Hootie said:Ack...did you watch it online or on Fox? I still have to check it out.
It's on the website. I wish he someone would grill McCain like this..
http://www.foxnews.com/
Hootie said:Ack...did you watch it online or on Fox? I still have to check it out.
Like Samantha Bee, she's gonna let the little hood do the thinking. :lolAPF said:Yes, and Gwen Ifill is a chick so obviously she'll be a mindless shill for someone who shares her genetic profile.
Honestly, that's more or less fair. I just kind of have a few points the comprise where people like myself fall. First of all, I'm not as staunchly for so-called entitlement programs as I am for other liberal ideals, though I do think at face value they have some merit, though admittedly, there are legitimate counterarguments. Still, I think one of my biggest resentments against these critiques is often a lack of hard quantification for how much waste we are being burdened with. I mean, how much money is going towards undeserving individuals, and what's the bottom line for the taxpayer?HokieJoe said:I don't mind for an instant helping someone who legitimately needs help, but yes, entitlement programs are a huge drain on our system. Fraud is the biggest issue I have. A huge portion of our funding comes from matching funds provided by the Fed's. The money/benefits are administered at the local level. Fraud is under reported, and not dealt with because local agencies will get their budgets cut if they take people off the welfare/medicaid/food stamp/fuel assistance rolls.
Diablos said:Sarcasm?
Anyway, all of these recent developments are very interesting, and initially troubling. However, I think it's basically turning out to be a +3 or so convention boost for McCain. If the rules were different, and the incumbent party had their convention first, Obama would be enjoying the same kind of thing right now, I'd bet. Let's not forget that he had a pretty big post-convention bounce too, but it was short-lived thanks to the DNC and RNC being right up against each other, which is all kinds of stupid -- and something that really hasn't happened before, so you really can't rely on looking at polls the same way during this short period...
Also, I think Chuck Todd said it best -- if it was really 54-44% like good old Gallup suggests, this race would be done with. States like Pennsylvania would nearly be a lock for McCain right now. They're not.
If Obama wins this election, one must seriously question Gallup's polling methods.
New polling data seen on 538 tonight is also very interesting.
Code:State/Pollster WAS NOW SWING OH Rasmussen McCain +5 McCain +7 McCain +2 MI PPP Obama +3 Obama +1 McCain +2 PA Rasmussen Obama +3 Obama +2 McCain +1 VA Rasmussen McCain +1 McCain +2 McCain +1 VA SurveyUSA McCain +1 McCain +2 McCain +1 FL Rasmussen McCain +2 TIE Obama +2 CO Rasmussen McCain +1 Obama +3 Obama +4 ==================================================== AVERAGE McCain +0.6 McCain +0.7 McCain +0.1
Ohio really starting to go for McCain based on this data, which quite honestly I had figured would happen. I never have and probably never really will consider Ohio to be a state that Obama will likely get, but I like surprises.
Virginia is kind of disappointing, but again, the state going red is nothing shocking.
Colorado with +3 Obama is VERY interesting, and good news for any Obama supporter.
Florida as a tie is quite a surprise, to be honest I don't think it will mean anything in the long run, though.
McCain sneaking up on Obama in Michigan sucks, though. Hopefully Obama will get some points back there. He can't afford to lose that state.
AniHawk said:I personally feel he'll give the better answers, but the public response will be that McCain comes out the winner because they already perceive him to be the guy better suited to foreign policy.
And all of those shifts are one or two points (except for Obama's in Colorado). If that's McCain's bounce, it's something to party about, not exactly stuff to worry about.mckmas8808 said:DUDE! FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Remember this is DIRECTLY off the heels of a Republican convention.
The numbers will move back next week in most of those states.
Yeah but McCain is a POW so...Ether_Snake said:McCain offers nothing new on foreign relations, which got the US into Iraq to being with, and which Americans are not happy about.
mckmas8808 said:DUDE! FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Remember this is DIRECTLY off the heels of a Republican convention.
The numbers will move back next week in most of those states.
Here: http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2008/09/08/breaking_news/doc48c1c8a60d6d9379155484.txtGruco said:Well that's a powerful and succinct summary. I wonder if I should keep reading.
If no Alaskan fund is set aside for rape kits, they bill the insurer. Many states due this.Beavertown said:First I've heard of this.. WTF?
