PhoenixDark said:Owned by everyone.
Fixed. Perry could take Michelle out on a date and Obama would let them borrow his car at this point.
PhoenixDark said:Owned by everyone.
TacticalFox88 said:IF you would've told me back in 09 Obama would be like this I would've laughed in your face....but damn. Ugh. We need a real progressive in the White House. FUCK.
Friend --
Today I asked for a joint session of Congress where I will lay out a clear plan to get Americans back to work. Next week, I will deliver the details of the plan and call on lawmakers to pass it.
Whether they will do the job they were elected to do is ultimately up to them.
But both you and I can pressure them to do the right thing. We can send the message that the American people are playing by the rules and meeting their responsibilities -- and it's time for our leaders in Congress to meet theirs.
And we must hold them accountable if they don't.
So I'm asking you to stand with me in calling on Congress to step up and take action on jobs:
http://my.barackobama.com/Time-To-Act
No matter how things go in the weeks and months ahead, this will be an important challenge for our organization.
It's been a long time since Congress was focused on what the American people need them to be focused on.
I know that you're frustrated by that. I am, too.
That's why I'm putting forward a set of bipartisan proposals to help grow the economy and create jobs -- that means strengthening our small businesses, giving needed breaks to middle-class families, while taking responsible steps to bring down our deficit.
I'm asking lawmakers to look past short-term politics and take action on that plan. But we've got to do this together.
I will deliver this message to Congress next week, but I'm asking you to stand alongside me today:
http://my.barackobama.com/Time-To-Act
More to come,
Barack
Measley said:You're never going to get a real progressive in the white house. They think Obama's a socialist for Christ's sake.
Tamanon said:GAF picks the weirdest things to freak out about.
Clevinger said:And in the 40s and 50s no one thought you'd ever get a real conservative in the White House. Things change, even it if will take time.
mckmas8808 said:We don't live in a normal world it seems. Everything is a fight and everything needs to be picked apart.
I lose faith in this country more and more with every passing month. Now Obama will give the speech before one of the most highly ranked football games of the year and liberals will be extra pissed off, because Beohner wanted to it moved 24 hours.
*sigh*
Measley said:What? 40 or 50 years? When even progressives are afraid to call themselves liberals, and the left is looked at as one step away from communism, you're not going to get a "real" progressive president for a very long time. Again, the general public thinks that Obama is far left when in fact he's center right.
Karma Kramer said:We certainly don't live in a normal world... a world where individuals put blind faith in someone because of their party... *cough*
To complain that liberals are pissed off too much, is to say dissent is unpatriotic. Our attitude should always be aggressive when it comes to policy and strategy. It isn't about showing love to the side you like more, its about molding your side to your beliefs. Democracy.
mckmas8808 said:I'm not saying liberals are pissed off too much. Dissent all you want. Fuck if I care. I agree mold your side to your beliefs. That's how it's done.
But moving the speech to Thursday is something stupid to be mad about. We just learned about it like 12 hours ago and now it's changed. Big deal. Shouldn't we care more about the details and amount of spending in the speech?
Anybody thinking that the speech won't get a high rating it crazy if the White House can work out a way to get it on TV before the NFL game. I care more about the details. Guys like you should want to shape those and not what day it's seen on TV.
mckmas8808 said:If you got a progressive in the WH, many of the left would think he's not progressive enough. And then when their stuff doesn't pass do to a Congress that's not as left as that progressive President, they'll blame him/her instead of the further to the right Congress.
They can't help themselves.
Karma Kramer said:These two posts contradict each other. Unless you think Obama's lack of progressive defense is beneficial and leads to progressive policy? I don't see much evidence to back this up though.
Frank the Great said:seriously. there is no substantial progressive political movement in this country. the reason obama is a center-right president is because the electorate is center-right. it is not rocket science. if you want a progressive president, a strong progressive movement needs to be built up.
it shouldn't really even be that hard, theoretically. polls show that most americans do tend to fall on the progressive side of many issues (like the infamous public option.) the problem is that these people don't vote. the ideas are out there, people just need to get involved and start voting. as long as the majority of the electorate is elderly white people, politicians will have to cater to them.
