Herr Starr
Member
Nahyuta may provide good theories yes, but they're usually just theories without any new evidence. Then the game doesn't really lead you to believe why his theories are more credible or more readily accepted so it feels like it's a one-sided trial. They could have leaned towards it more in the Khu'rain cases by implicating a biased judge, but they didn't really give much character to the magistry.
As has been made very clear in the earlier games, the odds are always stacked against the defense in this court system. If the defense cannot remove all other possibilities from the table, the defendant will be found guilty. In other words, if the prosecution can show that there is a way for the defendant to have committed the crime and the defense can't show evidence otherwise (or make a witness confess), the prosecution wins. The courts in Ace Attorney operate under the "guilty until proven innocent" mantra.