@dramatis: Sexism is bad and it clearly hurt Clinton a lot but is there really any need for you to stan for May or LePen? Especially Le Pen? Like am I supposed to feel bad sexism might have kept a Nazi from being president of France? I feel super bad about what it did to Clinton but you can make the argument that "sexism is real and its bad" without propping up women most of us wouldn't want to hold office for legit, non-sexist reasons.
Well, I guess we're going to have to have the president come to Congress and testify under oath to solve this riddle.Trump broke his Twitter silence
@realDonaldTrump:
Despite so many false statements and lies, total and complete vindication...and WOW, Comey is a leaker!
Ha, everything was a lie except for when he was totally vindicated. It's going to be amusing watching Trump go around thinking he has nothing to worry about.
I'm sure he'll go about seeing how right he was about firing Comey because he was a L👏 E 👏 A 👏 K👏 E 👏 R
I await the IC going "bitch,'please" and going ham again.
An Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll released Friday shows Democrat Jon Ossoff has a 7-point edge over Republican Karen Handel in the nationally-watched race to represent Georgias 6th District.
The poll of likely voters has Ossoff leading Handel by a 51-44 margin ahead of the June 20 runoff. About 5 percent of voters are undecided. The margin of error is 4 percentage points.
Its one of a several recent polls that show Ossoff with an advantage in the contest, although most other surveys show a tighter race.
The findings show Ossoff has an enormous lead over Handel among women, leading 60-34. The Republican is beating Ossoff among male voters by a 52-41 margin. He has a solid advantage over Handel among younger voters, while she has a slim majority of voters who are over 65.
Fox and Friends going ham sayin Comey may have committed a felony
Acknowledging the role sexism plays in our politics is not "propping up" bad women.
Everyone is easily zeroing in on ideology and political spectrum, but I can very easily see another obvious difference between
Trump, Corbyn, Macron
and
Hillary, May, LePen
But in a space filled with dudes, the first response to that argument is always, "This has nothing to do with gender."
Ascribing one answer to elections is probably a bad idea.
Time to move on guys, healthcare fight this month. Again.
How come this always happens on gaf
Everyone is easily zeroing in on ideology and political spectrum, but I can very easily see another obvious difference between
Trump, Corbyn, Macron
and
Hillary, May, LePen
But in a space filled with dudes, the first response to that argument is always, "This has nothing to do with gender."
Ascribing one answer to elections is probably a bad idea.
Time to move on guys, healthcare fight this month. Again.
From what I'm hearing about DUP this might be a lateral move. If not a turn for the worse.Nice to wake up to some sanity returning to the world. I was getting worried about the UK, for awhile there they seemed to be on an even faster track to chaos than we are
From what I'm hearing about DUP this might be a lateral move. If not a turn for the worse.
I highly doubt we will get a "better left" in the US.It's not about whether they are good or bad, it is acknowledging that good or bad, women in politics have an extra weight to carry.
I want to be happy about a revitalized left. Then I look at the folks who rep it in the US.
Jacobin and Intercept, Adam Johnson, TYT, Nina Turner, Cornel West, etc, nevermind Bernie.
And I just think, "I want a better left". One that can actually engage the base.
Looks to me like an ineffective government that doesn't do anything until the next election when Labour finally hits the killing blow and fully takes over.
But I don't really know much about UK politics, just seemed to be the feeling in the election thread.
It's still an interesting discussion with regard to May. Her pitch was "strong and stable" both having gender association with regard to leadership. The way in which May acts to try and present these are probably more punished as a woman.
But also she was just a bit shit.
Also lol Nina Turner.
I don't think it's a case of stanning for May or LePen. I'm pointing out that they're all women, and in modern society, women have disadvantages, regardless of their ideology or not.@dramatis: Sexism is bad and it clearly hurt Clinton a lot but is there really any need for you to stan for May or LePen? Especially Le Pen? Like am I supposed to feel bad sexism might have kept a Nazi from being president of France? I feel super bad about what it did to Clinton but you can make the argument that "sexism is real and its bad" without propping up women most of us wouldn't want to hold office for legit, non-sexist reasons.
https://twitter.com/SenateDems/status/873001941521108992
Claire McCaskill asked about AHCA.
Watch it.
I mean Thatcher underwent voice coaching to be taken seriously. She had to balance being acceptably "ladylike" but not so much of a lady that the concept of her being powerful was at odds. She was also reviled but that's presumably as much policy as personality.
I don't think it's a case of stanning for May or LePen. I'm pointing out that they're all women, and in modern society, women have disadvantages, regardless of their ideology or not.
Suppose a woman did what Jeremy Corbyn did within the Labour Party and clung to power regardless of criticism. He was attacked for incompetence and ineptitude, but a woman in his place would be vilified for being a power-hungry bitch. She wouldn't be recognized for her policies or positions, but for her audacity to be ambitious.
I threw out the sexism argument because most men tend to dismiss the gender argument almost instantly. But obviously, sexism is always present when a female is present amidst a bunch of males. My suggestion is, if people are going to be the first in line to dismiss gender, then they might also have to reconsider their other assumptions.
