minus_273 said:in a democracy you should protect the candidates. I disagree with obama but in no fucking way do i want him or his children to be injured in a terrorist attack. I also wouldnt tolerate threats against them. I doubt this comment will attract secret service attention but i think they have every right to investigate every possible threat. Did you learn nothing from RFK?
Mahadev said:OK are republicans now fake outraged about what vicious said?
minus_273 said:in a democracy you should protect the candidates. I disagree with obama but in no fucking way do i want him or his children to be injured in a terrorist attack. I also wouldnt tolerate threats against them. I doubt this comment will attract secret service attention but i think they have every right to investigate every possible threat. Did you learn nothing from RFK?
VanMardigan said:fake outrage? really? dumb fuck.
You have no chance to survive make your time.v1cious said:well i don't live in Iraq or anywhere near Alaska, so bring it on.
You greatly weaken the claim of fake moral outrage.Mahadev said:OK are republicans now fake outraged about what vicious said?
Mahadev said:OK are republicans now fake outraged about what vicious said? What about the kids that will actually die when McCain/Palin continue with Bush's policies on a war that has been disastous on economic and human level for the United States? Are you outraged about them?
minus_273 said:jesus. is this now bad poliGAF has gotten? is genuinely wishing the death of the child of someone you disagree with really acceptable behaviour?
(neutral) VanMardiganVanMardigan said:fake outrage? really? dumb fuck.
Mahadev said:OK are republicans now fake outraged about what vicious said? What about the kids that will actually die when McCain/Palin continue with Bush's policies on a war that has been disastous on economic and human level for the United States? Are you outraged about them?
speculawyer said:I don't wish any ill on her son,
speculawyer said:I'm not gonna defend his statement . . . but I gotta say that there is some weird cognitive dissonance going on though. Why do people get all worked up about an armed adult volunteer soldier heading off to a war zone when we know we routinely drop bombs that will kill innocent women & children? I don't wish any ill on her son, but it often bothers me how little we care about the other people in these conflicts.
Call it what you want . . . racism, nationalism, ethnicism . . . but it is kinda sad.
minus_273 said:the difference is no one wants innocent women and children to die. Outside of fuckwads, there arent people saying "is it wrong that I want innocent women and children to die"
Steve Youngblood said:v1cious was banned.
Can we move on?
Fatalah said:I wish fivethirtyeight would provide some insight on these national polls, instead of stupid Montana!
Americans have finally realized that it was the liberal Democrats in power this entire time. And we're ready for change.Diablos said:So according to Gallup, Congress is competitive now...
:lol This is seriously shaping up to be the most fucked up election year ever.
This year we finally get to see how stupid Americans really are.thekad said:Americans have finally realized that it was the liberal Democrats in power this entire
time. And we're ready for change.
Yes, it's wrong. This is not something you should even have to ask.v1cious said:is it wrong that i want her son to die in Iraq? i just want the reality driven home to her of what's actually happening abroad.
Last I checked George W. Bush and a tied Senate were able to deny Congressional Democrats whenever they deemed it necessary. Maybe Americans should learn how Congress works before they just get mad and throw them out.thekad said:Americans have finally realized that it was the liberal Democrats in power this entire
time. And we're ready for change.
Diablos said:So according to Gallup, Congress is competitive now...
:lol This is seriously shaping up to be the most fucked up election year ever.
It still is not a good sign.ALeperMessiah said:I don't know, it's not like this democrat-led congress is setting the approval rating charts on fire. And even if it is "competitive' there's a 0% chance they lose the majority.
Charles Krauthammer said:Informed her? Rubbish.
The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong.
Yes, Sarah Palin didn't know what it is. But neither does Charlie Gibson. And at least she didn't pretend to know -- while he looked down his nose and over his glasses with weary disdain, sighing and "sounding like an impatient teacher," as the Times noted. In doing so, he captured perfectly the establishment snobbery and intellectual condescension that has characterized the chattering classes' reaction to the mother of five who presumes to play on their stage.
Diablos said:If the Democrats lose their majority status in the House... wow.
