It would never work well because Vita only supports 802.11n... 802.11ax (and even ac) is vastly superior for latency.Just let us remote play from PS5 to Vita.
I imagine Sony wanted to gauge consumer interest before figuring out how much effort to put in marketing this thing. Based on the response, I imagine Sony will market this less than the PSVR2.They said they will release more details "in the coming months" but I feel the same, why bother revealing it at all now if you're just going to give people the exact impression you just put into words?...
Do you really play on your phone or tablet?Yeah i thought the same. Whats the point of that device ? lol
Poo 5 lolThe uber-innovative PU5.
Sony Interactive Entertainment has announced a new PlayStation streaming portable device, ‘Project Q’.
Announced during a PlayStation Showcase event on Wednesday, Project Q is described as “a dedicated device that enables you to stream any game form your PS5 console using remote play over wi-fi”.
According to SIE, the device has an 8-inch 1080p HD screen and all the buttons and features of the DualSense wireless controller.
For now. Thanks to a push of the EU, they are changing their rules. So within the next few years we'll already see big changes, and it would be easily possible on an iOS device.Apple makes it hard to do stuff like this on iPhones.
It's in the verge article, currently you need to have the game installed on your ps5 which does imply that it's just a remote play device. Hopefully they do change that between now and launch.They need to have seamless PS+ integration and streaming on this device.
Otherwise, I don't see a dedicated remote play only device being successful.
I do hope they built actual video streaming tech like what WiiU had or better and it is not just an off the shelf video stream over WiFi solution…The handheld is great.For people with kids who play something else or watch TV the handheld means you can go to another room and play Diablo 4 or factions or scary or gory games you can’t play in front of your kids on the tv.And for people saying why not play on your Tablet this device is also built like a PS5 controller so it has everything the console gameplay has.I think it’s a great idea and a great device.It’s like the switch you can play on the handheld if the tv is not available
This.A sleek and stylish streaming device with DualSense features makes sense, but to just have a tablet sandwiched in between a cut in half controller is ghetto as fuck.
It's been shown time and time again that unless the default launch controller has the feature, most developers will not bother making use of extra hardware features added later.I do hope they built actual video streaming tech like what WiiU had or better and it is not just an off the shelf video stream over WiFi solution…
With a touchscreen, maybe a lot of devs would not really do much with it, but it would be nice for games to have optional dual screen features like Wii U had… there is hope (Wii U had poor execution, the concept was not stupid).
You can probably use a regular controller with it also. And I hate the removable controllers on the switch (also that would be extra cost, and separate batteries in the screen and controller sections so no thanks)But just cutting a DualSense in half and attaching it to a tablet... yeah, nah. If it were like the Switch and detachable, sure.
You can probably use a regular controller with it also. And I hate the removable controllers on the switch (also that would be extra cost, and separate batteries in the screen and controller sections so no thanks)
Good point but wouldn’t the issue be range? I’m sure the Wii U game pad had to stay within like 5m of the console.I do hope they built actual video streaming tech like what WiiU had or better and it is not just an off the shelf video stream over WiFi solution…
With a touchscreen, maybe a lot of devs would not really do much with it, but it would be nice for games to have optional dual screen features like Wii U had… there is hope (Wii U had poor execution, the concept was not stupid).
But it's got a new buttonA phone clip for your DS costs $20.
It costs £349no price indication for the Sony WiiU?
i hope MS have got their own WiiU up their sleeves but it does all the xcloud streaming making it actually useful.
I would be fine with it .Good point but wouldn’t the issue be range? I’m sure the Wii U game pad had to stay within like 5m of the console.
It works best when I have the PS5 on wired/ethernet connection and the game mode is performance/60fps. Works better on Steam Deck with Chiaki than on iPhone with the PS Remote Play app. Still more than playable on the phone depending on the game.Last time I tried, remote play was laggy af. Is remote play better now?
Bulky? It's only an 8 inch display with dual sense controller on it, it shouldn't be too bad, and it will be light, and who knows, may have a stand at the back or even come with a dock (unlikely those will be sold separate). Either way, I'd just use it as intended so isn't an issue at all for me.The issue isn't comfort, is that's bulky. And this thing won't even stand up properly if wanted to use a normal controller with it (why you would when it's a DualSense itself, I don't know).
Detachable controllers do not need to have their own batteries. They could have made it so that they were detachable and then also made a 'grip' to turn them into a slightly wider DualSense.
This thing better retail for 49 if thats all it can do. Doa otherwis
A dedicated gaming tablet akin to the Lenovo Y700 would have been great though.