But I don't expect they will, so I suppose this whole argument is moot.
With sexism, my observation on GAF is that guys tend to downplay gender dynamics. A lot. GAF is male-dominated, and men have different priorities. If we did a hypothetical election where the choice is between a female Nazi and a rapist male, I expect that GAF would lean towards the male, because GAF can be male and minority but not female.
There would be excuses of all sorts for the male, while the female would be demonized. The female doesn't even have to be a Nazi for guys to prefer the rapist male; I remember ryotaromama (?) being very enamored of Clinton but hating Hillary's guts for his projecting of her thinking "it's her turn".
And sexism is bad regardless of whether or not the woman is good or bad. Making that exemption is kind of justifying the position that white people have about black people: only willing to help "the good ones".
He had a physiological speech disorder. :/Re. voice coaching - so did the former King of Britain and Ed Miliband. She had a bad voice.
https://twitter.com/SenateDems/status/873001941521108992
Claire McCaskill asked about AHCA.
Watch it.
Don't get me wrong I'm not suggesting the "downplay social issues", "talk less about minorities", etc narrative some people have crafted. I think that is bullshit. And I've denounced it on here countless times that we can't do that.
But Hillary did not hit the marks. She fell off several percentage points with black voters and Latinos. Virtually every minority demographic there is she did worse with except Asian voters if I remember correctly split more towards her than Obama.
https://twitter.com/SenateDems/status/873001941521108992
Claire McCaskill asked about AHCA.
Watch it.
Can't at the moment. What's up?
I don't think it's a case of stanning for May or LePen. I'm pointing out that they're all women, and in modern society, women have disadvantages, regardless of their ideology or not.
Suppose a woman did what Jeremy Corbyn did within the Labour Party and clung to power regardless of criticism. He was attacked for incompetence and ineptitude, but a woman in his place would be vilified for being a power-hungry bitch. She wouldn't be recognized for her policies or positions, but for her audacity to be ambitious.
I'm not asking you to feel bad that sexism might have kept a Nazi from being president of France. In the context of my suggestion, people have already jumped to conclusions about what the UK election should apparently mean for US elections, and what kind of strategy we should have going forward, when obviously there are a myriad of other possible reasons for why voters realigned in UK (not only to Labour but also the weird movements to Tory), as well as the tacit understanding that the US and the UK do differ in many areas.
I threw out the sexism argument because most men tend to dismiss the gender argument almost instantly. But obviously, sexism is always present when a female is present amidst a bunch of males. My suggestion is, if people are going to be the first in line to dismiss gender, then they might also have to reconsider their other assumptions.
But I don't expect they will, so I suppose this whole argument is moot.
With sexism, my observation on GAF is that guys tend to downplay gender dynamics. A lot. GAF is male-dominated, and men have different priorities. If we did a hypothetical election where the choice is between a female Nazi and a rapist male, I expect that GAF would lean towards the male, because GAF can be male and minority but not female. There would be excuses of all sorts for the male, while the female would be demonized. The female doesn't even have to be a Nazi for guys to prefer the rapist male; I remember ryotaromama (?) being very enamored of Clinton but hating Hillary's guts for his projecting of her thinking "it's her turn".
And sexism is bad regardless of whether or not the woman is good or bad. Making that exemption is kind of justifying the position that white people have about black people: only willing to help "the good ones".
So are these people like our Tea Party, or are they actually like proper nazis?
God I hope Mueller presents his final results in October 2018.Muller getting more people together.
http://www.nationallawjournal.com/i...obe?cmp=share_twitter&slreturn=20170509102445
Mueller Enlists Top Criminal Law Expert for Russia Probe
Deputy solicitor general Michael Dreeben, who has argued more than 100 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and oversees the Justice Departments criminal appellate docket, will be assisting Mueller on a part-time basis, according to sources familiar with the arrangement.
While helping Mueller, Dreeben will continue in his role in the solicitor generals office, with other lawyers in the office pitching in to help him with upcoming criminal cases.
The move signals that Mueller is seeking advice on the complexities that have arisen already in the investigations, including what constitutes obstruction of justice.
"Michael Dreeben is to criminal law what Robert Mueller is to investigations, former acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal said Thursday night. Literally the very best. Yet another sign of how serious Mueller is about this matter." Now a partner at Hogan Lovells, Katyal has been a key figure in challenging President Donald Trumps travel ban.
God I hope Mueller presents his final results in October 2018.
I honestly see this ending by the Summer. I know it sounds crazy but the FBI was probably far enough along.
I honestly see this ending by the Summer. I know it sounds crazy but the FBI was probably far enough along.
What's kind of funny is Fall 2018 is a pretty decent estimate for the timeline of the investigation.If he's still getting people together now, there's no way he's ready to announce any findings for a good while. Doing it in the Fall of 2018 would be fuckery that I'd live for.
I think we got at least a year or two more left.