• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Pluto New Horizons |OT| New images. Pluto/Charon still geologically active

Status
Not open for further replies.

DieH@rd

Banned
untitledb0pts.jpg

Amazing.
 

BorkBork

The Legend of BorkBork: BorkBorkity Borking
They are tidally locked so I wouldn't think so. Very strange.

Totally. I always thought Pluto was just a frozen husk of a rock, but the notion of it being so far from the sun and always in the dark, just bubbling away with heat and activity is so cool and unexpected!
 

spekkeh

Banned
The Greek X produces the K sound but is translated to English as chi. The CH makes the same sound as in Christy or Chronos. Not to be confused with the Greek Kappa, but that's a different story.

Interesting, I looked it up, and apparently the Ancient Greek pronounciation would indeed be Karon ([Kh]aron), but the Koine or Modern Greek version would be Charon ([X]aron) (with the ch as in the Scottisch Loch, Dutch/German ach, etc.). But.. what is usual, the ancient or modern greek pronounciation? (and when did the pronounciation change?)
 
Interesting, I looked it up, and apparently the Ancient Greek pronounciation would indeed be Karon ([Kh]aron), but the Koine or Modern Greek version would be Charon ([X]aron) (with the ch as in the Scottisch Loch, Dutch/German ach, etc.). But.. what is usual, the ancient or modern greek pronounciation? (and when did the pronounciation change?)

As someone who learned modern Greek growing up, ancient Greek is really hard to say out loud. At least for someone whose second language is Greek.
 
Well we also say Pare-iss and not Pear-EE, and Bur-lin and not Bear-lin, so I feel comfortable saying Sharon if that's what I am hearing many scientists refer to it as.
 

Mengy

wishes it were bannable to say mean things about Marvel
How do mountains on Pluto form? Especially "youthful" ones. While that term is relative, I would imagine pluto isn't seismically active with a warm interior and moving plates and faults, like earth.

We aren't sure yet, but if I had to make an educated guess, I'd say the geologic activity is most likely due to gravitational forces acting between Charon and Pluto due to their binary orbit. Since the dwarf planets are so "small" even low gravity forces could probably create tectonic activity. Just a guess though. Still, Pluto and Charon are far, FAR more interesting than we imagined.
 

Schrade

Member
pluto-observations-through-the-years.gif

"Views of Pluto Through the Years

This animation combines various observations of Pluto over the course of several decades."
 

Volotaire

Member
Goodness, I've just spent a few hours reading Wikipedia articles about robotic space probes within and outside our Solar System for the past few hours. I do love Space! What a shame that most of the juicy space exploration won't be happening for a few hundred years.
 
Goodness, I've just spent a few hours reading Wikipedia articles about robotic space probes within and outside our Solar System for the past few hours. I do love Space! What a shame that most of the juicy space exploration won't be happening for a few hundred years.

There are so many missions that barely get covered at all in the news that it's easy to miss stuff if you aren't looking for it. I don't think I realized we already have another orbiter on its way to Jupiter until the other day.
 
Awesome pictures!

Also, I asked yesterday in this very thread, why there were so few craters on its surface. Now they say it's very young, possibly <100M yo. This is awesome! Also, Charon looks beautiful. OMG <3
 
Wow, all this activity on Pluto means a higher chance of future missions. They said they will come back if there is warranted scientific reasons to and PLuto being geologically active is more than enough reason!
 
Wow, all this activity on Pluto means a higher chance of future missions. They said they will come back if there is warranted scientific reasons to and PLuto being geologically active is more than enough reason!

It'll be harder to send something there anytime soon, won't it? Both due to Jupiter's position and Pluto moving away from the ecliptic.
 
Wow, all this activity on Pluto means a higher chance of future missions. They said they will come back if there is warranted scientific reasons to and PLuto being geologically active is more than enough reason!

Nah, at that distance I don't really think so. They'll most probably focus on Europa, Titan and Io.
 
This would made the journey significantly longer because half the trip would have been about slowing down enough to be caught by Pluto's gravity well. It already took close to a decade, it would take more than twice as long to actually land.

Plus one of the biggest weight concerns when it comes to launching off Earth is the fuel. Google a random image of a Saturn rocket or the tanks the space shuttles are attached to on launch. The actual space craft is a small fraction. Now considering that they would have to add significantly more fuel for the slow down process and adding more also adds more weight they need to account for with more fuel.

Yes, sending a craft to orbit or land would probably require sending up a rocket to assemble in space, and then re-launching the probe from there. Also, Pluto's on its way out to greater distances from us, and also off the plane of the ecliptic.
 
Would be cool if they reclassified Charon as a Dwarf Planet. Then we would have a binary dwarf planet in our solar system.

They really should. There's more than one proposed definition for a binary planetary system, but the most popular one is that the point of orbit is outside both planets. Pluto and Charon certainly qualify for that (except that they're not planets).
 

elfinke

Member
[/img]http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/pluto-observations-through-the-years.gif[/img]
"Views of Pluto Through the Years

This animation combines various observations of Pluto over the course of several decades."

