Is that really the case, isn';t Washington also going to experience a big increase?
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PoliGAF 2013 |OT2| Worth 77% of OT1
- Thread starter The Librarian
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Is that really the case, isn';t Washington also going to experience a big increase?
el retorno
Member
Is that really the case, isn';t Washington also going to experience a big increase?
I've not heard about that thought a google search reveals its only right wing sites are talking about it and I saw and article by Avik Roy whose had some problems in the past with misrepresenting rate hikes. I don't even think Washington has revealed their exchange prices.
I don't see anything on their website
http://www.wahealthplanfinder.org/
Black Mamba
Member
With the exception of NY, premiums should be going up in every state.
But these numbers are all pre-subsidy. The whole point is that those making about 2-2.5 times the poverty line or less will get insurance at a very discounted rate while everyone else will see a bump up.
It should also be noted that the "average plan" today covers a lot less than the "average plan" in the exchanges. There are no longer junk plans going forward.
But these numbers are all pre-subsidy. The whole point is that those making about 2-2.5 times the poverty line or less will get insurance at a very discounted rate while everyone else will see a bump up.
It should also be noted that the "average plan" today covers a lot less than the "average plan" in the exchanges. There are no longer junk plans going forward.
So if I understand this correctly, Obamacare is making premiums lower in the blue states because those states are fully implementing it. Whereas the red states are blocking as much as they can, therefore the premiums are higher. Is this correct? The red states are creating higher premiums by embracing tea party policies?
Black Mamba
Member
So if I understand this correctly, Obamacare is making premiums lower in the blue states because those states are fully implementing it. Whereas the red states are blocking as much as they can, therefore the premiums are higher. Is this correct? The red states are creating higher premiums by embracing tea party policies?
No, not necessarily.
Red states are, mostly, not expanding medicaid which is screwing people at the poverty line to 138% of the poverty line who would have been eligible for medicaid with the expansion.
The Obamacare exchanges in red states are being set up by the Feds. We don't know how that will play out, yet, in terms of pricing. My guess is it probably will be a bit higher than if the state did it themselves but who knows?
Outside of New York, every state should see an increased prices in premiums. The key has always been subsidies offsetting these costs, regardless of state.
No, not necessarily.
Red states are, mostly, not expanding medicaid which is screwing people at the poverty line to 138% of the poverty line who would have been eligible for medicaid with the expansion.
The Obamacare exchanges in red states are being set up by the Feds. We don't know how that will play out, yet, in terms of pricing. My guess is it probably will be a bit higher than if the state did it themselves but who knows?
Outside of New York, every state should see an increased prices in premiums. The key has always been subsidies offsetting these costs, regardless of state.
Ahh, that makes more sense.
How much though? I have an individual plan in PA, really hoping I don't get screwed over by Corbett and co. being heartless as usualNo, not necessarily.
Red states are, mostly, not expanding medicaid which is screwing people at the poverty line to 138% of the poverty line who would have been eligible for medicaid with the expansion.
The Obamacare exchanges in red states are being set up by the Feds. We don't know how that will play out, yet, in terms of pricing. My guess is it probably will be a bit higher than if the state did it themselves but who knows?
Outside of New York, every state should see an increased prices in premiums. The key has always been subsidies offsetting these costs, regardless of state.
Black Mamba
Member
How much though? I have an individual plan in PA, really hoping I don't get screwed over by Corbett and co. being heartless as usual
No one knows how much premiums go up there until the people in charge announce them.
ASAIK, if the Feds are setting up the exchanges, the state laws don't matter as much. I don't think Corbett has much of an effect at all.
How much they go up is a tough question to answer. The plans aren't an apples to apples comparison in most cases and again, depends on if you get subsidies.
If you buy individual insurance right now, are single and healthy, and earn $40k+, your premiums are going up unless you're in NY. If the same is true but you're earning $22k or below, your premiums should go down a lot after subsidies.
Between it's hard to say.
