PoliGAF 2012 Community Thread |OT2| This thread title is now under military control

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is that the best counter-argument you can provide?

You know what's great about RCP? They have all of their aggregates!

July 15, 2004:

Kerry: 47%
Bush: 44.6%

Kerry was up all the way until late August.

Tell me, who was the incumbent again? Oh wait
So if Bush was down about 2.5 points, and won by 3, we can safely assume a 5.5 point swing in favor of the incumbent, so it looks like Obama really has an 8 point lead. Aww yeah, making it rain benjamins in the EC.
 

PantherLotus

Professional Schmuck
Just remember to take 2% off all polling for Obama.

faces-romney.jpg
 

Diablos

Member
The only thing I'll agree with PD on is that Obama was able to more easily break past 50% because a. anti-Bush/anti-GOP fever swept the nation and b. Sarah Palin scared the everlovin' shit out of swing voters. Those were two huge things that ended up really helping Obama.

He is going to have to fight like hell this time around to get the same result. I agree with you more than PD on the issue in terms of polling and such, but let's not act like it's going to come as easily this time around. The economy still blows and he's the sitting President. That's just the reality of the situation.

I think the "Firms" ad is a clear indication as to what they are prepared to do as the campaign heads into the fall. And I'm glad he is starting to be a bit more aggressive. He needs to keep it up. I hate US politics, but he's already at a disadvantage thanks to SuperPACs, so he has no choice but to go into this thing swinging.

One thing I've noticed is that the ground game for Obama doesn't seem to be as energized this time around. If I didn't work 50 hours a week I'd try to find more time to do my part here in PA. The campaign needs to start encouraging a strong GOTV effort and educating Pennsylvanians about the new voter ID law and what they may have to do in order to not get turned away on the 7th of November.

I volunteered a little in 2008, but I've gotta say, there are a lot of tea partiers in western PA the further away you get from Pittsburgh. I won't lie when I say these people tend to scare me a bit. You really do have to wonder about the safety of volunteers going door to door... if these people happily bring their firearms to rallies across the nation, just imagine what could happen this time around if a volunteer knocks on one of their doors. These people are foaming-at-the-mouth mad at Obama and anyone who supports him.
 
Why, yes... Yes I can! I think that whole argument up there is horseshit. There is no good reason for working people to agree with policies that put them out of work for some greater global good. Outsourcing may well be good business practice for people like Romney but for the rest of us, its nothing but stress and hardship. Romney knows it too, thats why he's eager to run away from it.

Whats more, the job of POTUS is to look after the interests of all US citizens, We're supposed to elect a guy that got paid for putting people out of work? Normally, we rarely ever see or know who these guys are, but here is one and he wants to be President. Screw him and sorry if thats unfair to his feelings or his business philosophy.
Exactly. The argument of letting 3rd world develop through outsourcing reeks of naivete and at worst condescending. 3rd world countries need to learn about self sustaining economies. Isnt that what conservatives love, not relying on others? Outsourcing may not be unethical, but its definitely not in favor of America or its citizens.
 

Loudninja

Member
Romney Goes After Obama On Political Payoffs, Fast and Furious
Mitt Romney deflected a question about releasing his tax returns in an interview on “Fox & Friends” Monday morning by mentioning President Obama’s use of executive privilege to keep documents in the ATF’s Fast and Furious scandal and pinning the idea of a lack of transparency on Obama.

Romney also attacked Obama for giving directing government money to his political donors – a theme that has surfaced in recent ads and in a web video out Monday morning. “I think it’s wrong,” Romney said. “I think it stinks to high heaven.”
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/romney-goes-after-obama-on-political-payoffs-fast

They are getting very desperate now.
 

Mario

Sidhe / PikPok
They also released how awesome Romney's death sentence idea in MA was. Yes ... his death sentence idea.

Just had to Google this.

Curious how religious conservatives can be motivated to cite "the power of science" when it comes to helping kill people, but brush it off when it comes to things like climate change, evolution etc.
 
Faux outrage over what? I think it's pretty sad – but maybe not angry sad – that the US Olympic team doesn't have uniforms that were made in the USA.
 

Tim-E

Member
Faux outrage over what? I think it's pretty sad that the US Olympic team doesn't have uniforms that were made in the USA.

Why are you showing such faux outrage on this issue when you could be focusing your attention on our 34th effort to repeal Obamacare!!!!
 

