Spoiled Milk
Banned
"Can you explain what libertarianism is to me?"Just listen to this garbage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGAO100hYcQ
"Can you explain what libertarianism is to me?"Just listen to this garbage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGAO100hYcQ
Christie thing seems like a rumor.
Interesting: A few GOP Senators now privately discussing what they can do, beyond mere statements. Eg, withhold votes for Trump nominees...
https://twitter.com/BillKristol/status/862400683273846784
I have always been firm in believing that Comey is neither a good guy or a bad guy.
You honestly don't see how mass email dumps through Wikileaks was a calculated attempt to deligitemize the Clinton campaign, which was already hurting from an email scandal? Most people probably couldn't tell you the difference between Clintons email server, the dnc emails, and podesta's emails. Hell I'd argue that was the point of mass releases who cares what's in it it's a "bad look".John Podesta's account was phished in March.
And I'm still missing what the plan of this whole conspiracy was supposed to be. It still looks like the Underpants Gnomes business plan to me.
1. Release boring e-mails.
2. ???
3. Putin becomes President.
Just listen to this garbage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGAO100hYcQ
What the deal with the single painted red finger nail?
Speaking of which, CNN aired pics of Spicer speaking last night before all the lights were shutoff.WH sources: Highest levels incl. POTUS evaluating Sanders subbing for Spicer in briefing room. Last night an "embarrassment.. disaster."
https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/862384512084443136
It's been real Spicer.
So this was the master criminal conspiracy: have Russia acquire Democratic e-mails while you win the GOP nomination (obviously guaranteed) then Russia gobetweens Wikileaks to release the e-mails (which will obviously be heavily damaging) and you go directly to White House (because you obviously have nothing on your end that could hurt you)?You honestly don't see how mass email dumps through Wikileaks was a calculated attempt to deligitemize the Clinton campaign, which was already hurting from an email scandal? Most people probably couldn't tell you the difference between Clintons email server, the dnc emails, and podesta's emails. Hell I'd argue that was the point of mass releases who cares what's in it it's a "bad look".
Or you "benji-don't-see" how
Edit: hell trump himself appeared to not know the difference when he asked Russia to "find 30,000 missing emails"
In memory of his mother.What the deal with the single painted red finger nail?
Yeah, my reaction to the Libertarians complaining that "state action is violence" (rather than simply acknowledging it as such) is basically "So? Isn't that the point?"I'm just gonna say it
People love states
Violence is fundamental to scarcity which is fundamental to the universe, and cannot be escaped
(Except for gay space communism of course)
I don't know what the master plan was, or even if there was one at all. What I do know is it should be clear to someone of your intelligence how releasing dumps of "boring emails" was intended to damage her campaign. Why do it if you expect it will have no effect?So this was the master criminal conspiracy: have Russia acquire Democratic e-mails while you win the GOP nomination (obviously guaranteed) then Russia gobetweens Wikileaks to release the e-mails (which will obviously be heavily damaging) and you go directly to White House (because you obviously have nothing on your end that could hurt you)?
In memory of his mother.
Yeah, my reaction to the Libertarians complaining that "state action is violence" (rather than simply acknowledging it as such) is basically "So? Isn't that the point?"
So this was the master criminal conspiracy: have Russia acquire Democratic e-mails while you win the GOP nomination (obviously guaranteed) then Russia gobetweens Wikileaks to release the e-mails (which will obviously be heavily damaging) and you go directly to White House (because you obviously have nothing on your end that could hurt you)?
In memory of his mother.
Is Benji denying that the Russians tried to mess with the election by undermining Clinton?
That's two people I've heard say that today. Absolutely baffling to me, especially with the Russian metadata all over the files, the IC backing it up, and evidence of them doing the same in France (where even more Russian metadata was found).
@AliLapp
Politico reporting that 3 Trump-district GOPers (Blum, Poliquin, Upton) are all trailing in polls conducted this week.
I don't know what the master plan was, or even if there was one at all. What I do know is it should be clear to someone of your intelligence how releasing dumps of "boring emails" was intended to damage her campaign. Why do it if you expect it will have no effect?
The point I'm looking for here is where a criminal conspiracy involving Donald Trump is necessary to any of that?They thought it would hurt Hillary and make it harder for her to run the country once she won.
Yes, libertarians support state violence.Yeah, my reaction to the Libertarians complaining that "state action is violence" (rather than simply acknowledging it as such) is basically "So? Isn't that the point?"