Dr. Pangloss
Member
You have to realize that most of the health plans in red states right now are shit before moving to Obamacare. The state governments let them do what they want. There is no real bare minimum. Now that Obamacare has some real standards, these plans have to get a complete overhaul that will of course jack up their rates. But all this talk in rate increases leaves out the mention of the subsidies provided by Obamacare.
So yes, the rates are going up because the plans will be decent now. But they won't cost that much to actual consumers because of the subsidies and only like 20% of the population gets their coverage on the individual market. Everyone else is covered by the government (Medicaid or Medicare) or their employer.
So yes, the rates are going up because the plans will be decent now. But they won't cost that much to actual consumers because of the subsidies and only like 20% of the population gets their coverage on the individual market. Everyone else is covered by the government (Medicaid or Medicare) or their employer.
rocketknight
Member
Links from today:
Unsurprising study about immigration motivation:
Red State writer with no health insurance asks for and receives help from the internet:
Conservatives Are Even Unskewing Baseball Numbers Now
A brief take on how gender bias is perpetuated today:
Which links to this long, depressing examination of discrimination and sexism in the Texas legislature:
Republicans Won't Stop Trying to Name Ocean Waters After Ronald Reagan
Texas Republican says Wendy Davis should pay for special session needed to pass GOP abortion bill
Sorry, I know this isn't a great format. But there was just too much crazy stuff today that I wanted to highlight.
Unsurprising study about immigration motivation:
Ryo concluded that perhaps there is very little that immigration enforcement alone might be able to do to affect changes in peoples intentions to migrate illegally. In fact, she surmised that a crackdown on border crossings may actually increase them because migrants may feel unfairly treated and regard U.S. immigration laws with less authority. As she wrote in the study, continuing efforts by the U.S. government to selectively target and marginalize unauthorized Mexican migrants might thus have the unintended consequence of producing lesser, rather than greater, voluntary deference to U.S. immigration law, as increasing numbers of Mexicans come to question the legitimacy of U.S. legal authority.
Red State writer with no health insurance asks for and receives help from the internet:
On Tuesday, a page for Howe was created on the crowd funding website GoFundMe, explaining that his family needs to preserve his health for the benefit of his two daughters. It would lift an incredible burden for Caleb [and his wife] Donna if they could get even the smallest amount of help with these upcoming expenses and with anything extra that comes in, Howes page explains.
Erickson promoted the fund on RedState with a short post entitled, Please Consider Helping Caleb Howes Family. And the left-leaning Daily Kos also picked up the story, encouraging its readers to help, too. Allow me to ask you to do the Christian thing and donate to this young mans fund, DailyKos user SemDem writes. He has two young, beautiful and innocent daughters who need him and that is who the fund is for. He does not deserve to suffer, much less die.
Conservatives Are Even Unskewing Baseball Numbers Now
In this article, columnist John Pudner introduces a new, proprietary metric, called Value Add Baseball. The idea behind it is to evaluate starting pitchers based not on how well they pitch, but how well they pitch in specific game situations. If a starting pitchers team scores six runs, he can give up five runs and still maintain a lead; by contrast, if a starting pitchers team scores only two runs, then he can give up three runs but still fall behind. The point of Value Add Baseball is to adjust for this: To make it clear that the pitcher who allows five runs when his team has scored six has done better than the pitcher who has allowed three runs when his team has scored two.
Sound crazy? It should! The starting pitcher is the one player who has responsibility each game for getting his team the win, Pudner writes. But, actually, it is not the pitchers job to get his team the win. It is the teams job to get the team the win. Baseball is a team sport! The starting pitcher contributes to the wintypically, I agree, more than any other individual player doesby helping, along with his defense and catcher, limit the other teams runs. But this metric holds the pitcher completely responsible. And it subscribes to the myth of pitching to the score, which is just plain wrong.
