"OBAMAR STOL MY TRUCKNUTZ
thegiantalbion 16 hours ago"
lol
Assuming an Obama victory, there's going to be one hell of a post-election period of introspection for the Republican Party. They're going to have to face-up to these new demographic realities, and we'll get to watch an incredible struggle when the different intra-party factions begin to air their disagreements over how to adjust strategies/policies/etc.Yeah, this is gonna be an ugly election.
They seem to have decided that they only way they can win is with a massive % of the white vote because they can't get minorities. It is probably not going to work. And as the TRMS pointed out, this is probably the last time anyone tries this strategy because the demographics just won't make it a viable option in the future.
Or, they can dig-in, continue their denial ("we weren't conservative enough!"),
They have to come to the realization at some point that they have to govern more than just Republicans.Assuming an Obama victory, there's going to be one hell of a post-election period of introspection for the Republican Party. They're going to have to face-up to these new demographic realities, and we'll get to watch an incredible struggle when the different intra-party factions begin to air their disagreements over how to adjust strategies/policies/etc.
Or, they can dig-in, continue their denial ("we weren't conservative enough!"), and lose some more.
Assuming an Obama victory, there's going to be one hell of a post-election period of introspection for the Republican Party. They're going to have to face-up to these new demographic realities, and we'll get to watch an incredible struggle when the different intra-party factions begin to air their disagreements over how to adjust strategies/policies/etc.
Or, they can dig-in, continue their denial ("we weren't conservative enough!"), and lose some more.
Assuming an Obama victory, there's going to be one hell of a post-election period of introspection for the Republican Party.
People said the same thing in 2008...nothing's changed.
I'm honestly wondering if they'll continue to get crazier. They may very well try.Well, it did. They got crazier.
Assuming an Obama victory, there's going to be one hell of a [Civil war]
Assuming an Obama victory, there's going to be one hell of a post-election period of introspection for the Republican Party. They're going to have to face-up to these new demographic realities, and we'll get to watch an incredible struggle when the different intra-party factions begin to air their disagreements over how to adjust strategies/policies/etc.
Or, they can dig-in, continue their denial ("we weren't conservative enough!"), and lose some more.
If Obama wins but they hold on to the House and gain senate seats (likeliest scenario imo) then there will be no introspection.
I'm honestly wondering if they'll continue to get crazier. They may very well try.
Watching how they accomplish this would be very entertaining.. and a bit scary.
In Hawaii, D'Souza asserts with no evidence, Obama sympathized with native Hawaiians who felt they had been marginalized by the American government when Hawaii was becoming a state. D'Souza also asserts again with no evidence that Obama had been coached to hold those views at Punahou, the prestigious prep school he attended in Honolulu.
The horror.
Assuming an Obama victory, there's going to be one hell of a post-election period of introspection for the Republican Party. They're going to have to face-up to these new demographic realities, and we'll get to watch an incredible struggle when the different intra-party factions begin to air their disagreements over how to adjust strategies/policies/etc.
Or, they can dig-in, continue their denial ("we weren't conservative enough!"), and lose some more.
How un-American.The horror.
So are they admitting defeat then? They thought they could change the game with a conservative circle jerk for a whole entire week a while ago.Romney: Don't expect that 11 point convention bump we talked about 2 weeks back
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns...l-bets-are-off-on-convention-bump-133486.html
And funny Ras now has Obama +2
guy in commercial said:"As a Navy Seal, I fought so that I would never have to see my president bow to anyone."
youtube comment said:You picked a very specific and strange reason to serve in the military...
I wouldn't be surprised if Ras is setting up for next week to have Romney up 5 or something so he can be like "Wow, look at that convention bump guys!" and every other pollster will adjust their model to show Romney leading, because you can't look biased!So are they admitting defeat then? They thought they could change the game with a conservative circle jerk for a whole entire week a while ago.
Yeah, this is gonna be an ugly election.