Cubsfan23 said:how will republicans be able to attack Obama in 2012 if he has went their way almost all the time?
Karma Kramer said:It is very difficult to get a progressive movement when the media is owned by 5 corporations. Tea Party gets all the coverage, but massive protests from the left barely get a blip.
Clevinger said:What massive progressive protests?
speculawyer said:Why is this high school squabble relevant?
Frank the Great said:seriously. there is no substantial progressive political movement in this country. the reason obama is a center-right president is because the electorate is center-right. it is not rocket science. if you want a progressive president, a strong progressive movement needs to be built up.
it shouldn't really even be that hard, theoretically. polls show that most americans do tend to fall on the progressive side of many issues (like the infamous public option.) the problem is that these people don't vote. the ideas are out there, people just need to get involved and start voting. as long as the majority of the electorate is elderly white people, politicians will have to cater to them.
that being said, my problem with obama on a personal level is that he is an incompetent leader and makes very poor political choices. i do not resent him for being too conservative; as outlined above, he isn't at fault for this. guy needs to get re-elected. but ffs, grow some balls man, stop being bitched around by your opponents.
PhoenixDark said:Owned by a pre-season NFL game. lol
Seriously, who the fuck cares what day the speech is or that Obama moved it. This is the epitome of making a mountain out of a molehill.speculawyer said:Why is this high school squabble relevant?
It's not an issue of huge significance, to be sure, but it is another point of evidence for people who see Obama as an incompetent tactician/negotiator. If he had wanted to poke the Republicans in the eye by upstaging their debate, he could have done so. Instead, you have a situation where his intent to upstage is made known, but he does actually succeed in executing it because the Republicans simply hold the line. A "high school squabble" is an apt way to describe this, but if you're going to pick such a fight, you should (given the amount of leverage he could have brought to bear) be able to win it.speculawyer said:Why is this high school squabble relevant?
Measley said:Interestingly, the right says that Obama is a dictator who refuses to compromise and rams through legislation that ruins the country. Meanwhile, the left says that Obama is a weakling who gives the Republicans everything they want and compromises on everything.
As always, the truth lies somewhere in the middle....
Throw in LeBron in the 4th quarter and you got yourself a bumper sticker.Puddles said:Obama is like air, the national debt, and the San Francisco 49ers: he's owned by everybody.
Lebron is titleless though.LovingSteam said:Throw in LeBron in the 4th quarter and you got yourself a bumper sticker.
Way to ruin it!!!TacticalFox88 said:Lebron is titleless though.
Puddles said:GREAT article debunking the myth that Jimmy Carter taxed and regulated the economy to death and Reagan unshackled it:
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-carterreagan.htm
Recommended reading for everyone in this thread. I'll be using this in a few debates, I'm sure.
That made me laugh. Funny because it's more than likely true.Hokuten said:Story: Obama admin sends a letter to Congress asking to make a speech on Sept. 7. The Speaker of the House says okay but can we wait a day, bro? Sure thing, says the President.
Media Filtered Story: "Today President Obama has fired a shot across the bow of the GOP, demanding time for a speech on major new jobs initiatives. Republican John Boehner has returned fire, and called for a MASSIVE 24-hour delay. Is Speaker Boehner challenging the Constitution itself, and is the President risking his very election on this speech? So far neither Obama nor Boehner will back down, and continue to be fighting a political battle that may change the fate of the entire nation. Who will cave, and who will devour their opponent's still-beating heart? Stay tuned to this thrilling political theater.............BREAKING NEWS: Barack Obama surrenders Presidency to John Boehner. Sasha and Malia to be offered as hostages. Bo Obama to be delivered to Michelle Bachmann, completing her Portuguese Water Dog fur coat."
Snaku said:Fixed. Perry could take Michelle out on a date and Obama would let them borrow his car at this point.