A brief take on how gender bias is perpetuated today:
All of which is to say, if you draw most of your top economic policymakers from a network that's easily more than 80-percent male*, you may occasionally come up with a woman candidate. But the vast majority of the people you select are going to be men. Or, put differently: The way to refute the boys club charge isnt to point to the one woman who happened to emerge from this network. Its to show that youre reaching outside the network to recruit, something the Burwell pick emphatically doesnt show.
Which links to this long, depressing examination of discrimination and sexism in the Texas legislature:
When I first got here in 1973, a guy called me his black mistress, she told me. The males could not understand why I was offended. He was a state representative. Let me tell you what happened: He didnt come back, he was appointed a district court judge. Thompson says thats a common tale in the Capitol: a male legislator can say something sexist and experience little to no consequences, and, in some cases, be promoted.
...
It was the same session that saw the Legislature cut funding for womens health care and family planning by two-thirds, and pass a bill requiring women to endure a pre-abortion sonogram. It was also the session in which Tuffy Hamilton, during a debate about Franklin Mountains State Park, made a boob joke to Marisa Marquez. (Young lady, would you please tell us why your mountains are better than any of our mountains, and are they man-made or are they real mountains?)
...
In April, Zaffirini brought a proposal to the floor. The Senate was discussing an omnibus bill on the Texas Preservation Board, and she wanted to allow lactation suites in the Capitol, where women could breast feed or pump. Amarillo Republican Kel Seliger introduced a farcical amendment to make those lactation suites part of Zaffirinis office. Its not funny. Its not funny. Its not funny, Zaffirini muttered to herself.
...
During a floor debate in Davis first session, Sen. Troy Fraser, a Republican from Horseshoe Bay, infamously told Davis that he couldnt understand what she was saying because he cant hear womens voices.
Republicans Won't Stop Trying to Name Ocean Waters After Ronald Reagan
The panel is weighing Rep. Darrell Issa's (R-Calif.) bill that would rename the country's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), which generally extends from 3 miles to 200 miles offshore, as the Ronald Wilson Reagan Exclusive Economic Zone.
"While certain left-wing organizations have characterized this legislation as trivial, there is no debate our 40th president served with the highest distinction," said Rep. John Fleming (R-La.), speaking in favor of the bill that honors Reagan's 1983 designation of the EEZ.
Texas Republican says Wendy Davis should pay for special session needed to pass GOP abortion bill
I am upset at the cost, Capriglione said. I think we need to remember why we are having this extra special session. One state senator, in an effort to capture national attention, forced this special session. I firmly believe that Sen. Wendy Davis should reimburse the taxpayers for the entire cost of the second special session. I am sure that she has raised enough money at her Washington, D.C., fundraiser to cover the cost.
Sorry, I know this isn't a great format. But there was just too much crazy stuff today that I wanted to highlight.
Avon Barksdale
Member
The Daily Show's segment on the minimum wage protests was incredible. And Fox's commentary on it was absolutely fucking shameful. Wow.
Tracy Byrnes' hypocrisy was something else.
adamsappel
Member
I know I'm responding to an older comment, but Josef Stalin is responsible for the deaths of at least 20 million people (maybe as many as 60 million), sent millions to gulags, some for "crimes" such as being late for work or making jokes, people in the Soviet Union lived in fear of arrest and execution every moment. His crimes against humanity are legion. I'm not a fan of the NSA, etc., but it's actually pretty unconscionable to compare Obama to him.
NYCmetsfan
Banned
I know I'm responding to an older comment, but Josef Stalin is responsible for the deaths of at least 20 million people (maybe as many as 60 million), sent millions to gulags, some for "crimes" such as being late for work or making jokes, people in the Soviet Union lived in fear of arrest and execution every moment. His crimes against humanity are legion. I'm not a fan of the NSA, etc., but it's actually pretty unconscionable to compare Obama to him.
People know this. Its why they do it. It gives their political opinions weight. Its the same reason why people curse a lot of time. It shocks people into paying attention.
People also love analogies and it makes the thought process easier. Just make it fit into the larger historical pattern and you don't need to explain the specific reasons why certain things happen.
