BertramCooper said:
So, Pennsylvania tax dollars?
BertramCooper said:
GoldenEye 007 said:I mean it was involuntary on part of the minor.
Scott Paterno said:"Unfortunately," Scott Paterno said, "once that happened, there was really nothing more Joe felt he could do because he did not witness the event. You can't call the police and say, 'Somebody tells me they saw somebody else do something.' That's hearsay. Police don't take reports in that manner. Frankly, from the way he understood the process, he passed the information on to the appropriate university official and they said they were taking care of it. That's really all he could do."
Darkman M said:Made it to page 7, that is quite enough.
Lanbeast said:So, Pennsylvania tax dollars?
JoeBoy101 said:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS?!?
You're not the goddamn prosecutor of this case, Scooter! Its not up to you to decide if there is enough evidence to prove something happened and whose at fault. You had a legitamite accusation with a DIRECT EYEWITNESS statement and your wrinkled decrepit father had an obligation to report it to more than just his boss.
Police take reports on everything. Why don't you let THEM decide whether to take it seriously or not.
Hari Seldon said:One thing that no one seems to be reporting is that the person Joe Paterno reported the incident to was the head of the campus HR and campus police. So Paterno reported it to the correct people.
http://www.postgazette.com/pg/11311/1188148-298.stm
BertramCooper said:If you want to have your day ruined, read the grand jury report in its entirety.
Hari Seldon said:Penn State only gets a little funding from the state. Contrary to its name, it is not a state school.
samus i am said:Did Joe Paterno do what what required of him? Yes. For that reason I think he shouldn't be asked to retire. However, I personally think he could and should have done more.
ChiTownBuffalo said:Well, like I stated earlier, I was friends with Sandusky's son. Its been decades since I was last in contact with him, but I keep wondering what he and the rest of family are going through.
Dude Abides said:Any ideas about why his wife seems to have been completely clueless?
Ken Masters said:But he knew what was going on, to say "hey, he reported something so he's clean" is bullshit, but that's what the sport media will say
samus i am said:But he did report it. He just didn't follow up on it, which he isn't really required to do.
According to Paterno, he wasn't given the gritty details that are described in the grand jury proceedings.Dude Abides said:I think the notion is that when one of your assistants tells you he saw your former DC, who is still closely associated with the athletic department, butt-fucking a ten year old in the shower of your athletic facility, there may be a moral obligation to do something more than the absolute bare minimum.
Schmitty said:According to Paterno, he wasn't given the gritty details that are described in the grand jury proceedings.
Sorry for the double
Schmitty said:According to Paterno, he wasn't given the gritty details that are described in the grand jury proceedings.
Sorry for the double
AndyD said:My question is who is the graduate that witnessed it, and why did he/she not say anything to the police when nothing happened internally after weeks or months or even years?
disagree completely... paterno could go 0-12 and I don't think he should be fired (and I thought the same for bowden)... when a person contributes that much to your university (and hey it's not like Penn St. hasn't been competitive the last decade) you humor that person in a figurehead position until they are in their grave...Ninja Scooter said:Paterno should be gone because he doesn't do shit and is nothing but a figure head. Penn St. should be itching to use this as a reason to run him out of town.
I think it has been found that the unnamed grad assistant is current WR coach McQueary who also told his father what he saw. I'm not too certain that is 100% true.AndyD said:Yea, supposedly he was only told of something inappropriate but not details. So simply based on that you report it and let other take care of it.
My question is who is the graduate that witnessed it, and why did he/she not say anything to the police when nothing happened internally after weeks or months or even years?
BertramCooper said:Or, from State College to State Penitentiary.
Schmitty said:According to Paterno, he wasn't given the gritty details that are described in the grand jury proceedings.
Sorry for the double
Lonestar said:
lush said:Dear God this shit is disturbing. Paterno's career is now completely tarnished, heads need to start rolling and fast.
Are you kidding me? He knew he was a fucking pedophile and still let the guy bring a kid along on a bowl trip and didn't say a word when the guy would bring kids to practice.ChiTownBuffalo said:Whoa whoa whoa.
Just because this happened doesn't mean Paterno all of the sudden ripped off his rubber mask and turned into a monster. Joe Paterno is still a good person, he's just not the paragon of coaching perfection everyone else made him out to be. At worst, he's self interested.
Jerry Sandusky was his friend for I'm assuming 30 or so years. So when he heard about the first allegations back in 98 he reported to the police and the University authorities. Why didn't he get more into it? Would you want to fully delve into what sort of monster your friend/colleague of 30 years is? By knowing less, and completing due diligence of reporting, Joe gets to play both sides, which is totally human. He reports a crime, and he also protects himself. That's completely understandable.
bigtroyjon said:Are you kidding me? He knew he was a fucking pedophile and still let the guy bring a kid along on a bowl trip and didn't say a word when the guy would bring kids to practice.
Paterno may have covered his ass criminally but morally he is just as fucked up as the rest of the people covering this up.
ChiTownBuffalo said:Whoa whoa whoa.
Just because this happened doesn't mean Paterno all of the sudden ripped off his rubber mask and turned into a monster. Joe Paterno is still a good person, he's just not the paragon of coaching perfection everyone else made him out to be. At worst, he's self interested.
Jerry Sandusky was his friend for I'm assuming 30 or so years. So when he heard about the first allegations back in 98 he reported to the police and the University authorities. Why didn't he get more into it? Would you want to fully delve into what sort of monster your friend/colleague of 30 years is? By knowing less, and completing due diligence of reporting, Joe gets to play both sides, which is totally human. He reports a crime, and he also protects himself. That's completely understandable. And from what is coming out, he pretty much kept other schools from hiring Snadusky, which explains the bitterness from Sandusky.
Yeah, I wished he woulda done more. But, I can't say I wouldn't have had the same conflict.
ChiTownBuffalo said:Nope, I am not kidding you.
I am saying that in situations like this, with the length and history of the type of relationship Paterno and Sandusky had, it wouldn't be as black/white as people on the outside see it or want it to be.
ChiTownBuffalo said:Nope, I am not kidding you.
I am saying that in situations like this, with the length and history of the type of relationship Paterno and Sandusky had, it wouldn't be as black/white as people on the outside see it or want it to be.
bigtroyjon said:I guess all I can say is that if you think that a 30 year old friendship is worth allowing someone to rape 10 year olds, then I think you've got some serious mental problems.
krameriffic said:Needs more Herman Cain gif.
http://i.imgur.com/JVeGL.gif[/QUOTE]
ok
ChiTownBuffalo said:Either my writing sucks or your comprehension sucks.
All I said, was that JoePa's action or inaction, was colored by his relationship with Sandusky. I didn't say it was OK, but I'm also saying that it doesn't make JoePa a monster.
Joe Shlabotnik said:Your reaction is colored by your relationship with the family. Which in your case, is perfectly understandable! You spent a lot of time with a seemingly idyllic family which apparently held an unspeakably dark secret, which is very difficult for you to reconcile many years later.
And it's not about something as binary as Paterno being a "monster" or not, or even a "bad person" or not. I don't really know what the official criteria is for "bad people". But ignoring compelling evidence that your old friend is a child rapist is BAD. Really bad, and not in a particularly "understandable" sense. If it's not a black and white issue, then it's a very very very very dark gray, at least.