Kenneth Melson, the now former acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives at the center of the Operation Fast and Furious scandal, appears to be getting the treatment now. Attorney General Eric Holder announced Tuesday that Melson has a new job as a "senior adviser" in the Justice Department's Office of Legal.
ToxicAdam said:Austin woman gets 30 years for smuggling guns to Mexican gangs.
In Washington? You get a new job.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opini...peration-fast-and-furious-probe#ixzz1WiGMyRhz
gcubed said:well, now he is particularly acquainted with what is legal and illegal, so he is a great adviser.
Is this the Frank Abagnale Jr. argument?eznark said:In order to catch tax cheats and gun smugglers, you gotta think like tax cheats and gun smugglers.
Hokuten said:Story: Obama admin sends a letter to Congress asking to make a speech on Sept. 7. The Speaker of the House says okay but can we wait a day, bro? Sure thing, says the President.
Media Filtered Story: "Today President Obama has fired a shot across the bow of the GOP, demanding time for a speech on major new jobs initiatives. Republican John Boehner has returned fire, and called for a MASSIVE 24-hour delay. Is Speaker Boehner challenging the Constitution itself, and is the President risking his very election on this speech? So far neither Obama nor Boehner will back down, and continue to be fighting a political battle that may change the fate of the entire nation. Who will cave, and who will devour their opponent's still-beating heart? Stay tuned to this thrilling political theater.............BREAKING NEWS: Barack Obama surrenders Presidency to John Boehner. Sasha and Malia to be offered as hostages. Bo Obama to be delivered to Michelle Bachmann, completing her Portuguese Water Dog fur coat."
Or C: He doesn't care about the debate since he has a country to run and the election isn't for another 14 months.worldrunover said:That's a funny post. But here's my problem: Let's go on the premise that Obama knew there was a debate Wednesday. Let's just go out on a limb and say that someone told him about it. So he purposely chose that date and time, for what reason? If he wanted to stick it to the GOP, then he should stick it to the GOP and stick hard to the date and make Congress oblige. He's the PRESIDENT for Christ's sake. Instead he acquiesced and is made to look like he is either A) disorganized for not knowing about the debate or B) wanting to pick a fight until Boehner slaps him in the mouth, causing him to give in.
I don't see either scenario being particularly flattering.
http://www.hamiltonplacestrategies.com/in-the-news/articles/when-going-negative-isnt-enough/The benchmark of job creation for the President to gain some momentum has been getting tougher as well. To get below 8% by Election Day would require 272,000 jobs per month going forward. This is up again since last month. To reach a more modest 8.5 percent unemployment rate by Election Day 2012 would require the creation of 220,000 jobs on a monthly basis.
We outlined previously that in a tough economic environment, the likely strategy for the Presidents reelection campaign is to define his eventual opponent as unacceptable and frame the election as a choice. Despite continued and recent references to Reagans success in 1984 with 7.2 percent unemployment, we are not going to see a Morning in America campaign, because voters wont believe it in current conditions. This is going to be a traditional negative campaign, the beginnings of which we have already seen, both in a strategy of blaming a do-nothing Congress and in the early framing of likely general election opponents.
The interesting thing is that the economic forecast has now become bad enough that even a negative strategy may be ineffective. In 2008, Ben Smith wrote up an item from a GOP consultant. The source detailed how a focus group he conducted believed every negative thing they heard about then-Senator Obama, and that they were going to vote for him anyway.
The danger for Obama 2012 now is the same as their advantage in 2008. By Election Day 2012 if the economy has been bad for all four years of the Obama presidency, voters may not care what he has to say about his opponent. Or worse, theyll believe it all and vote the President out anyway.
GaimeGuy said:Or C: He doesn't care about the debate since he has a country to run and the election isn't for another 14 months.
GaimeGuy said:Or C: He doesn't care about the debate since he has a country to run and the election isn't for another 14 months.
eznark said:500 Michigan bar and restaurant owners to ban state lawmakers from premises.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT08ka1Nve4
Fucking awesome.