They seem to have decided that they only way they can win is with a massive % of the white vote because they can't get minorities. It is probably not going to work. And as the TRMS pointed out, this is probably the last time anyone tries this strategy because the demographics just won't make it a viable option in the future.
Did you see the New York Mag article? They're firing up one last time the fear of others in their white base.
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/08/2012-or-never-for-gops-white-base.html
The crowd will be a sea of white tonight. Of course the list of speakers will be like 50% minority, despite their actual demographic being 89% white.
The Camera will focus on the minorities in the crowd. They always like to pretend.
Romney: Don't expect that 11 point convention bump we talked about 2 weeks back
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns...l-bets-are-off-on-convention-bump-133486.html
And funny Ras now has Obama +2
"If the election was held tomorrow we would win and win pretty easily. That's amazing because we've been outspent the way we've been spent," Stuart said.
TAMPA -- Former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour was holding court at a private party before the Republican National Committee Sunday, where he called President Barack Obama "a one percenter," and urged a group of conservative bloggers to rally behind Mitt Romney even though he's "not perfect."
"We've got two guys running for president, by the way, who are both very rich. Each one of them is in the top one percent in the United States." Barbour said during an event for the National Bloggers Club in Tampa. "Both of them are one percenters. And in fairness, both of them made their own money. Romney made his by winning the confidence of people who invested their money. Obama made his money writing two books about himself. He's a one percenter!...Which one do you figure is going to do a better job of getting our economy going in the right direction?"
Indeed, both men are in the "top one percent" of income earners, although Romney's net worth is about 20 times greater than Obama's. Romney and Obama are worth around $200 million and $12million, respectively.
Romney's counting on the coveted Snooki endorsement to win him New Jersey.Now, now, there are plenty of orange faced minorities in crowd that like sun tanning booths, think of the Boehners of the country!
i couldn't live with myself if i had to do that for a living.
Eznark's Lt. Governor, ladies and gentlemen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=t3usq2UGeCI
Republicans, king of the Trolls. Kings of the False equivalencies.
Haley Barbour on Obama: ‘He’s a one percenter’
Yep. Because $12mil = $200mil.
I mean, as a lowly earner of < $21K a year, I'd love to have a tenth of what they earn, and they are both the 1 percent, but who would you want to trust with the way they earned their money: Someone who became president and wrote a book about themselves, or someone who may or may not be hiding their money away to avoid paying taxes on it?
its funny, because getting rich from writing a book is about as free-market, capitalistic American as it gets. You write the book. People buy the book. You make money in direct proportion to the number of people who thought your book was worth reading.Republicans, king of the Trolls. Kings of the False equivalencies.
Haley Barbour on Obama: Hes a one percenter
Yep. Because $12mil = $200mil.
I mean, as a lowly earner of < $21K a year, I'd love to have a tenth of what they earn, and they are both the 1 percent, but who would you want to trust with the way they earned their money: Someone who became president and wrote a book about themselves, or someone who may or may not be hiding their money away to avoid paying taxes on it?
Um, one of them wrote a book about his incredibly interesting life. The other one could have written a book about how rich he got by inheriting wealth, outsourcing jobs and dismantling companies. ANd that estimate of Romney's wealth is on the low end. I guess he could have added a chapter about dressage.
its funny, because getting rich from writing a book is about as free-market, capitalistic American as it gets. You write the book. People buy the book. You make money in direct proportion to the number of people who thought your book was worth reading.
I live in Indiana.
by the time his father died he had more then enough money, he didnt inherit his wealth, he just had a privileged upbringing
god dammit
from Indiana.
He inherited a great education, great connections and network, great community, lots of resources, and I am sure his parents paid for tons of shit. "Just" having a privileged upbringing counts for a whole lot.
why are there so many poligaffers in the great lakes states, anyway? you'd think there'd be more of us in california or texas or (god forbid) florida
My outrage meter must be malfunctioning today, what made this video noteworthy?
libel