• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

PDZ Clips

Shompola said:
Destructive criticisim does indeed make you a hater. People tend to fail to see the difference between constructive and destructive criticism...


No.

You retards just use the word "hater" when you dont want to make a counter argument or admit something is wrong.
 
sp0rsk said:
No.

You retards just use the word "hater" when you dont want to make a counter argument or admit something is wrong.
Yes.

I'm quite sick of starting an argument only to be hit with the whole "WHY YOU BASH IT?! YOU JUST A HATER!!!!!" attitude. That doesn't interest me in the least.

Discussing the negative points of something is quite interesting. If everyone were to enter the thread with nothing but praise, we'd have no discussions.
 
dark10x said:
Yes.

I'm quite sick of starting an argument only to be hit with the whole "WHY YOU BASH IT?! YOU JUST A HATER!!!!!" attitude. That doesn't interest me in the least.

Discussing the negative points of something is quite interesting. If everyone were to enter the thread with nothing but praise, we'd have no discussions.


EATIN CROW HATER XBOX THREE SIXTY WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
 
I hate you. I hate you. I hate you. I don't even know you, but I hate you. I hate your guts. I hope all the bad things in life happen to you and only to you.
 
Agree with Vas... stop critisising people for having an opinion, and don't assume every negative comment is an example of trolling.

Having said that, I watched the vids today and the death animations/physics didn't seem to pop out at me as much as last night.
Although I think we need the bloke from Edge Magazine who saw it before to tell us if *that's* the merry jig of death that reminded him of GoldenEye... GE felt much more solid, imho.

Anyway, the city looks AWESOME. I mean, it really does... it looks great - everything about it.

I do agree with the people going on about the 3rd person roll cam being jarring, and how annoying it looks on that multiplayer video.
I think it's perhaps a bit over-used, the 3rd person perspective, I think Halo did it well, and PDZ might be overegging the pudding just to get marketable IP/characters for merchandise, I mean... it's not that necessary to go 3rd person for ziplines and climbing ladders is it? (although having said that, IGI and Riddick were fine- I guess it's the rolling that's the biggest concern right now)

I also noticed the M60 had caltrops as the secondary... /me has fond memories of being a Scout in TFC... :D
 
Keyser Soze said:
I hate you. I hate you. I hate you. I don't even know you, but I hate you. I hate your guts. I hope all the bad things in life happen to you and only to you.


hater.
 
dark10x said:
Yes.

I'm quite sick of starting an argument only to be hit with the whole "WHY YOU BASH IT?! YOU JUST A HATER!!!!!" attitude. That doesn't interest me in the least.

Discussing the negative points of something is quite interesting. If everyone were to enter the thread with nothing but praise, we'd have no discussions.

Well see, I kind of snapped last week because there was just so much irrational negativity. SOME negativity is cool, and you and I have had a great discussion in this thread, but a lot of the people aren't interested in that. Which is unfortunate because then good discussion is killed by this ridiculous black-and-white stupidity. So when someone DOES bring up some negativity for good discussion all the people that like the game are so defensive and touchy from arguing with the stupid people that you just get lumped in.
 
ThirdEye said:
Parallax mapping is nice but it only emphasizes its CG-ish look.

Well that is one of the major problems with these kind of per pixel texturing effects. They use specular high lights to show off the bump maps, and a side effect is that it can look too plastic or cgish.... Lower the amount of specular high light and the parallax map bumps will be less visible and wont stand out that much. It is a trade off unfortunately with these kind of effects.
 
ThirdEye said:
Parallax mapping is nice but it only emphasizes its CG-ish look.

I don't think it was ever meant to look super realistic.
 
Just seen the movie... and I think it looks good.

The only problem I might have is the 3rd person bits, they seem unnecessary, climbing a ladder and (wire) gliding seems to be automatic (i.e press the action button) which means that you not likely gonna take damage and the roll though look disconcerting.

Other than that, the death animations a fine ( artistic license there ), the ai will be surely better than that and the framerate looks rock solid.
 
fortified_concept said:
Ummmm... did you realize that you're only supporting sp0rsk's claim that some xbox fans don't have any real arguments so instead they start calling people names?


Ass.
 
sp0rsk said:
Game, set, match.

Not the slightest junior. There is a difference between bashing i.e. destructive criticism and explaining yourself of why something isnt right i.e. constructive criticism. If you cant see a difference between the two then you have a problem junior.
 