Maybe I missed some comments, but I mostly see people comparing the level of spying we currently have in the US vs. what the USSR under Stalin had.I know I'm responding to an older comment, but Josef Stalin is responsible for the deaths of at least 20 million people (maybe as many as 60 million), sent millions to gulags, some for "crimes" such as being late for work or making jokes, people in the Soviet Union lived in fear of arrest and execution every moment. His crimes against humanity are legion. I'm not a fan of the NSA, etc., but it's actually pretty unconscionable to compare Obama to him.
I'm pretty sure no one here said Obama is just as bad as Stalin.
Also, historical comparisons are never unconscionable, at most they're inaccurate or useless.
Also (2) Angry Fork is 100% right that Stalin (or Hoover for that matter) would've creamed his pants over our surveillance apparatus and it's also true that it's more thorough and capable than anything such system in the history of the world.
p.s.
It's always one person mentioning Stalin and a billion people quoting him about how horrible it is to compare to Stalin. Remember the golden rule of the internet, if something is bothering you and you want it to stop, your best course of action is to ignore it.
zero shift
Banned
So I talked to my coworker today and he was commenting how slow business was. He said, "Yeah it stinks because while the the economy is in the tubes". I then said, "Its too bad because while America as whole has their economy gaining Wisconsin is almost dead last in economic growth." He then went on about how the economy is upping great now and that we are now 5th in the best economies in the nation and that the papers don't report it because they only report bad news.
God damn does Walker have this state under a spell.
No.
God damn does Walker have this state under a spell.
Josef Stalin is responsible for the deaths of at least 20 million people (maybe as many as 60 million).
No.
PhoenixDark
Banned
I just hope people don't look at the prices being revealed now, deem them too high, and dismiss buying insurance without realizing subsidies will be available. The misinformation campaign is crazy right now, and the administration hasn't done a good job combatting it.You have to realize that most of the health plans in red states right now are shit before moving to Obamacare. The state governments let them do what they want. There is no real bare minimum. Now that Obamacare has some real standards, these plans have to get a complete overhaul that will of course jack up their rates. But all this talk in rate increases leaves out the mention of the subsidies provided by Obamacare.
So yes, the rates are going up because the plans will be decent now. But they won't cost that much to actual consumers because of the subsidies and only like 20% of the population gets their coverage on the individual market. Everyone else is covered by the government (Medicaid or Medicare) or their employer.
The Librarian
Banned
UE dropped from 7.6% to 7.4%.
- July added 162k
- May revised downward from 195k to 176k; June revised downward from 195k to 188k
- Government added jobs this month: 1k
Also, read this op-ed by former EPA administrators under Republicans presidents telling Republicans to stop acting like idiots.
- July added 162k
- May revised downward from 195k to 176k; June revised downward from 195k to 188k
- Government added jobs this month: 1k
Also, read this op-ed by former EPA administrators under Republicans presidents telling Republicans to stop acting like idiots.
McConnell losing would be amazing.
There's already SuperPAC ads up on both sides running regularly in Louisville, plus the Tea Party guy running against McConnell is running a bunch of ads. Ridiclous considering the election isn't for 15 months.
The Librarian
Banned
Well, huh. I didn't know this, but apparently Republicans here in NC eliminated the annual no-sales-tax weekend in their budget. So this weekend will be the last sales-tax free weekend.
Lame.
Lame.
NYCmetsfan
Banned
Republicans raising taxes it seems.Well, huh. I didn't know this, but apparently Republicans here in NC eliminated the annual no-sales-tax weekend in their budget. So this weekend will be the last sales-tax free weekend.
Lame.
If it affects poor and middle class people.
PhoenixDark
Banned
Republicans seem to like regressive taxes. I wonder why...
Well, huh. I didn't know this, but apparently Republicans here in NC eliminated the annual no-sales-tax weekend in their budget. So this weekend will be the last sales-tax free weekend.
Lame.
God damn! South Carolina is looking better and better!!!