Awesome, though I wish it were slightly slower.
 

zeshakag

Member
Yes, sending a craft to orbit or land would probably require sending up a rocket to assemble in space, and then re-launching the probe from there. Also, Pluto's on its way out to greater distances from us, and also off the plane of the ecliptic.

A more likely alternative (for now) is just exploiting gravity assists and waiting for a longer trip. New Horizons was launched at a whopping what, 16 km/s? at the beginning of its Earth-Pluto transit. Fastest launch anybody has ever performed. If the Philae operation can be accomplished, so can a Pluto orbital satellite, just on a much longer time scale.

The SLS might aid in orbital reconnaissance of outer bodies in the future, as it packs a ton of delta v, more than the Saturn V.
 
A little off topic. This is from the Rosetta probe:
TUkKuhf.gif


It's cool to see a flightpath visualized like that. I wonder how fast you could move through space just using gravity assists.
 
A little off topic. This is from the Rosetta probe:
TUkKuhf.gif


It's cool to see a flightpath visualized like that. I wonder how fast you could move through space just using gravity assists.

That's insane to plot the route a decade in advance and to be precise enough to do those gravity assists in order to end up at the comet. Really cool stuff.
 

Scrooged

Totally wronger about Nintendo's business decisions.
It's cool to see a flightpath visualized like that. I wonder how fast you could move through space just using gravity assists.

If Star Trek has taught me anything, it's that you can slingshot around a sun so fast you can go back in time.
 

Space Monster

Neo Member
Wow, all this activity on Pluto means a higher chance of future missions. They said they will come back if there is warranted scientific reasons to and PLuto being geologically active is more than enough reason!

For a complete global survey you'll need to wait until around aphelion, which isn't until 2113. So there's no rush.

What's the fastest you could get a probe out there using something like a VASIMR engine? Low thrust, but constantly on for years at a time...
 

cameron

Member

GK86

Homeland Security Fail
NASA: "Charon has a young surface. Its terrain is different than what we imagined. Possibly still has an active surface as well. Here is still great photo of Charon too."

GAF: "Lets debate how to pronounce Charon."
 
LTTP but damn, all that new info and those pictures. Did not expect Pluto to possibly be geologically active or so "young".

They seriously named that black spot on Charon Mordor? Awesome.

I continue to pronounce it Ka-ron. Thanks, Shin Megami Tensei.
 
There are so many missions that barely get covered at all in the news that it's easy to miss stuff if you aren't looking for it. I don't think I realized we already have another orbiter on its way to Jupiter until the other day.

And missions that have a big explosion of news and then people forget about. Like the fact that we still have two rovers operating on Mars. Opportunity has been rolling around the planet since 2004. 2004. It's intended working life was 90 days. It's been keepin' on for 11 cotdamn years. Voyager 1 launched in 1977. It's still sending back data from interstellar space. NASA does all this stuff on a shoestring, paltry paltry budget. Insulting budget. And meanwhile the F-35 still isn't working yet, sucking up taxpayer money like a black hole.

I mean, how many people even see all the images Curiosity is taking? NASA definitely has a marketing problem, that beautiful vistas of Mars go unseen by most of the public. This was taken today.
 
And missions that have a big explosion of news and then people forget about. Like the fact that we still have two rovers operating on Mars. Opportunity has been rolling around the planet since 2004. 2004. It's intended working life was 90 days. It's been keepin' on for 11 cotdamn years. Voyager 1 launched in 1977. It's still sending back data from interstellar space. NASA does all this stuff on a shoestring, paltry paltry budget. Insulting budget. And meanwhile the F-35 still isn't working yet, sucking up taxpayer money like a black hole.

I mean, how many people even see all the images Curiosity is taking? NASA definitely has a marketing problem, that beautiful vistas of Mars go unseen by most of the public. This was taken today.

Damn, that's a nice pic.
 

xenist

Member
I hate seeing a name as cool as Charon being pronounced like it belongs to some soccer mom.

Being Greek I have to pull rank on this. its Kha-ron not Sha-ron.
 

fanboi

Banned
And missions that have a big explosion of news and then people forget about. Like the fact that we still have two rovers operating on Mars. Opportunity has been rolling around the planet since 2004. 2004. It's intended working life was 90 days. It's been keepin' on for 11 cotdamn years. Voyager 1 launched in 1977. It's still sending back data from interstellar space. NASA does all this stuff on a shoestring, paltry paltry budget. Insulting budget. And meanwhile the F-35 still isn't working yet, sucking up taxpayer money like a black hole.

I mean, how many people even see all the images Curiosity is taking? NASA definitely has a marketing problem, that beautiful vistas of Mars go unseen by most of the public. This was taken today.

spirit.png
 

Skeletron

Member
What website should I be looking at to keep track of the most recent high resolution space photographs from the rovers and probes and stuff out there?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom