Amazing.
I'm really surprised me don't have a satellite orbiting every planet in our Solar System. Forgot the rover, let's just collect basic information.
They are tidally locked so I wouldn't think so. Very strange.
The Greek X produces the K sound but is translated to English as chi. The CH makes the same sound as in Christy or Chronos. Not to be confused with the Greek Kappa, but that's a different story.
Interesting, I looked it up, and apparently the Ancient Greek pronounciation would indeed be Karon ([Kh]aron), but the Koine or Modern Greek version would be Charon ([X]aron) (with the ch as in the Scottisch Loch, Dutch/German ach, etc.). But.. what is usual, the ancient or modern greek pronounciation? (and when did the pronounciation change?)
I'm pretty sure the river styx ferry of the underworld isn't French.
How do mountains on Pluto form? Especially "youthful" ones. While that term is relative, I would imagine pluto isn't seismically active with a warm interior and moving plates and faults, like earth.
Goodness, I've just spent a few hours reading Wikipedia articles about robotic space probes within and outside our Solar System for the past few hours. I do love Space! What a shame that most of the juicy space exploration won't be happening for a few hundred years.
Phenomenal stuff.
"Views of Pluto Through the Years
This animation combines various observations of Pluto over the course of several decades."
Wow, all this activity on Pluto means a higher chance of future missions. They said they will come back if there is warranted scientific reasons to and PLuto being geologically active is more than enough reason!
I want, no, I NEED, to see these rocket scientists play kerbal space program.
Wow, all this activity on Pluto means a higher chance of future missions. They said they will come back if there is warranted scientific reasons to and PLuto being geologically active is more than enough reason!
"Views of Pluto Through the Years
This animation combines various observations of Pluto over the course of several decades."
It is a planet. A dwarf planet.
Would you say a dwarf human isn't a human?
This would made the journey significantly longer because half the trip would have been about slowing down enough to be caught by Pluto's gravity well. It already took close to a decade, it would take more than twice as long to actually land.
Plus one of the biggest weight concerns when it comes to launching off Earth is the fuel. Google a random image of a Saturn rocket or the tanks the space shuttles are attached to on launch. The actual space craft is a small fraction. Now considering that they would have to add significantly more fuel for the slow down process and adding more also adds more weight they need to account for with more fuel.
Would be cool if they reclassified Charon as a Dwarf Planet. Then we would have a binary dwarf planet in our solar system.
[/img]http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/pluto-observations-through-the-years.gif[/img]
"Views of Pluto Through the Years
This animation combines various observations of Pluto over the course of several decades."
Yes, sending a craft to orbit or land would probably require sending up a rocket to assemble in space, and then re-launching the probe from there. Also, Pluto's on its way out to greater distances from us, and also off the plane of the ecliptic.
"Views of Pluto Through the Years
This animation combines various observations of Pluto over the course of several decades."
A little off topic. This is from the Rosetta probe:
It's cool to see a flightpath visualized like that. I wonder how fast you could move through space just using gravity assists.
News/Discoveries:
-Pluto may still be geologically active today. Mountains might only be 100 million years old.
-Plutos atmosphere is being lost in space. Its lost about 300 meters of nitrogen
-Charon terrain is varied and reshaped by geologic activity.
It's cool to see a flightpath visualized like that. I wonder how fast you could move through space just using gravity assists.
Wow, all this activity on Pluto means a higher chance of future missions. They said they will come back if there is warranted scientific reasons to and PLuto being geologically active is more than enough reason!
Charron is a common french last name in Québec and it's pronounced sha-ron
There are so many missions that barely get covered at all in the news that it's easy to miss stuff if you aren't looking for it. I don't think I realized we already have another orbiter on its way to Jupiter until the other day.
I say Sharon too due to this. Karon sounds incredibly odd but then again, it doesn't sound as dumb as Stephan = Steven to me.
Best wishes.
I say Sharon too due to this. Karon sounds incredibly odd but then again, it doesn't sound as dumb as Stephan = Steven to me.
Best wishes.
NASA: "Charon has a young surface. Its terrain is different than what we imagined. Possibly still has an active surface as well. Here is still great photo of Charon too."
I forgot about Juno, too. From the recent AMA with The Planetary Society:
There are so many missions that barely get covered at all in the news that it's easy to miss stuff if you aren't looking for it. I don't think I realized we already have another orbiter on its way to Jupiter until the other day.
And missions that have a big explosion of news and then people forget about. Like the fact that we still have two rovers operating on Mars. Opportunity has been rolling around the planet since 2004. 2004. It's intended working life was 90 days. It's been keepin' on for 11 cotdamn years. Voyager 1 launched in 1977. It's still sending back data from interstellar space. NASA does all this stuff on a shoestring, paltry paltry budget. Insulting budget. And meanwhile the F-35 still isn't working yet, sucking up taxpayer money like a black hole.
I mean, how many people even see all the images Curiosity is taking? NASA definitely has a marketing problem, that beautiful vistas of Mars go unseen by most of the public. This was taken today.
And missions that have a big explosion of news and then people forget about. Like the fact that we still have two rovers operating on Mars. Opportunity has been rolling around the planet since 2004. 2004. It's intended working life was 90 days. It's been keepin' on for 11 cotdamn years. Voyager 1 launched in 1977. It's still sending back data from interstellar space. NASA does all this stuff on a shoestring, paltry paltry budget. Insulting budget. And meanwhile the F-35 still isn't working yet, sucking up taxpayer money like a black hole.
I mean, how many people even see all the images Curiosity is taking? NASA definitely has a marketing problem, that beautiful vistas of Mars go unseen by most of the public. This was taken today.
In case you missed it -Damn, that's a nice pic.