I feel that Nintendo should add DLC cosmetics to XY. They could make quite a lot of money off dumb fat Redditors from downloadable $5 fedoras.
I know, I know.That's against Nintendo's DLC policies
Get familiar with the type chart:So I started a new Pokémon White save to hype me up for X/Y. I decided to go for Pokémon types I never use usually. Could someone help explain the type advantages and disadvantages between the Ghost, Dark, and Psychic types? They all seem so similar that I'm always forgetting. Any easy tips to help remember would be wonderful.
Due to this new play through, I have a newfound love for Escavelier. My new favorite.
Free to Play with paid accessories?I feel that Nintendo should add DLC cosmetics to XY. They could make quite a lot of money off dumb fat Redditors from downloadable $5 fedoras.
It's like your multiplication tables. You just learn it growing up. You just do.Get familiar with the type chart:
http://pokemondb.net/type
...then when XY comes out get familiar with it again!
I feel that Nintendo should add DLC cosmetics to XY. They could make quite a lot of money off dumb fat Redditors from downloadable $5 fedoras.
Making sense of that chart made my head hurt trying to remember it all. I'm definitely going to forget it all in an hour.Get familiar with the type chart:
http://pokemondb.net/type
...then when XY comes out get familiar with it again!
Nah, man, that's Dotamon. Fucked if I know how you'd do hats and stuff for Pokémon though.Free to Play with paid accessories?
I'm in.
I will take this post as a joke.I feel that Nintendo should add DLC cosmetics to XY. They could make quite a lot of money off dumb fat Redditors from downloadable $5 fedoras.
So you should. $5 cosmetics on a $70 AUD video game would be disgusting.I will take this post as a joke.
Somehow fans want nintendo to be the bad guy.
Could you please explain to me how lowering the cost of entry to $0 and charging for purely cosmetic items that have 0 effect on gameplay is being a "bad guy"? I would really love to hear this. Hell even if it wasn't $0 how is it being a "bad guy"?Somehow fans want nintendo to be the bad guy.
Could you please explain to me how lowering the cost of entry to $0 and charging for purely cosmetic items that have 0 effect on gameplay is being a "bad guy"? I would really love to hear this. Hell even if it wasn't $0 how is it being a "bad guy"?
Psychic is Super-effective against Poison and Fighting, not very effective against Psychic and Steel, and does nothing to Dark.So I started a new Pokémon White save to hype me up for X/Y. I decided to go for Pokémon types I never use usually. Could someone help explain the type advantages and disadvantages between the Ghost, Dark, and Psychic types? They all seem so similar that I'm always forgetting. Any easy tips to help remember would be wonderful.
Wait, there was an outrage for PokeMiles?
That Fennekin plushie shall be mine!
You know what would be nice in X/Y? If seasons are back and there are seasonal clothes you can get! :3
What's wrong with Hilbert?
And Nate isn't too bad without his weird tights/ capris and goofy visor.
What if one wants the "purely cosmetic" items for free? Why should one pay more for content that could perfectly have been put in the games to begin with?
Yeah, if they charge for any DLC, they are "the bad guys".
Stumbled across these on a spanish Pokemon facebook page.
big ass spoiler pics
Pretty neat if they're legit. If they're not, I still like the look of that evo hah.
Stumbled across these on a spanish Pokemon facebook page.
Pretty neat if they're legit. If they're not, I still like the look of that evo hah.
Stumbled across these on a spanish Pokemon facebook page.
EDIT: Woah dang..wasn't expecting people to be upset with spoilers. Linked instead:
Pretty neat if they're legit. If they're not, I still like the look of that evo hah.
There's a spoilers thread over at the discussion forums for you to discuss these. They're not going to be very welcome here, FYI.
Could you please explain to me how lowering the cost of entry to $0 and charging for purely cosmetic items that have 0 effect on gameplay is being a "bad guy"? I would really love to hear this. Hell even if it wasn't $0 how is it being a "bad guy"?
Santa outfit for the girls? GOAT.Late reply, 'cuz I went to bed early last night, but that froakie won shall be all mine. >
I agree with that, by the way. Seasonal outfits would be adorable. Like.. a santa outfit for the female character, and maybe an elf for the male during winter. Lmao
Wait, where did you get "0$" from? As in, giving the game out for free and charging for ... hats?
Anyway, on to how this makes for crappy anti-player relations!
1. It's horse armor at best. It's cosmetic, useless and over priced for a game that's not a friggin MMO. Cosmetics are not a focal point in this, not a true GamePlay goal. That's because it's not a MMO where a player's end game "look" could very well be a goal for most players because they interact with tons of other players in a massive world and want their character's to stand out. For Pokemon at best a nice few people are gonna see your character.
2. Demographics. Nintendo and GF know we play this game ... but that doesn't change the fact that it's a game geared towards children. So yeah, do you support them charging kids money ontop of $40 just to get a cool hat or some other cosmetic items? How are parents gonna look at this? What will mom think when lil Jimmy Two Shoes comes asking her over and over for money because "Nintendo says I have to give them $5 if I want to look like the Original Ash in my game"? Or any other paid DLC for that matter? Plus, neither GF nor Nintendo are hurting for money to the point where they gotta do MMO money dogging on their YOUNG players.
3. GF has and will for the foreseeable future ALWAYS be working on Pokemon titles. Their set up works well ... so that they can do this without the MMO tag line of "We-well, we need Money to keep pumping out content!". Unless it's a huge undertaking like PokeBank it shouldn't cost the player anything extra ...and even PokeBank is super duper cheap with it's 5$ a year price tag.
So yeah, if Nintendo and GF start pushing horse armor onto lil kids when they are perfectly able to make these useless cosmetics free then yeah ... they're doing "bad guy" stuff.
Ah, i didn't even realize we had different threads. My bad guys.
People say the XL stretches the picture. Personally I'm alright with what I get on my XL but if you're a stickler for image quality, I say regular 3DS.This may be a silly question but I am buying a 3DS specifically for X & Y and was wondering whether a 3DS or 3DS XL would be best for it.
I ask because I want the image to be as smooth as possible in terms of aliasing, I just want to get the best models without any jaggies.
This may be a silly question but I am buying a 3DS specifically for X & Y and was wondering whether a 3DS or 3DS XL would be best for it.
I ask because I want the image to be as smooth as possible in terms of aliasing, I just want to get the best models without any jaggies.
People say the XL stretches the picture. Personally I'm alright with what I get on my XL but if you're a stickler for image quality, I say regular 3DS.
This may be a silly question but I am buying a 3DS specifically for X & Y and was wondering whether a 3DS or 3DS XL would be best for it.
I ask because I want the image to be as smooth as possible in terms of aliasing, I just want to get the best models without any jaggies.
Purely cosmetic dlc is fine. I don't see the issue. You don't HAVE to buy it. It doesn't make them bad guys to do it.