminate ISIS, but do you got a way to eliminate the deaths of innocents at their hands in the western world? If not, fuck off?
Oh, right, you want the western world to eliminate them to end all suffering across the world. Awesome.I don't represent the western world, and I'm sure you don't represent Islam. But if the argument you're presenting is that the west needs to eliminate ISIS to keep their homes safe, than again, sincerely, fuck off.Naive
Islam is a religion of more than a billion people. Democracies self regulate, but the religion of peace doesn't? You present so many strawmen regarding who are 'true' ISIS members but fail to realize that ISIS members have a unifying belief in the elimination of apostates(which we all are); but you continue to present nonsensical explanations for their existence with things like some of them "are rich", "are well educated", "have different motivations", and then end your argument by saying the only solution to this is by violently murdering them. Really? AND then, you have the audacity to go ahead and call people naive. Present some empirical data, if you're going to make broad statements of a particular fundamentalist group fitting a mold you've created. The burden of proof is yours. And I don't think you know the the half of it. Groups like ISIS are retribution against western interests. They are creations of the west. Short term violence will not solve this problem. I will again emphasize that it is naive to believe it will.
In summation, you call someone naive for suggesting the answer is not violence, and then contend that the violent removal of extremists is the answer. Brilliant. Yep, you got the answers and fuck me for suggesting otherwise!
It is rich how you barely grasp the English language and still accuse me of not paying attention. It seems like you know how to solve ISIS problem yet no one else does! Honestly, you should reread all your shitty posts before your next attempt at a reply, for coherence's sake. But I don't have faith in your comprehension so for that, I must say bye.
A government petition in the UK to stop all immigration until ISIS is defeated has hit over 100k signatures in less than 15 hours...
Problem is, this 'infitesimal chance' doesn't seem so small in the wake of events such as Paris. So people tend to overreact, hence the petition.
yeah they " found passports " on bodies of blown up kamikaze, like the found passport of the pilots in 9/11 I always have a hard time figuring out how but okay
The amazon.fr homepage is fairly tasteful.
Perhaps? Looks like most likely.Perhaps this attack was done deliberately to make countries refuse refugees and have these people come back under their control.
Hardly surprising. Hasn't even started to snowball yet.
People are genuinely terrified. Can't blame 'em.
Just curious, but how is going to war profitable? The Iraq war cost United States a lot of money.
Last night I recall reading something about planned attacks on Rome, London and Washington. Was that ever confirmed to be directly from Daesh, or was it just a twitter rumour?
People overreacting are part of the problem.
Still, I expect the UKIP/BNP types are masturbating furiously about all of this.
Yes but the overwhelming majority does it in the name of religion, islam in particular.
But not without the motivation of a death cult ideology. This is, to my knowledge, universal and apparent in examples like Japanese kamikaze pilots. And the idea of being particularly rewarded when sacrificing yourself for the cause is the most extreme manifestation of such a death cult ideology.
The amazon.fr homepage is fairly tasteful.
Same one in America right now.
Assad has killed hundreds of thousands of Syrian and purposefully targets hospitals and keeps people he dislikes in camps, the Syrian people will never accept him as head of state ever again. If you manage to destroy Al-Nursa and ISIS while protecting Assad's government, there will shortly be another terror group that forms out of the sheer anger towards Assad.
If the passports reports are true, that would be a good hypothesis.
Passports could also be fake but the goal would be the same.
Helping Assad is a very short term solution, though. Syrians don't want him anymore and he's unable to control the country. That's how that whole mess started. He answered to protests with extreme violence and it escalated from there. I think the "proposed" Russian plan is actually a good starting point, but it pretty much involves replacing Assad in an election.
ISIS is more than dudes carrying AK's, is an insidious ideology that is making their way into the population. Every bomb, every aerial attack, every invasion, is making that idea to expand between people more easily.
I agree with you, but I feel bad calling people stupid for being afraid. We have really good lives in the west, a lot of us aren't used to... This sort of thing. I imagine that people in Paris right now are terrified, and almost every ounce of their human nature is going to tell them to keep away the immigrants, to be wary of Muslims, to avoid large events, etc. For those who can fight that, I have nothing for respect, for those who can't, I just feel bad for.Still stupid though. Turn away thousands of persecuted people who face death, torture, starvation, poverty, war, rape etc, because of an insignificant chance something bad may happen to me as a result of an even more insignificant number of twats? No thanks. I'd rather not let cowardice or selfishness Lord over me, and do the more selfless and humane thing, and save a far greater number of lives. We have intelligence services and security do manage the rest, and so far in the UK they've done a fairly decent job.
yeah they " found passports " on bodies of blown up kamikaze, like the found passport of the pilots in 9/11 I always have a hard time figuring out how but okay
Just plain speculation, but these suicide bombers must have killed themselves outside of crowds, so it should be possible to identify what belonged to them, if it survived the blast.yeah they " found passports " on bodies of blown up kamikaze, like the found passport of the pilots in 9/11 I always have a hard time figuring out how but okay
I didn't write anything about that, though. I answered to a post that promoted talks with and support of Assad as a solution.
.de and .co.jp same. I think they use that for every amazon site right now.
And unfortunately a shocking number of Americans think it is profitable for the country too, probably because that's kind of the simplified version you're taught in most American history classes. I remember very clearly when we studied the Great Depression and were told that war is what ended economic decline. "War always kickstarts a struggling economy." They really forgot to put it in the context of the time, at least in my class.
I still know people who think going to war "helps" they economy, but maybe they believe in trickle down economics too.
I worry that this sentiment isn't just with the UKIP and their ilk anymore, I think it's shifting to the general population. I'm not in the UK at the moment but if that petition is anything to go buy, terrorism is winning.People overreacting are part of the problem.
Still, I expect the UKIP/BNP types are masturbating furiously about all of this.