AlteredBeast
Fork 'em, Sparky!
Private hospital, private health care. Wealthy part of town is the typical crowd he services, too...
Private hospital, private health care. Wealthy part of town is the typical crowd he services, too...
So if Bush was down about 2.5 points, and won by 3, we can safely assume a 5.5 point swing in favor of the incumbent, so it looks like Obama really has an 8 point lead. Aww yeah, making it rain benjamins in the EC.Is that the best counter-argument you can provide?
You know what's great about RCP? They have all of their aggregates!
July 15, 2004:
Kerry: 47%
Bush: 44.6%
Kerry was up all the way until late August.
Tell me, who was the incumbent again? Oh wait
Exactly. The argument of letting 3rd world develop through outsourcing reeks of naivete and at worst condescending. 3rd world countries need to learn about self sustaining economies. Isnt that what conservatives love, not relying on others? Outsourcing may not be unethical, but its definitely not in favor of America or its citizens.Why, yes... Yes I can! I think that whole argument up there is horseshit. There is no good reason for working people to agree with policies that put them out of work for some greater global good. Outsourcing may well be good business practice for people like Romney but for the rest of us, its nothing but stress and hardship. Romney knows it too, thats why he's eager to run away from it.
Whats more, the job of POTUS is to look after the interests of all US citizens, We're supposed to elect a guy that got paid for putting people out of work? Normally, we rarely ever see or know who these guys are, but here is one and he wants to be President. Screw him and sorry if thats unfair to his feelings or his business philosophy.
Well Mitt Romney just copy Obama's ad lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIajeW6xPnI&feature=player_embedded#!
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/romney-goes-after-obama-on-political-payoffs-fastMitt Romney deflected a question about releasing his tax returns in an interview on “Fox & Friends” Monday morning by mentioning President Obama’s use of executive privilege to keep documents in the ATF’s Fast and Furious scandal and pinning the idea of a lack of transparency on Obama.
Romney also attacked Obama for giving directing government money to his political donors – a theme that has surfaced in recent ads and in a web video out Monday morning. “I think it’s wrong,” Romney said. “I think it stinks to high heaven.”
Well Mitt Romney just copy Obama's ad lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIajeW6xPnI&feature=player_embedded#!
Romney Goes After Obama On Political Payoffs, Fast and Furious
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/romney-goes-after-obama-on-political-payoffs-fast
They getting very desperate now.
I fully expect theRomney's defense for a lack of transparency on taxes is "Well, Obama does it too!"?
Wow.
After an entire week of getting ripped apart, this is what they come up with? Lol
They also released how awesome Romney's death sentence idea in MA was. Yes ... his death sentence idea.
FAUX OUTRAGE!!!!!!!
Why are you making fun of your own post history?
Faux outrage over what? I think it's pretty sad that the US Olympic team doesn't have uniforms that were made in the USA.
Why are you showing such faux outrage on this issue when you could be focusing your attention on our 34th effort to repeal Obamacare!!!!
So you consider John Dingell introducing universal healthcare in the House for 53 years in a row, what, exactly?
So you consider John Dingell introducing universal healthcare in the House for 53 years in a row, what, exactly?
So you consider John Dingell introducing universal healthcare in the House for 53 years in a row, what, exactly?
Looks like it's Pawlenty. A safe pick.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/16/us/politics/pawlenty-looked-at-as-romney-running-mate.html?_r=2
I want an answer, Kosmo.The whole House has voted on universal health care legislation in the last 53 years how many times?
I want an answer, Kosmo.
Well Mitt Romney just copy Obama's ad lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIajeW6xPnI&feature=player_embedded#!
I want an answer, Kosmo.
I thought Condi Rice would be an overwhelming favorite. Not Tea Party enough I guess.
I thought Condi Rice would be an overwhelming favorite. Not Tea Party enough I guess.
Is that the best counter-argument you can provide?
You know what's great about RCP? They have all of their aggregates!
July 15, 2004:
Kerry: 47%
Bush: 44.6%
Kerry was up all the way until late August.
Tell me, who was the incumbent again? Oh wait
Her being pro-choice would be a deal breaker for a huge number of conservatives. Some people are so passionate about that stance that they would likely stay home, despite how much they hate Obama. Romney not being well-liked by conservatives already would only amplify the problem.
RUBIO MEANS BROWNS WILL VOTE FOR ROMNEY SO PLEASE PICK HIM
It's either going to be Portman or Pawlenty. They are going to go for the exact opposite of the 2008 GOP pick this time. I could also definitely see them announcing it this week in an effort to quiet this Bain talk a bit.
I can see portman, but I'm struggling to see any benefit pawlenty brings to the table
I can see portman, but I'm struggling to see any benefit pawlenty brings to the table
Portman brings Bush-era liability. Rubio probably doesn't want the gig. Pawlenty might be all he has left.
Sidenote: I think accidentally comparing yourself to Jon Kerry is a fucking terrible decision.
Jon Kerry, Scott Brown, Mitt Romney - all those Massachusetts blowdried Kennedy-imitating blowhards are essentially the same guy. He can't escape that.
Sidenote: I think accidentally comparing yourself to Jon Kerry is a fucking terrible decision.
Well Mitt Romney just copy Obama's ad lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIajeW6xPnI&feature=player_embedded#!
Romney is naming his vp this week. Reminds me of when McCain named Palin during the period where his ten houses were being discussed 24/7.
Okay, so you admit you have no idea, and in turn, somewhat admitting that your original assertion was not comparable to what Tim-E posted. Then you move your goalposts.No idea, nor do I know why Democrats never brought it up (I assume) in the 41 of those 53 years when they controlled the house.
In this post, you attack Democratic Congressman John Dingell for introducing universal health care legislation "53 years in a row," implying he's wasting the people's time and money. In doing so, comparing it to the whole House voting on universal health care legislation or repealing such legislation (as a response to Tim-E's post).Kosmo said:So you consider John Dingell introducing universal healthcare in the House for 53 years in a row, what, exactly?
In this post, you attack the Democrats for not voting on the legislation as a whole House! You just attacked a Democratic congressman for introducing it too many times! You responded to a post saying it's a waste of time to bring up legislation so many times when it doesn't hope to pass! WHAT ARE YOU DOINGNo idea, nor do I know why Democrats never brought it up (I assume) in the 41 of those 53 years when they controlled the house.