Interfectum
Member
For them to outright buy them like this they must like something they are seeing.
Honestly first thing I thought. At this point sony was like “fuck it, let’s just stop hiding this. Square-enix and capcom next”So Jimbo knows that he is probably not blocking ABK so he is not bother hiding acquisitions anymore?
Sony and Firewall signed a 10 year contract with the 5th largest mobile provider in Lithuania and the 19th largest in Vanuatu to get this passedBecause this is the same right?
Sony and Firewall signed a 10 year contract with the 5th largest mobile provider in Lithuania and the 19th largest in Vanuatu to get this passed
Not everyone wants the large third party publishers to be gobbled up. It fucking sucks. I've no issue with the untested companies or companies in partnerships with the major platform holders.Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
Buying studios that own no IPs and hasn’t released any games is pretty much as close as you can get to creating a studio, especially since the first game this studio is making was set to be published by Sony anyway.Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
It's all so intellectually dishonest, or ignorance. Pick one, or both.Not everyone wants the large third party publishers to be gobbled up. It fucking sucks. I've no issue with the untested companies or companies in partnerships with the major platform holders.
I think some of the comments is trying to stick it to the pathetic cheerleaders of consolidation and see if they like the medicine.
Sony's single player output is not changing. They have expanded enough where they have several studios with multiple teams. And the biggest reason why GAAS games consistently fail is because most of them are low budget games that chased trends. Every publisher saw the success of a game like Fortnite and thought they could replicate it for cheap. Sony has the chance to the release high quality polished AAA GAAS games, . The odds of them succeeding are much higher compared to your average studio.1 in 12 are good odds, but at the same time they would be saturating the market with this trash, and people will likely tune them all out.
Right now, COD, PubG, Fortnite and Apex are successful. Can the industry handle even more of these games? There are only so many of these players to go around. Halo came and went. They made it F2P, got 20 million users, and then everyone left after a week. I suspect the same thing to happen to all of these games especially if they launch at $70. If I was Sony, id be sweating bullets at the Suicide Squad reception because thats exactly what their games are going to look like lol. Not to mention looking at the insane sales of Hogwarts, GOW and RE4, and wondering why they invested so heavily in GaaS instead of traditional single player games. Spiderman 2 will literally be their only first party game this year. they shouldve had like 4 of these SP games out this year. they wouldve cleaned up.
My guess is that this is insurance policy in case MS takes CoD exclusive. they want to be ready with their own CoD or Fortnite clone.
P.S It's 12 games and there is factions, horizon mp, bend's new IP, insomniac was also hiring mp devs, Jade Raymond's new studio is doing GaaS, and their other manchester studio is also making a GaaS game. Deviation games, firewalk studios were 2nd party and likely were not included in Jim's 12 GaaS game declaration. MLB wasnt either. GT7 possibly, yes.
I wouldnt be surprised if GG, Insomniac, and other Sony devs are making multiple GaaS games.
Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
Sony did kind of build this studio as they got funding from no one else than Sony all these years. Now Sony is just buying them outright.Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
In a lot of these recent acquisitions Sony has funded their projects by giving them projects to develop before acquiring them especially some of the newer little studios to help them get off the ground and test their skills.Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
This game is scheduled to release next year. Very confident that we'll see it in May/early June.Another Haven situation it seems. Hope we see at least a look at what these have all been working on if they have a showcase.
imagine if they merged this ex-bungie studio with bungie.
Sony said in 2019 that they want fewer games, yet bigger games. So it seems their intent is to do less single player games. I would rather they keep their focus on single player instead of GaaS. But it's their business, so whatever. Spider-Man 2 is out sometime this year, so another good single player game coming our way, then Wolverine 2024.Sony's single player output is not changing.
Because we know for sure Sony can delivery high quality games on a good flow. They are doing that for more than 10 years. Instead of Microsoft who still need to show.Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
They’ve invested in this team practically since their creation. It’s been Sony’s money that has largely allowed them to function.Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
Do they need to merge?imagine if they merged this ex-bungie studio with bungie.
And if you noticed, Layden is no longer with them.Sony said in 2019 that they want fewer games, yet bigger games. So it seems their intent is to do less single player games. I would rather they keep their focus on single player instead of GaaS. But it's their business, so whatever. Spider-Man 2 is out sometime this year, so another good single player game coming our way, then Wolverine 2024.
Capcom keeps getting more and more expensive. Might cost more than what Microsoft paid for Bethesda. Square-Enix is getting cheaper than ever.Square-Enix and Capcom next”
Wow, I thought everyone forgot about MAG. That game was ahead of its time for consoles. Too bad it was too chaotic and unbalanced, but it was FUN AS HELL.I would prefer MAG... but won't say no to SOCOM.
Sony and Firewall signed a 10 year contract with the 5th largest mobile provider in Lithuania and the 19th largest in Vanuatu to get this passed
Warhawk and MAG are two games that might actually work better with a GaaS framework. Gd I miss PS3 era Sony 1P.It will be some shitty online GaaS title that will never reach the likes of Warhawk, MAG & Killzone 2.
Sony said this was their focus going forward.
Worrying about Sony's SP games is the last thing I'd do, to be honest. These MP games are usually coming from new studios.Sony said in 2019 that they want fewer games, yet bigger games. So it seems their intent is to do less single player games. I would rather they keep their focus on single player instead of GaaS. But it's their business, so whatever. Spider-Man 2 is out sometime this year, so another good single player game coming our way, then Wolverine 2024.
Sony wants a top tier FPS if MS gets COD.For them to outright buy them like this they must like something they are seeing.
I can agree with this. I put more hours into GT7 last year than any other game. Their live service model has been stellar so far.Live service by itself is not a problem. COD is live service. Countless games we enjoy are live service. It's often a problem when the game is designed around monetization. But live service does not automatically mean garbage. I think a solid 70% or more of my annual gaming hours are on live service.
They're a studio with over 150 employees made up from Bungie, Raven, Respawn, etc, veterans working on a AAA FPS game that Sony was already funding/publishing.How are they working on a AAA game when they are basically an indie studio....
This should be an accept/decline to enter gaf.Not everyone wants the large third party publishers to be gobbled up. It fucking sucks. I've no issue with the untested companies or companies in partnerships with the major platform holders.
I think some of the comments is trying to stick it to the pathetic cheerleaders of consolidation and see if they like the medicine.
Never heard that quote, but Sony seems fine on the single player front for next few years. Next year, we got Rise of Ronin, Wolverine, and DS2. As long as Sony releases 2 premiere single player games per year on average, I'll have no complaints. Plus they've got good partnering deals with Square Enix with FF16 and FF7 2 (out next year)Sony said in 2019 that they want fewer games, yet bigger games. So it seems their intent is to do less single player games. I would rather they keep their focus on single player instead of GaaS. But it's their business, so whatever. Spider-Man 2 is out sometime this year, so another good single player game coming our way, then Wolverine 2024.
They must have more faith in this game than whatever Deviation is making.
Why people want Sony to buy more studios?
Shouldn't they build their own studios after bungie purchase?
Wouldn't that be better than going again and buying another studio.
edit: joke post just feynoob post reworded. sorry feynoob. lol
Sony wants to launch 10 GaaSes by 2026, so yes almost everything they have in the pipeline is either fully multiplayer (Last of us, next bungie…etc) or has a multiplayer modeAnother F%((/))&%$ multiplayer.