Let me just say that I'm both hopeful and skeptical for Perfect Dark. I really enjoyed the original and in fact there was some cool and novel ideas that has yet to be bested. The Rare of today is much different from the days of Goldeneye and PD though. I hope we see some expansive levels, sweet gadgets, and great AI.

Watching those vids didn't convince me in either direction. I knew it wasn't going to look nearly as bad as wallguy (MS would have scrapped it instantly) but that's setting the bar too low.

Whoever said that there needs to be more blood spatter is right. I remember that was a big deal in the original and it should be here too. Give me blood baby!
 
Choose Your Wepon

1. Jarhead
2. Moron
3. Jerk
4. Douchebag
5. Idiot
6. Loser
7. Twit
8. Bastard
9. Slut
10. Nimrod
11. Whore
12. Dumbass
13. Numb Nuts
14. Dingleberry
15. Spaz
16. Asswipe
17. Schmuck
18. Pussy
19. Dipshit
20. Goon
 
sp0rks is a blatent Xbox troll, he bashes everything on the damn console. I guess when you have Drinky and MAF doing the same with Nintendo, you have to have someone to bash the others. Balances things out
 
Cerrius said:
wow this thread went to shit :lol
Please tell me you arent shocked. The last 9 out of 10 or so X360 threads seem to have all ended the exact same way. And the posters with admitted biases for other consoles are having a ball (see above).
 
PhatSaqs said:
Please tell me you arent shocked. The last 9 out of 10 or so X360 threads seem to have all ended the exact same way. And the posters with admitted biases for other consoles are having a ball (see above).

Which kills this place. I've never been to a forum group like it. It's like hideous virtual form of Nam.
Christ. Even the mods are biased on this board.
 
Shompola said:
Not the slightest junior. There is a difference between bashing i.e. destructive criticism and explaining yourself of why something isnt right i.e. constructive criticism. If you cant see a difference between the two then you have a problem junior.


Oh obviously theres a difference. However, in this thread and in most other 360 threads as of late any critisism at all is met with "HATER EAT CROW ROFL" Not only does this shit have to stop, its going to stop. And don't give me this semantic "Well its destructive vs constructive" bullshit. What do you want us to say? Every complaint at some point has been met with HATER or "OH NOT THIS AGAIN RIGHT GUYS ROFL". Let me tell you what is fucking destructive. It's this "hater" straw man bullshit.

Fuck the more i think about it the more you are wrong. People have been interjecting constructive critisism. Your whole definition is skewed. Just because its negative doesnt make it destructive. "THIS SHIT SUCKS YOU ARE A WHORE" is destructive, and no surprise it sounds alot like "HES AN XBOX HATER DONT LISTEN TO HIM."

And don't give me this fucking "junior" shit. If you are gonna make a fucking attempt at talking down to me atleast say something more substantial than "IM OLDER THAN YOU IM OLDER THAN YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
 
cyberheater said:
Which kills this place. I've never been to a forum group like it. It's like hideous virtual form of Nam.
Christ. Even the mods are biased on this board.

Go to teamxbox. Speevy can guide you to it. Everyone has the same opinion there so there are no arguments or criticism (which according to your opinion kill this place).
 
fortified_concept said:
Go to teamxbox. Speevy can guide you to it. Everyone has the same opinion there so there are no arguments (which according to your opinion kill this place).



Man, you've obviously never modded the general forum before.
 
sp0rsk said:
Oh obviously theres a difference. However, in this thread and in most other 360 threads as of late any critisism at all is met with "HATER EAT CROW ROFL" Not only does this shit have to stop, its going to stop. And don't give me this semantic "Well its destructive vs constructive" bullshit. What do you want us to say? Every complaint at some point has been met with HATER or "OH NOT THIS AGAIN RIGHT GUYS ROFL". Let me tell you what is fucking destructive. It's this "hater" straw man bullshit.
I agree somewhat. I think I already know the answer, but why not address both sides of the issue? It seems you're placing the blame soley on the people that might overreact to someone being critical. But the people that come in and post "xbot!!!, "how could you think that looks great!!!??", "PS3/MGS4!!!", etc. are at fault just as much (if not moreso).
 