The latter is always the situation. The state's claim to its legitimacy in performing violence is the philosophical debate.My answer to "the state has a monopoly on violence" is "I'd rather not everyone have access to violence thanks"
IA-01: Blum trails a whopping 32-47
MI-06: Upton behind 37-41
ME-02: Poliquin down 43-44
(all against unnamed Democrat)
The point I'm looking for here is where a criminal conspiracy involving Donald Trump is necessary to any of that?
And why anyone thinks we should be focused at all on a hypothetical crime that hypothetically harmed Hillary Clinton's campaign when there's you know, actual people being hurt and stuff. Might as well debate the primaries that Bernie had stolen from him again.
Yes, libertarians support state violence.
The latter is always the situation. The state's claim to its legitimacy in performing violence is the philosophical debate.
Every member of the Hawaii Congressional delegation has called for a special prosecutor on Trump-Russia.... except @TulsiGabbard
Nowhere. But it is absolutely necessary to the continued legitimacy of the republic that it be determined if something like this happened or not.The point I'm looking for here is where a criminal conspiracy involving Donald Trump is necessary to any of that?
Nowhere. But it is absolutely necessary to the continued legitimacy of the republic that it be determined if something like this happened or not.
yo there was a chapter in one of my textbooks about the badness of social contract theoryThe state derives its just powers from the consent of the governed, duhhhh
Blum and Poliquin trailing wouldn't surprise me, Obama won both districts. When people talk about "exasperated Trump supporters" that's exactly who they mean. Rural, working-class whites desperate enough to gamble on Trump.
The power is in your hands..In fairness, every member is four people.
But yes, Tulsi is the worst.
I would honestly be disappointed in him if there weren't a blurb about itI'd donate to pigeon's primary campaign
It would be conditional on mentions of opposing Nazis on his website though.
I'd donate to pigeon's primary campaign
It would be conditional on mentions of opposing Nazis on his website though.
Okay, but how?Nowhere. But it is absolutely necessary to the continued legitimacy of the republic that it be determined if something like this happened or not.
Okay, but how?
Our politics are constantly interfered with by foreign powers. Every election is subsumed with discussions about them. This goes back to the very founding elections even!
At worst here we have a foreign power that directly targeted and harmed one of our political candidates for one of our political offices. And they couldn't even get access to her e-mails, just her lackey.
It just seems like a desperate attempt to deny the legitimacy of Donald Trump as President. Why excuse the voters who elected him? Let alone give their agency, their complicity, away and grant it to a foreign state that were "officially" semi-buds with until recently.
and thisYou go to espionage with the useful idiots you have, not the useful idiots you wish you had
Okay, but how?
Our politics are constantly interfered with by foreign powers. Every election is subsumed with discussions about them. This goes back to the very founding elections even!
At worst here we have a foreign power that directly targeted and harmed one of our political candidates for one of our political offices. And they couldn't even get access to her e-mails, just her lackey. I'm not impressed at all. Judicial Watch got more of her e-mails than Russia ever did. (Officially.)
It just seems like a desperate attempt to deny the legitimacy of Donald Trump as President. Why excuse the voters who elected him? Let alone give their agency, their complicity, away and grant its power and legitimacy to a foreign state that we were "officially" semi-buds with until recently.
Senate Intel issues subpoenas for MICHAEL FLYNN documents on Russia probe
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/862433643960119296
I mean you want to talk personal ties with foreign states in both the public and private sectors exploited for political gain and profit and influencing foreign policy:
Bush.
Rumsfeld.
Cheney.
After he refused to cooperate.
Actually you can probably make a pretty good argument that Trump doesn't happen if Obama had actually put Bush on trial for torture.
The guy on CNN said Flynn will probably plead the 5th the whole time.
...could you elaborate on this?
The FBI does not have unlimited resources. I would prefer they chase actual crimes rather than highly dubious cases of corporate espionage in racketeering enterprises. One place they can start is with all those indictments they failed to file eight years ago.Those people doing bad things and these people doing bad things are not mutually exclusive.
Also, if I had a nickel every time... I'd buy a boat had name it the SS Whataboutism
I fully endorse Trump putting both in prison. If he has to run the FBI himself, so be it. I trust he will then indict himself. He looks honest to me. He probably should get a hat that says it though so I can be sure.Actually you can probably make a pretty good argument that Trump doesn't happen if Obama had actually put Bush on trial for torture.