Ugh, I hate working for the IRS in a Republican state. The amount of false information I hear to justify being a federal employee and voting Republican is mind boggling. They have no idea how much they're being screwed by their own party not only as a federal employee but as a middle class citizen.
I just overheard a conversation about how NTEU is against Obamacare because it will take our federal benefits away... I sent both people taking part in this conversation a link to set them strait. NTEU is not against Obamacare, they are against HR 1780 introduced by David Camp (a republican) that will force Federal employees into exchanges designed for people that do not get coverage through their employers... In other words, a bill to take away our current coverage which Obamacare does not do.
I just overheard a conversation about how NTEU is against Obamacare because it will take our federal benefits away... I sent both people taking part in this conversation a link to set them strait. NTEU is not against Obamacare, they are against HR 1780 introduced by David Camp (a republican) that will force Federal employees into exchanges designed for people that do not get coverage through their employers... In other words, a bill to take away our current coverage which Obamacare does not do.
Mike Reynolds, a Republican Oklahoma state rep, launched this website... against the uber-conservative Speaker of the House, T.W. Shannon. Apparently Shannon just isn't crazy enough.
http://www.shannonforcongress.com/shannonforcongress/menu.asp
Some cutting-edge web design going on here.
http://www.shannonforcongress.com/shannonforcongress/menu.asp
Some cutting-edge web design going on here.
rocketknight
Member
Mike Reynolds, a Republican Oklahoma state rep, launched this website... against the uber-conservative Speaker of the House, T.W. Shannon. Apparently Shannon just isn't crazy enough.
http://www.shannonforcongress.com/shannonforcongress/menu.asp
Some cutting-edge web design going on here.
Less offended by the web design and more offended by the racist dogwhistles. I didn't get past the first section but that was enough for me.
Edit: I couldn't help myself, scrolled to the end, and encountered
Should we promote someone as a leader in the GOP because of their race/ethnicity/gender?
lolgop
Don't get me wrong, I think Shannon is terrible. But Reynolds is a flat-out nut.Less offended by the web design and more offended by the racist dogwhistles. I didn't get past the first section but that was enough for me.
Edit: I couldn't help myself, scrolled to the end, and encountered
lolgop
Mike Reynolds, a Republican Oklahoma state rep, launched this website... against the uber-conservative Speaker of the House, T.W. Shannon. Apparently Shannon just isn't crazy enough.
http://www.shannonforcongress.com/shannonforcongress/menu.asp
Some cutting-edge web design going on here.
I was going to mention you always have crackpots with no chance of accomplishing anything launching sites like this, but then I see it's an elected official...
Christ.
Yeah, the GOP has done some severe damage to the state over the last few years. It's not as bad as Kansas, but it could get there.I was going to mention you always have crackpots with no chance of accomplishing anything launching sites like this, but then I see it's an elected official...
Christ.
Escape Goat
Member
The House just voted and passed the 40th repeal/defunding of Obamacare. Keep fucking that chicken.
How to Turn a Red State Blue
My first political contribution of 2013. Gave to Heidi Heitkamp and Claire McCaskill last year, as well.
Her name is Alison Lundergan Grimes, and a new poll has her ahead of Mitch McConnell in the race for his Senate seat. Kentucky might not be so red after all, writes Michael Tomasky.
My first political contribution of 2013. Gave to Heidi Heitkamp and Claire McCaskill last year, as well.
PhoenixDark
Banned
Mike Reynolds, a Republican Oklahoma state rep, launched this website... against the uber-conservative Speaker of the House, T.W. Shannon. Apparently Shannon just isn't crazy enough.
http://www.shannonforcongress.com/shannonforcongress/menu.asp
Some cutting-edge web design going on here.
It has been widely reported that Shannon is the First Black Republican Speaker of a State House in the United States and in fact he has flown around the nation attending events proclaiming this.
It has also been reported that he is the first Native American Speaker. How is this possible. What percentage of a particular ethnicity should you be in order to claim you are that ethnic group?