Speevy said:
Man, you've obviously never modded the general forum before.
I saw you mod the general forum at txb once, some dude made a thread with explicit gay pics. You came in, banned the guy, closed the thread but didn't remove the pics. Another mod had to remove the pics.

God you suck :lol
 
fortified_concept said:
Go to teamxbox. Speevy can guide you to it. Everyone has the same opinion there so there are no arguments or criticism (which according to your opinion kill this place).

I dont know what you and Speevy's past history is like, but earlier in this thread you singled out a statement of his and bagged him for no reason other to make yourself feel good. It didnt even make sense.

Some other posts deserved it but not his.
 
sp0rsk said:
Oh obviously theres a difference. However, in this thread and in most other 360 threads as of late any critisism at all is met with "HATER EAT CROW ROFL" Not only does this shit have to stop, its going to stop. And don't give me this semantic "Well its destructive vs constructive" bullshit. What do you want us to say? Every complaint at some point has been met with HATER or "OH NOT THIS AGAIN RIGHT GUYS ROFL". Let me tell you what is fucking destructive. It's this "hater" straw man bullshit.

Fuck the more i think about it the more you are wrong. People have been interjecting constructive critisism. Your whole definition is skewed. Just because its negative doesnt make it destructive. "THIS SHIT SUCKS YOU ARE A WHORE" is destructive, and no surprise it sounds alot like "HES AN XBOX HATER DONT LISTEN TO HIM."

And don't give me this fucking "junior" shit. If you are gonna make a fucking attempt at talking down to me atleast say something more substantial than "IM OLDER THAN YOU IM OLDER THAN YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

I was staying away from this but anyway:

Don't you banned olimario just because he said that the art of X manga author was generic?

Granted that I don't simpatize with olimario, He was just expressing his opinion.
 
PhatSaqs said:
I agree somewhat. I think I already know the answer, but why not address both sides of the issue? It seems you're placing the blame soley on the people that might overreact to someone being critical. But the people that come in and post "xbot!!!, "how could you think that looks great!!!??", "PS3/MGS4!!!", etc. are at fault just as much (if not moreso).


No im just tired of reading threads that are "I think this looks bad" "SHUTUP HATER :lol :lol :lol :lol "

You can ignore a troll or two, but if you have one troll and 5 people replying with this hater bullshit youve got a good chunk of the thread ruined.


Olimario was not banned because of one specific instance. It was just the last in a string of ignorant rants.
 
yoopoo said:
I saw you mod the general forum at txb once, some dude made a thread with explicit gay pics. You came in, banned the guy, closed the thread but didn't remove the pics. Another mod had to remove the pics.

God you suck :lol


I don't quite remember the thread, but I assure you that banning the guy and keeping him from reregistering was my first priority. Public forum.
 
Agisthos said:
I dont know what you and Speevy's past history is like, but earlier in this thread you singled out a statement of his and bagged him for no reason other to make yourself feel good. It didnt even make sense.

Some other posts deserved it but not his.

Nah we just like to argue with each other. I did no such thing though. Can you quote it?
 
fortified_concept said:
Nah we just like to argue with each other. I did no such thing though. Can you quote it?


You replied to me as if I were the one claiming that PDZ looks better than MGS4. All I said was that the MGS4 trailer was neither thrown together nor were the textures the best I had ever seen. I think MGS4 looks much better than PDZ, though.
 
cyberheater said:
Which kills this place. I've never been to a forum group like it. It's like hideous virtual form of Nam.
Christ. Even the mods are biased on this board.
I think you need to visit some other forums.

A quick sample...

Most of these were actual threads, not just posts within a thread...
Anyone who thinks Nintendo "owns" Blizzard, or that Pikmin 2 owns anything... Have got to be the biggest sheep ever. Nintendo makes better RTS games than blizzard? You mean Pikmin? Too bad isn't not even an RTS, a stupid game where you chuck your soldiers in an enemy's direction like bricks at a wall, does not "own" anything. Sheep just shut up. You are losing all of the console battles so now you're trying to find an excuse to pick on hermits? Give me a break. You're in denial.
zomg major cow ownage inside! -- PSP was announced at E3 2003, so companies have had 2 1/2 years to develop for the system...

DS was announced January 2004, almost a year after the PSP announcement... so devs have had almost 1 1/2 years to develop for the DS.