Kosmo

Banned
Why are you showing such faux outrage on this issue when you could be focusing your attention on our 34th effort to repeal Obamacare!!!!

So you consider John Dingell introducing universal healthcare in the House for 53 years in a row, what, exactly?
 
Isn't a congressman suppose to lobby and push for his state's best interests? Seems a senator of New York pushing to have New York make something for the Olympics is just the sort of thing I'd want a representative to do.
 

Tim-E

Member
RUBIO MEANS BROWNS WILL VOTE FOR ROMNEY SO PLEASE PICK HIM

It's either going to be Portman or Pawlenty. They are going to go for the exact opposite of the 2008 GOP pick this time. I could also definitely see them announcing it this week in an effort to quiet this Bain talk a bit.
 

Tim-E

Member
I thought Condi Rice would be an overwhelming favorite. Not Tea Party enough I guess.

Her being pro-choice would be a deal breaker for a huge number of conservatives. Some people are so passionate about that stance that they would likely stay home, despite how much they hate Obama. Romney not being well-liked by conservatives already would only amplify the problem.
 
Is that the best counter-argument you can provide?

You know what's great about RCP? They have all of their aggregates!

July 15, 2004:

Kerry: 47%
Bush: 44.6%

Kerry was up all the way until late August.

Tell me, who was the incumbent again? Oh wait

Voters came home to the incumbent during a war, that's not surprising. 2004 was quite a different election from most that include an incumbent. I think I'd agree 2012 is as well in many ways but we don't know to what extent. Still the 50% marker is important and Obama isnt there yet. Romney is going to rebound eventually, it always happens.

But that new Romney ad is pathetic....that's what they came did with their backs against the wall?
 
Her being pro-choice would be a deal breaker for a huge number of conservatives. Some people are so passionate about that stance that they would likely stay home, despite how much they hate Obama. Romney not being well-liked by conservatives already would only amplify the problem.

I thought the McCain campaign was a clusterfuck, but holy shit at Romney's campaign chaos.
How is he supposed to convince people he can run anything?
 
RUBIO MEANS BROWNS WILL VOTE FOR ROMNEY SO PLEASE PICK HIM

It's either going to be Portman or Pawlenty. They are going to go for the exact opposite of the 2008 GOP pick this time. I could also definitely see them announcing it this week in an effort to quiet this Bain talk a bit.

I can see portman, but I'm struggling to see any benefit pawlenty brings to the table
 

Tim-E

Member
I can see portman, but I'm struggling to see any benefit pawlenty brings to the table

Neither one of them really bring anything, which I think is the point. They are completely safe and the Romney camp just hopes they drum up no attention on their own.

Portman brings Bush-era liability. Rubio probably doesn't want the gig. Pawlenty might be all he has left.

Yeah, Rubio has a pretty strong career ahead of him in this party and he likely knows that jumping onto this sinking ship would only hurt him going forward.

Pawlenty really isn't doing much of anything, so he probably would take it.
 

RDreamer

Member

Wow... what a horrible ad. I couldn't help but smile the whole freaking time. That clip just does that to me. It's just a nice, humanizing, charismatic display, and it shows through in the ad, since you can still hear the cheers of the crowd. Showing his shit-eating grin at the end was also a mistake, I think. Really, just a terrible ad for trying to hit Obama back... It's like they were just thinking "Oh, we need to copy that ad... quick, find Obama singing. I know there was that one clip! Use that!"
 
No idea, nor do I know why Democrats never brought it up (I assume) in the 41 of those 53 years when they controlled the house.
Okay, so you admit you have no idea, and in turn, somewhat admitting that your original assertion was not comparable to what Tim-E posted. Then you move your goalposts.

Your original post:
Kosmo said:
So you consider John Dingell introducing universal healthcare in the House for 53 years in a row, what, exactly?
In this post, you attack Democratic Congressman John Dingell for introducing universal health care legislation "53 years in a row," implying he's wasting the people's time and money. In doing so, comparing it to the whole House voting on universal health care legislation or repealing such legislation (as a response to Tim-E's post).

No idea, nor do I know why Democrats never brought it up (I assume) in the 41 of those 53 years when they controlled the house.
In this post, you attack the Democrats for not voting on the legislation as a whole House! You just attacked a Democratic congressman for introducing it too many times! You responded to a post saying it's a waste of time to bring up legislation so many times when it doesn't hope to pass! WHAT ARE YOU DOING

...

Oh, I have a headache.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom