Starting to think Bernie have been the better choice. Polled WAY better than Trump and it would have kept his insane supporters in line.
People like you guys don't care about their top issues like blocking TPP. How better to get you to pay attention than to hijack the DNC on live TV?
People like you guys don't care about their top issues like blocking TPP. How better to get you to pay attention than to hijack the DNC on live TV?
People like you guys don't care about their top issues like blocking TPP. How better to get you to pay attention than to hijack the DNC on live TV?
I didn't get a reply in the official thread. What was that last big AYE that everybody seemed to agree on? I missed it on my commute home.
Bernie supporters at the convention are so insufferable I'm mentally making them all look exactly like Augustin from Looking in my head.
People like you guys don't care about their top issues like blocking TPP. How better to get you to pay attention than to hijack the DNC on live TV?
You've got it completely backwards.
Their behavior has made me care -less-, not more.
So you reject the premise that a protest is meant to give issues exposure, not change persuade people?Well, it's hard as shit not making me sympathetic to their cause.
So you reject the premise that a protest is meant to give issues exposure, not change persuade people?
When a child cries and throws a tantrum because he didn't get what he wanted, you don't reward him.Starting to think Bernie have been the better choice. Polled WAY better than Trump and it would have kept his insane supporters in line.
these Bernie-or-Bust maniacs are more against Hillary than they are against Trump.
they never booed Trump yet
If he can't keep his insane supporters in line now... I think you need to take a break and go catch Pokemon or something
Fair enough, my underlying point is Sanders is probably most to blame for the current situation. Several of us have had this concern since he went negative, and were told that things got more ugly in the 2008 primary. People failed to realize the type of negative matters. His line of negative attacks went at the legitimacy of the election.
You said it was "how the DNC was run during the election".
Sanders was by far the primary creator of that perception, not the DNC.
The list of reasons you came up with, were not even the primary reasons brought up by the Sanders campaign.
When a child cries and throws a tantrum because he didn't get what he wanted, you don't reward him.
People like you guys don't care about their top issues like blocking TPP. How better to get you to pay attention than to hijack the DNC on live TV?
Let me quote a Bernie or Buster I live with.I mentioned this in chat, but it's not even up in the air. The people that are booing and chanting are far louder when a person of color or a woman is speaking.
I'm not sure what that means or what that says about these idiots who do not represent liberals, progressives or even Bernie's ideas.
Literally anything else.
Also for those people arguing for the "personal endorsement" model of voting, here is NOAM CHOMSKY TO EXPLAIN THAT THEY'RE STUPID:
https://twitter.com/mehdirhasan/status/757690644466892800
FUCK YOU DON'T VOTE THIRD PARTY
Oh man, the irony of Bernie surrogates complaining about tone
Let me quote a Bernie or Buster I live with.
"Fuck the blacks. They don't decide this election."
LITERALLY INACCURATE
Also, I mentioned this in chat, but the only thing I blame Bernie for here is really bad delegate selection. Just total fuckup if he knew he would eventually need to concede to not choose delegates with loyalties to him personally and not to THE MOVEMENT.
Why would he have needed to do that? That's obvious.I'm sad that Trump never said "You little fuck, I got money stacks bigger than you." to Rubio.
What a missed opportunity.
George poll:
Trump: 46
Hillary: 44
.... Okay.
She'll give 'em the business.Sarah Silverman speaking tonight - that could be something to see.
Just like I thought Cenk is fucking delusional. If you concede anything to these guys they will point out something else,and then you are in this game that whatever concession you give is not good enough.
.
My dad is not quantitatively inclined or evidence seeking. I show him the demographics of this election, I show him how barrack lost 58% of the white vote, I show him how there are more minorities now and they've coalesced even moreso around Hillary, and he still doesn't care. He's white so he feels left behind by the special interest groups.LITERALLY INACCURATE
You guys are insane. The boos are a fairly small minority. Not a big deal at all.
Fair enough, my underlying point is Sanders is probably most to blame for the current situation. Several of us have had this concern since he went negative, and were told that things got more ugly in the 2008 primary. People failed to realize the type of negative matters. His line of negative attacks went at the legitimacy of the election.
You said it was "how the DNC was run during the election".
Sanders was by far the primary creator of that perception, not the DNC.
The list of reasons you came up with, were not even the primary reasons brought up by the Sanders campaign.
A) The lack of candidates had nothing to do with the DNC. Most people decided they didn't feel like running what would be a losing campaign. Clinton was more qualified than she was 8 years ago and her campaign staff was better than it was 8 years ago.
B) The Democratic debates were never going to catch headlines like the Republican debates because at no points were there going to be 17 candidates and the shit-flinging was never going to get so bad. It's one thing to argue there should have been more debates or at different times but there is nothing to suggest they would have made a lick of difference.
