ShadowSwordmaster
Banned
Seems reasonable enough.Yates warned the White House about Flynn. She got fired/resigned I give it a 95% shot something will be said.
Seems reasonable enough.Yates warned the White House about Flynn. She got fired/resigned I give it a 95% shot something will be said.
April 29-May 1, 2017
April 29-May 1, 2017
because the Dem latino bench is sadly really empty.Who keeps pushing the Castros as the Dems "young bench"? Good lord. If one of them wants to be Vice President, they should at least win, I don't know, a Senate seat or something.
Like is this actually coming from the party, or do they just have really good press offices?
April 29-May 1, 2017
True, and I am hopeful that it'll come down to a question that'll be easy to answer by then: which of them is best at attacking Trump, and is she/he likeable?This conversation really does show that it's way too early to discuss this question. Literally every possible candidate is being mentioned.
April 29-May 1, 2017
because the Dem latino bench is sadly really empty.
Getting better. O'Rourke, those three from those gerrymandered strip districts near Brownsville TX, Garcetti, Cortez-Mastro.
The closeness of the AHCA vote really emphasizes how important every House race is. If Ossoff had clinched 50 percent last month and Thompson had won his race, the bill would've lost by one vote instead of passing by two.
Any other reasons why I would or wouldn't like to see Sanders run in 2020 are ultimately dwarfed by the fact that, I'm sorry, he's too old. He's going to be what, 78 in 2020?
O'Rouke is white?
O'Rouke is white?
Technically that would mean he's Hispanic but not Latino? lolFour generations of his family are from El Paso and speaks Spanish. Thats honorary hispanic at least.
It passed by 4, so it would've won by 1 if those races were won by Democrats.The closeness of the AHCA vote really emphasizes how important every House race is. If Ossoff had clinched 50 percent last month and Thompson had won his race, the bill would've lost by one vote instead of passing by two.
Gretchen Whitmer 2020, as long as Gretchen Whitmer 2018 goes well.
I'm kind of interested why the GOP isn't pushing on repealing Social Security.
I think a Social Security repeal bill would have the same approval ratings and electoral impact as the AHCA.
And the savings to the rich would obviously be much larger.
I'm kind of interested why the GOP isn't pushing on repealing Social Security.
I think a Social Security repeal bill would have the same approval ratings and electoral impact as the AHCA.
And the savings to the rich would obviously be much larger.
If them losing big time in 2018 is a foregone conclusion, they don't really have anything to lose by going after SS.I'm kind of interested why the GOP isn't pushing on repealing Social Security.
I think a Social Security repeal bill would have the same approval ratings and electoral impact as the AHCA.
And the savings to the rich would obviously be much larger.
People have a strong grasp of Social Security and its benefits. I'd wager it's easier to run a war against ACA/Obamacare's more obscure benefits than an attack against a clear cut benefit of social security.
I mean, I assume Corker and Fischer like being in the Senate. It can get much much worse for them.If them losing big time in 2018 is a foregone conclusion, they don't really have anything to lose by going after SS.
The closeness of the AHCA vote really emphasizes how important every House race is. If Ossoff had clinched 50 percent last month and Thompson had won his race, the bill would've lost by one vote instead of passing by two.
I think a Social Security repeal bill would have the same approval ratings and electoral impact as the AHCA.
.
I've kind of lost all hope for Michigan at the state level. White Resentment has swallowed that state whole.
If them losing big time in 2018 is a foregone conclusion, they don't really have anything to lose by going after SS.
I mean, I assume Corker and Fischer like being in the Senate. It can get much much worse for them.
you can't change SS in reconciliation
I like how it's specifically written that way too. Social Security is singled out as being untouchable using reconciliation.
just goes to show how deeply unpopular the idea of fucking with SS is
The AHCA has a 17% approval rating and caused the biggest donation day to House Dems ever.
I don't think a Social Security repeal bill would have a lower approval rating or more extreme reaction than that.
The AHCA is less popular than TARP (TARP was good, but that's not the point), it's basically the least popular bill you can write.
you can't change SS in reconciliation
Senate Republicans plan to dramatically overhaul the House ObamaCare replacement bill that passed Thursday and are warning the process could take weeks.
The House bill, the American Health Care Act, has raised an array of concerns among Senate Republicans, chiefly among lawmakers from swing states who are opposed to the cap on ObamaCare's Medicaid expansion that would take effect in 2020.
GOP senators are also troubled by analyses that the legislation would significantly cut federal subsidies for people between the ages of 50 and 65, especially in rural areas such as Maine, Montana, Nebraska and North Carolina.
Senate Republican Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) announced Thursday that there would no ”arbitrary deadlines" for the healthcare legislation, setting up an open-ended process.
”We're going through the issues methodically," he said. ”The House passing the bill gives us a little bit more of a sense of urgency, but it's going to take a while."
Senate Republicans say the bill in its current form cannot pass, and some of them privately question whether it will ever get a floor vote. There's also skepticism in the conference that they will be able to cobble together 51 votes behind any plan.
McConnell initially hoped to pass the House healthcare reform bill through the Senate quickly.
He first eyed the last week of March for the job, but the political calculations changed after Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) failed to muster enough votes for the legislation on March 24 and pulled it from the floor.
As it's become increasingly clear how much opposition there is within the Senate to the bill, McConnell has opted for a less ambitious timeline.
WSJ article about Senate Committee asking for documents and interviews with 4 Trump associates RE: Russia. Page is just completely stupid.
Is this old? Said updated but wasn't sure if I've seen it.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/332025-senate-gop-vows-big-changes-for-obamacare-bill
It seems like the job for the Senate has gotten much harder. They are waiting for the CBO report and I think waiting to see if the bill satisfy the rules. I think those will settle the fact if they start over. However, I believe if the CBO report is much, much worse they will scrape the bill altogether because otherwise they would have to do a lot more work to change it.
How much Parlimentarian fuckery will we see from the GOP to get this thing passed through reconciliation? Or is it worth nuking the filibuster over?
No I posted it a page ago. It happened this past week they are getting ready for interviews in the coming weeks.
How much Parlimentarian fuckery will we see from the GOP to get this thing passed through reconciliation? Or is it worth nuking the filibuster over?
This thing is absolute poison in its current form and McConnell cares about his ass most of all, not Trump's.How much Parlimentarian fuckery will we see from the GOP to get this thing passed through reconciliation? Or is it worth nuking the filibuster over?
What's wrong with Spicy
How many veteran Democrats named Jason do we have to flood the midterms with?Cook has started reevaluating House races in the wake of the AHCA (even if the Rep voted against it)
CO-6 now tossup. Kander Clone Jason Crow seems a pretty good candidate!