Definitely gonna forward this.
So . . . what do you think about the Iraq war/occupation? A massive entitlement program for foreigners that is a huge drain on our system and based on a complete fraud.HokieJoe said:I don't mind for an instant helping someone who legitimately needs help, but yes, entitlement programs are a huge drain on our system. Fraud is the biggest issue I have.
Killthee said:
Cloudy said:It's on the website. I wish he someone would grill McCain like this..
devilhawk said:If no Alaskan fund is set aside for rape kits, they bill the insurer. Many states due this.
While the Alaska State Troopers and most municipal police agencies have covered the cost of exams, which cost between $300 to $1,200 apiece, the Wasilla police department does charge the victims of sexual assault for the tests.
HokieJoe said:Virginia will not swing to Obama IMO. Practically, it may serve Obama's purpose to put it in play and make McCain use up campaign resources here though.
Instead of having a well mannered discussion on Fraud and how it can curbed and the necessity to equal opportunity you jump to Iraq?speculawyer said:So . . . what do you think about the Iraq war/occupation? A massive entitlement program for foreigners that is a huge drain on our system and based on a complete fraud.
kkaabboomm said:the NYT article drudge was talking about earlier is out:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26615658/
translation: Obama team is gearing up to fundraise hardcore in many states, upping the ante, pressing illinois realllllly hard for money, going to press all their big donors to donate to the general campaign now...
so that'll be a nice boost from the big donors, but he's still got to make up a bunch of cash in the next 6 weeks or so. apparently August was their best month ever, but, considering $55 million was the best month, and McCain got $47 million in August (not including RNC), they better have gotten a lot more than that...
but hey, at least the NYT's admits they have no clue how much Obama raised in August, only that the fundraising team is being kicked into super hard gear now
It's the same mentality that says Montana can't possibly be close. There are preconceptions about what states can be in play this time around based on past elections. I think folks are still not realizing how wide the map is or how many states are tilting blue this year.mckmas8808 said:Okay as a Virginian this talk pisses me off from someone that wants Obama to win. Have you not seen the polling? Have you not seen the voter registering numbers in Virginia?
Do you realize that we have a DEM governor and one senator in the office now and Mark Warner WILL win the other senator seat? It's a complete toss up right now that has the possible markings on an Obama win.
AniHawk said:He sounded tired. And I think he was stammering more than usual.
I love watching these. It just shows that Obama fucking knows the the hell he's talking about.Killthee said:
More accurately, the hearsay surrounding Palin distracts from parts of her history that are legitimately questionable and deserve further exploration and clarification. Aside from that, though, I agree.Ignatz Mouse said:All the Palin dirt is fun, but I think it distracts too much. And too much of it ends up being exagerrated.
- McCain wants more military intervention like the mess we've got now
- McCain and other "fiscal conservatives" end up increasing debt
- McCain's choice of Palin is reackless and indicative of poor judgement
- McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time and was in the Senate when we got into our biggest messes.
All the Paain details are just fodder for argument and diffuse the main point-- that McCain is the worse choice for President.
AniHawk said:FL and CO numbers are weird though. Would they have had a bigger bump to Obama? Are they gonna have a bigger one in the future?
devilhawk said:And charging the victim should be read as billed the insurer. Still that doesn't make it any better
That's a good question. I imagine the city/state eats the cost. I don't know for sure though.mckmas8808 said:What if the victim doesn't have insurance? :/
Then it's their own fault. Duh, in america you don't get sick without insurance and you especially don't get raped unless you're insured.mckmas8808 said:What if the victim doesn't have insurance? :/
scorcho said:and from what i remember reading voter registration (and party self-affiliation for that matter) numbers haven't swayed many elections, especially not with the demographics that Democrats target (younger and minority voters).
Killthee said:
Steve Youngblood said:More accurately, the hearsay surrounding Palin distracts from parts of her history that are legitimately questionable and deserve further exploration and clarification. Aside from that, though, I agree.
mckmas8808 said:What if the victim doesn't have insurance? :/
I wholeheartedly agree.Ignatz Mouse said:Encapsulated in Point 3-- McCain's choice of her shows a lack of judgment. Don't spend time on the details, take it as fact that she's a terrible choice outside of vote-garnering and move on.