C) Are you arguing its the DNC's fault they got hacked and that they deserved it? I'm not sure I follow.
D) There's a difference between differing ideas and petulant children who don't seem to get how politics work or even understand how half the systems they are complaining about work (free trade, banks, etc.). Again we are talking about the fringe.It's not much different than the far-right complaining about Mexicans and Muslims - they just want an easy target for their hate, they don't want to understand the actual source of their woes.
E) You've brought up same-sex marriage more than once. Why? That isn't an idea that Sanders supporters brought with them. That's something Democrats have been working on for a while. Sorry that politicians that have been at this for decades had to navigate an anti-SS marriage electorate a few decades ago?
Holy fucking shit enough of this nonsense. Is this like "diabolising" to the 10th degree? Yes let's give it to the man who has never been seriously vetted, ran an inferior campaign, has a myopic campaign message, has less experience building coalitions, can't answer FP questions worth a damn most of the time, etc.
I think he's the headliner before Michelle so... Maybe 8 or 9-ish?About what time does Bernie talk?
George poll:
Trump: 46
Hillary: 44
.... Okay.
I just think blame can be spread around.
Brenie probably should have backed Hillary sooner
My memory might be fuzzy but I seem to remember the attacks on obama being WAY worse than anything Bernie did so I think thats a little overstated.
And Hillary + Obama should have told DBS to pack her bags after 2014 campaign or the second the emails were leaked out. Optics of that controlled the narrative for the people going nuts right now.
I just belive that Bernie doesn't get the support and platform of a farther left vote if it wasn't down to 2 canidates.
If Bernie doesn't run Hillary clinches the nom in Iowa and I don't think thats healthy for a party to drum up support and get people registered.
A) I think the lack of candidates was the main cause to Bernie's rise. You don't go into an open primary with only 1 option. Obama would have never ran in 2016 and thats a shame.
B) They left a void in a space that was filled by the plethora of Trump debates. Democrats let the GOP control the narrative of politics for a full year.
C) The leaked emails either confirmed superstitions on how the DNC was favoring a certain candidate or lead people to belive that. The President and the Clinton Campaign not getting the resignation for a postilion that most people couldn't name if it was a trivial pursuit question was dumb
D) I'm with you with many of the people acting like children I just feel like the DNC and others sat on their hands and prayed that everyone would forget about the email scandle. DWS should have resigned or gone on public tv to admonish the comments in the strongest possible language then follow it up with her resignation. Instead she wanted to slam a hammer.
E) I bring up same sex marriage because an issue like that was viewed as too extremist for the democratic party to adopt and only changed recently. I want people who question issues like that as part of my party and questioning whether or not something is right or wrong. Society moves forward and I have no idea what will be the next social change we lean towards but I want to hear the ideas in the party.
I think he's the headliner before Michelle so... Maybe 8 or 9-ish?
...you mean Georgia?
...you mean Georgia?
She'll give 'em the business.
I just think blame can be spread around.
Brenie probably should have backed Hillary sooner
My memory might be fuzzy but I seem to remember the attacks on obama being WAY worse than anything Bernie did so I think thats a little overstated.
And Hillary + Obama should have told DBS to pack her bags after 2014 campaign or the second the emails were leaked out. Optics of that controlled the narrative for the people going nuts right now.
I just belive that Bernie doesn't get the support and platform of a farther left vote if it wasn't down to 2 canidates.
If Bernie doesn't run Hillary clinches the nom in Iowa and I don't think thats healthy for a party to drum up support and get people registered.
A) I think the lack of candidates was the main cause to Bernie's rise. You don't go into an open primary with only 1 option. Obama would have never ran in 2016 and thats a shame.
B) They left a void in a space that was filled by the plethora of Trump debates. Democrats let the GOP control the narrative of politics for a full year.
C) The leaked emails either confirmed superstitions on how the DNC was favoring a certain candidate or lead people to belive that. The President and the Clinton Campaign not getting the resignation for a postilion that most people couldn't name if it was a trivial pursuit question was dumb
D) I'm with you with many of the people acting like children I just feel like the DNC and others sat on their hands and prayed that everyone would forget about the email scandle. DWS should have resigned or gone on public tv to admonish the comments in the strongest possible language then follow it up with her resignation. Instead she wanted to slam a hammer.
E) I bring up same sex marriage because an issue like that was viewed as too extremist for the democratic party to adopt and only changed recently. I want people who question issues like that as part of my party and questioning whether or not something is right or wrong. Society moves forward and I have no idea what will be the next social change we lean towards but I want to hear the ideas in the party.
she recently told people to quit being assholes and vote for Hillary