She didn't pretend to know? What to do you call her saying "It's his world view." Just because she did a shitty job doesn't mean she did not pretend to know.laserbeam said:Yes, Sarah Palin didn't know what it is. But neither does Charlie Gibson. And at least she didn't pretend to know -- while he looked down his nose and over his glasses with weary disdain, sighing and "sounding like an impatient teacher," as the Times noted.
laserbeam said:Charles Krauthammer Inventor of phrase "Bush Doctrine" on Bush Doctrine
At times visibly nervous . . . Ms. Palin most visibly stumbled when she was asked by Mr. Gibson if she agreed with the Bush doctrine. Ms. Palin did not seem to know what he was talking about. Mr. Gibson, sounding like an impatient teacher, informed her that it meant the right of 'anticipatory self-defense.' " -- New York Times, Sept. 12
Gaborn said:I don't think it's possible. People need to remember that generally speaking an incumbent is reelected around 95% of the time. In the current climate whatever the polls say right now Republican reps have a lot more to fear than Democratic reps on average, and even if the Repubs managed to take a few seats back they wouldn't take nearly enough to take the house back.
ALeperMessiah said:Also, there are 30 retiring republicans this year, compared to 6 democrats. It's a lot harder to win a toss up seat over an incumbent seat. Pelosi will still be speaker come Jan. 3, there's little doubt.
laserbeam said:....
laserbeam said:Charles Krauthammer Inventor of phrase "Bush Doctrine" on Bush Doctrine
At times visibly nervous . . . Ms. Palin most visibly stumbled when she was asked by Mr. Gibson if she agreed with the Bush doctrine. Ms. Palin did not seem to know what he was talking about. Mr. Gibson, sounding like an impatient teacher, informed her that it meant the right of 'anticipatory self-defense.' " -- New York Times, Sept. 12
Everyone in dallas seems to like Yahoo over google, dunno why.artredis1980 said:News Markets according to Google
Yahoo (light blue) has a huge lead over CNN (orange), the others are irrelevant
Yahoo's top viewers are from Mississippi, Louisianna, SC, GA, AL, NC and Texas
http://trends.google.com/trends?q=www.yahoo.com&ctab=0&geo=US&geor=all&date=2008&sort=0
Yahoo's top viewing cities are from Miami, Herndon, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta
Basically the top viewers are all from red states for Yahoo
The top 10 searches on Google for September 12th are:
1. ray boltz
2. mccain on the view
3. gas prices by zip code
4. galveston web cameras
5. gas buddy
6. laura obzera
7. galveston tx
8. hurricane ike pictures
9. galveston weather
10. galveston daily news
MOST IMPORTANTLY
Last 30 days:
http://www.google.com/trends?q=Pali...&ctab=0&hl=en&geo=US&geor=all&date=mtd&sort=0
Palin was getting 5 times the searches to Obama on Google but they have dropped down to the extent that Obama is about to overtake her again
Biden is the least popular on google in terms of both tickets
Cloudy said:You guys will defend anything. Fact is, she was an embarrassment to herself and this country in that interview. It wasn't just the Bush Doctrine stuff.
It's ok to admit that even if you support McCain..
laserbeam said:Charles Krauthammer Inventor of phrase "Bush Doctrine" on Bush Doctrine
At times visibly nervous . . . Ms. Palin most visibly stumbled when she was asked by Mr. Gibson if she agreed with the Bush doctrine. Ms. Palin did not seem to know what he was talking about. Mr. Gibson, sounding like an impatient teacher, informed her that it meant the right of 'anticipatory self-defense.' "
-- New York Times, Sept. 12
Informed her? Rubbish.
The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong.
Yes, Sarah Palin didn't know what it is. But neither does Charlie Gibson. And at least she didn't pretend to know -- while he looked down his nose and over his glasses with weary disdain, sighing and "sounding like an impatient teacher," as the Times noted. In doing so, he captured perfectly the establishment snobbery and intellectual condescension that has characterized the chattering classes' reaction to the mother of five who presumes to play on their stage.
Tamanon said:There is nothing funnier than Krauthammer talking about snobbery and intellectual condescension.
LuCkymoON said:Everyone in dallas seems to like Yahoo over google, dunno why.