Sacrifices must be made for the motherland. Country first!!WickedAngel said:Then they deserve to be punished for their mistake. We wouldn't want those people leaching off of the tit of the tax payer when we've got bridges to build.
That's the scary "if".mckmas8808 said:When you read that stuff did it have a black man running for office that energized the youth vote as much as Barack? I mean lets be honest here, predicting this race this November shouldn't be compared directly to past elections.
Obama is doing things that no other campaign in history has been able to do. The only thing that has to happen is for young and black people to vote.
If that happens Obama wins easily.
Thunder Monkey said:That's the scary "if".
I've voted every chance I've gotten. We have so few ways of controlling our countries outcome as is... I'll take what I can get.
It's our others that scare me.
The African American vote I expect to be pretty much completely out in show. Historic moment, historic candidacy. The youth vote... that's the question mark. We got our choice this time. Instead of the stuffy emotionless candidate, we got the choice we seemed to rally behind. The one that inspired a lot of our ilk to vote in primaries and caucus for Christ sake.
I have hope that we'll show that level of dedication and support come election day... but you never know.
Steve Youngblood said:But moving on, this isn't the only issue. On fiscal matters, I might skew slightly liberal, but I don't really turn staunchly liberal until you hit social and foreign policy issues. Everybody is different, but in my humble opinion, these issues far outweigh quibbling over some abuse of social programs. I might be more for universal health care than I am against it, but that's really not the focal point of my vote this year.
RubxQub said:I love watching these. It just shows that Obama fucking knows the the hell he's talking about.
Get McCain under fire like that and watch him buckle so fucking hard. Palin? :lol
To be fair, she doesn't believe in equal pay. So really she'd just have to answer 75% of the questions.mckmas8808 said:Guys holy shit, how in the hell can Palin go toe to toe with O'Reilly on economics like that.
Obama held his own even though he is in the Lion's den. I got even more respect for Obama now after watching these O'Reilly interviews.
Thunder Monkey said:That's the scary "if".
I've voted every chance I've gotten. We have so few ways of controlling our countries outcome as is... I'll take what I can get.
It's our others that scare me.
The African American vote I expect to be pretty much completely out in show. Historic moment, historic candidacy. The youth vote... that's the question mark. We got our choice this time. Instead of the stuffy emotionless candidate, we got the choice we seemed to rally behind. The one that inspired a lot of our ilk to vote in primaries and caucus for Christ sake.
I have hope that we'll show that level of dedication and support come election day... but you never know.
mckmas8808 said:Okay as a Virginian this talk pisses me off from someone that wants Obama to win. Have you not seen the polling? Have you not seen the voter registering numbers in Virginia?
Do you realize that we have a DEM governor and one senator in the office now and Mark Warner WILL win the other senator seat? It's a complete toss up right now that has the possible markings on an Obama win.
Cloudy said:
Xenu is Greta's hair stylist.Kittonwy said:I went to University of Toronto, it's not really a religious school.
What did Greta Van Susteran do to her hair? Man I miss these people since they left CNN, it's like a god damn reunion.
Agent Icebeezy said:Also, from the snippets that I watched, Obama's reactions were sharper with Bill. I hope he carries that into the debates.
mckmas8808 said:But to be fair Obama has rocked youtube and other social websites. He has shirts that sell out the wazoo to us youngins. And he has a major song that's been played I think 15 million times on youtube with Will i am.
And I honestly believe that us young people want change enough to get out and vote. I don't why I'm about to say this but like Obama I trust the American people this time.
mckmas8808 said:And like I said with Olberman (a known liberal democrate) he didn't want to step on any toes that's already going to vote for him. Sorta like what Obama was like during the democrat debates.
But with O'Reilly he can go buck wild and go toe to toe, with quick back and forth (CLEAR) distinction. Like you said I hope we see that Obama in the debates. I have no reason to belief that we won't see that Obama.
When McCain lies about his record or positions I can see Obama acting the same as he has on O'Reilly's show.
HokieJoe said:Warner is a very popular politician. Kaine rode Warner's coat tails. Webb won a lark (Allen was a lock until his infamous rally comment). The war isn't popular in the suburbs of DC and Richmond, but I maintain that Virginia's base voter demographic is still quite conservative (relative to other states). But don't take me seriously, it's JMO.