More importantly why is this significant if we want to promote a color blind society?
wow
Aaron Strife
Banned
Kentucky is already heavily Democratic at the state level, it just needs to shift there on the federal level. Obama isn't popular there because... well... And the Democrats there will always have to take supportive positions on coal and energy that can sap some energy from the race from out-of-staters.How to Turn a Red State Blue
My first political contribution of 2013. Gave to Heidi Heitkamp and Claire McCaskill last year, as well.
But let's be real here, any progressive would much rather deal with Joe Manchin than Mitch McConnell. Every Democratic senator is to the left of even the most liberal Republican senator. I'm okay with red state senators going against the grain on one or two pet issues if that's what it takes to get them elected.
PhoenixDark
Banned
Kentucky is already heavily Democratic at the state level, it just needs to shift there on the federal level. Obama isn't popular there because... well... And the Democrats there will always have to take supportive positions on coal and energy that can sap some energy from the race from out-of-staters.
But let's be real here, any progressive would much rather deal with Joe Manchin than Mitch McConnell. Every Democratic senator is to the left of even the most liberal Republican senator. I'm okay with red state senators going against the grain on one or two pet issues if that's what it takes to get them elected.
thanks for reminding me of Blanche Lincoln god dammit!
John McCain's comments on Russia giving Snowden asylum are just batshit insane.
I'm starting to become convinced he would've did something stupid if he were President leading to either irreparable damage of relations with the Russians or war in pretty much every middle eastern country that didn't bow to our every whim.
I'm starting to become convinced he would've did something stupid if he were President leading to either irreparable damage of relations with the Russians or war in pretty much every middle eastern country that didn't bow to our every whim.
John McCain's comments on Russia giving Snowden asylum are just batshit insane.
I'm starting to become convinced he would've did something stupid if he were President leading to either irreparable damage of relations with the Russians or war in pretty much every middle eastern country that didn't bow to our every whim.
That's pretty much the exact reason I didn't vote for him back when the elections happening and I was still a middle of the road voter.
Can people currently buy health insurance without worrying about pre-existing conditions, or does that not apply until the individual mandate kicks in?
That kicks in with the exchanges and the rest of the law in January.
They can start shopping in the exchanges in October, for coverage starting next year.
That kicks in with the exchanges and the rest of the law in January.
They can start shopping in the exchanges in October, for coverage starting next year.
I see. At first I thought people could already do that, but that wouldn't make sense since I figure that would cause a downward spiral in costs.
The Librarian
Banned
PhoenixDark
Banned
That kicks in with the exchanges and the rest of the law in January.
They can start shopping in the exchanges in October, for coverage starting next year.
Isn't the pre-existing condition pool currently open though? I know it's pretty expensive (obviously).
Also, I asked cause that would mean that the RedState douche who was hospitalized without health insurance, won't have to worry about being denied for his recent medical troubles, thanks to Obamacare.
Oh, also too, this is from one of his siblings:
lol, some defense.
Oh, also too, this is from one of his siblings:
The "facts" of the article are incorrect anyway! Caleb hasn't been writing for over a year and he is unemployed! The fund was set up for his kids *my nieces, I am FURIOUS at the so called writer at KOS for number one having his facts COMPLETELY wrong and number 2 taking this as a political thing, it started as a fund for the kids to get school stuff. I am fuming! Thank you so much for posting this, I am so mad that I would not have been as kind. Side note: Caleb is unaware that this fund is even set up! Some people donating are saying that he has been reduced to begging, makes me so furious.
lol, some defense.
NYCmetsfan
Banned
Where does this notion that people in Europe and Canada hate their health care? I've never once heard it and there is no political movement calling for doing anything but expanding it. I was just listening to Hannity and heard this stated as fact because a few people come down for specialty services. Do they think this would end with single payer? Do specialty doctors not exist for the elderly since they are all covered by social security and Medicare?
It's baffling
It's baffling
- Status
- Not open for further replies.