PSP had a year head-start to get more company support than the DS, but the DS still has more 3rd party support and 50 more games in development than the PSP, thus proving that companies like the DS more than the PSP!! The Cows Have BO!!!

llololololololololol ololoolmalalmalamlaml amlalamalalamlamlmal amamalmalmalaalmatchbo

On PD0
OMG, THE TETRIS FIGURES! SO IMPRESSIVE!

lemmins ramble on and on about how gow is graphicly better" than anything on ps3 -- well they dont realize that the crapbox 360 can barely handle gow like doom 3 on the xbox the frame rates xux

while gow on ps3 could run 10x better performance wise 2x better graphicaly

ps it dosent look better than mgs4 whatever lemmings may think
CoD2 on Xflop1.5... Lmao Weak Juice? Lmao how do you expect to play CoD 2 on dis? CoD2 PC, without a doubt, will own the XFlop 180 version. The controls will be superior on kb/mouse.

rofawls @ "next-gen" console
Does it bother lemmings Xbox 360 is causal? -- Don't lemmings find it disturbing that they are going to be getting the casual system? The poor man's computer? Who honestly wants to pay a dime to download a map you could get for free on a computer? And why would anyone want to download music online off of a game console?

Amir0x even owns that kind of thing with links to the Nintendo.com forums...

Amir0x said:
Ok, but I warned you...

PS3 Cell chips melt?



Why can't polygons be round?

Wario, Waluigi, and Bowser are all Bad guys right? (Sample post: "I'm just wondering why all these characters haven't teamed up to try to take over the mushroom kingdom?")

What is MMORPG?

teh poem ("i kept my GCN bow till a month ago when my mom made me toss it... i remember it had an awesome poem by Mr. Miyamoto on teh back. will teh rev box have a poem?? can anyone post teh poem??")

wats a publisher? (Ex Post: wat do day do? wuts thar purpose in a game???)
 
No im just tired of reading threads that are "I think this looks bad" "SHUTUP HATER "

You can ignore a troll or two, but if you have one troll and 5 people replying with this hater bullshit youve got a good chunk of the thread ruined.

It doesnt only happen in xbox threads. It goes both ways and its getting worse.
 
sp0rsk said:
No im just tired of reading threads that are "I think this looks bad" "SHUTUP HATER :lol :lol :lol :lol "

You can ignore a troll or two, but if you have one troll and 5 people replying with this hater bullshit youve got a good chunk of the thread ruined.


Olimario was not banned because of one specific instance. It was just the last in a string of ignorant rants.

So instead of going after the people that are actually trolling the threads you're going after the people that are complaining about the trolling? That's just fucking stupid. Almost all 360 threads are devoid of any real constructive criticism because the majority of the ones that are bitching are the same people that are always bitching in every 360 thread and most of them have made it quite clear they have no intention of even buying the damn system. It gets old and I can certainly understand some people's reactions around here when you see the same tired bullshit from the same posters in every thread.

Go after the problem instead of the response to it.
 
Man, who goes to Nintendo forums, it's cool to be a fan, but shit, that's like readily admitting you read Nintendo Power
 
Speevy said:
You replied to me as if I were the one claiming that PDZ looks better than MGS4. All I said was that the MGS4 trailer was neither thrown together nor were the textures the best I had ever seen. I think MGS4 looks much better than PDZ, though.

Oops. You misunderstood me and it's partly my fault. I was saying that in general about the comparison. That's why I used the "btw". The sentence should have been in another paragragh though, because it wasn't directed to you at all, since you weren't even ccmparing the two. My real quote to you was just the "It is the best looking game we've seen so far."
 
sp0rsk said:
No im just tired of reading threads that are "I think this looks bad" "SHUTUP HATER :lol :lol :lol :lol "

You can ignore a troll or two, but if you have one troll and 5 people replying with this hater bullshit youve got a good chunk of the thread ruined.
But again, you're still ignoring when the opposite happens ("I think this looks great" "XBOT TOTAL!!! :lol :lol") as if all of the blame goes towards the people that post as you describe. It's not a one sided issue at all and the people that are complaining about it shouldnt be made out to be the laughing stock of the forum.
 
Speevy said:
I don't quite remember the thread, but I assure you that banning the guy and keeping him from reregistering was my first priority. Public forum.
Removing the pics should've been the top priority too, since the pics were on a public forum.
 
Top Bottom