Sleeker said:Has this been posted yet?
http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/elections/campaigning/news.php?q=1221531438
The anchorage anti Palin protest
Nice
Sleeker said:Has this been posted yet?
http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/elections/campaigning/news.php?q=1221531438
The anchorage anti Palin protest
Ether_Snake said:Oh my god, try this: Hide a bit over half of the left side of the face with your hand. It's like she's just getting angrier instead of transforming into Cheney!
articles like this doesn't help the argument that Cohen has never in the tank for McCain. no. not at all.First off, the author of the editorial is not a McCain supporter. He never has been. He is a Columbia graduate who is very liberal.
scorcho said:and what does it matter that he graduated from Columbia? afraid of higher education?
It sounds like he was about to change the subject and take a shot at Obama. Doesn't seem like anything they haven't done before, so I doubt it necessitated the feed cutting out.GhaleonEB said:I haven't read many of his columns, but he's been pretty friendly to McCain in the past. Heck, this is from June, where he defends McCain's character while knocking Obama's when he backed out of public financing.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062301829.html
I get the sense that he really thought McCain would never stoop this low.
Also: watch Tucker Bounds get owned so hard the feed cuts out and bails him out.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/09/15/technical-difficulties-shut-down-damaging-mccain-interview/
Literally running from questions now?
Well, I gotta ask... how DOES an evenhanded person treat a campaign that shamelessly peddles outright lies rather than the usual distortions or half-truths?PantherLotus said:I love Matthews, but he has gone from potential Russert fill-in to an openly biased talking head. He does this thing where he tries to make cute points w/o actually holding his guests accountable that drives me nutzo.
I do like the fact that he's openly critical of the McCain campaign now, though. I just liked his even-handed from years past so much more. MSNBC lurching to the left won't make FOX go away, it will only justify their strategy.
PantherLotus said:I love Matthews, but he has gone from potential Russert fill-in to an openly biased talking head. He does this thing where he tries to make cute points w/o actually holding his guests accountable that drives me nutzo.
I do like the fact that he's openly critical of the McCain campaign now, though. I just liked his even-handed from years past so much more. MSNBC lurching to the left won't make FOX go away, it will only justify their strategy.
"I'm on your side"/Hellboy. You are charmingly abrasive. I like you.speculawyer said:It is a total flip-flop in a single statement.
McCain: "My friends, the fundamentals of our economy our sound . . . but we are going through some tough times."
Well which is it Captain Waffle?
GhaleonEB said:Also: watch Tucker Bounds get owned so hard the feed cuts out and bails him out.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/09/15/technical-difficulties-shut-down-damaging-mccain-interview/
Literally running from questions now?
The Abominable Snowman said:No offense NeoGAF, but is there a more bipartisan, center-focused forum that I can visit and read up on? I'm a far left Dem, but sometimes I get overwhelmed by the "enthusiasm" to be had here.
Aside from that, what gaffe did Bidem make earlier thats become such big news?
GhaleonEB said:I haven't read many of his columns, but he's been pretty friendly to McCain in the past. Heck, this is from June, where he defends McCain's character while knocking Obama's when he backed out of public financing.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062301829.html
I get the sense that he really thought McCain would never stoop this low.
Also: watch Tucker Bounds get owned so hard the feed cuts out and bails him out.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/09/15/technical-difficulties-shut-down-damaging-mccain-interview/
Literally running from questions now?
The Abominable Snowman said:No offense NeoGAF, but is there a more bipartisan, center-focused forum that I can visit and read up on? I'm a far left Dem, but sometimes I get overwhelmed by the "enthusiasm" to be had here.
Aside from that, what gaffe did Bidem make earlier thats become such big news?
Ether_Snake said:That Tucker guy is a really poor spokesman, and it's the second time he gets owned by a hot female reporter!
Guts Of Thor said:
Him and Obama are both alums of Columbia, though that means little. The article you both linked I had read beforehand. It doesn't even praise McCain other than the undeniable aspects of his military service. If this is the highest level of support he has given to McCain, then it furthers my point in that he isn't the definitive example or proof of media supporters turning against McCain.scorcho said:articles like this doesn't help the argument that Cohen has never in the tank for McCain. no. not at all.
Cohen never claimed he was conservative, and it wasn't beyond the realm in 2000 for moderates to support McCain - hell, Cohen states it in his very column!
and what does it matter that he graduated from Columbia? afraid of higher education?
edit: beaten by GhaleonEB
Guts Of Thor said:
Guts Of Thor said:
Byakuya769 said:Did you or the author of the article watch the entire interview played on 20/20.. cause I don't know if any of that stuff was edited. I remember most of it. On top of that, the stuff that was edited out was classic "ooooo, I don't know the answer to this essay question... better talk for a while and seem like I do". I mean saying russia/georgia was unprovoked and following that up with how unfortunate it is and how Georgia is a democratic nation doesn't really show any more knowledge on the issue. Actually show a bit of her ignorance on it.
They are not fact, they are opinion.devilhawk said:I just don't think editorials should be taken as fact so quickly.
Um, the other column was from June.I find it hard to agree with a guy's view when his only apparent proof of ever supporting a candidate is in the same paragraph where he states he no longer does.
Guts Of Thor said:I agree with you, I just thought it was funny.
Guts Of Thor said:
GIBSON: Have you ever met a foreign head of state?
PALIN: There in the state of Alaska, our international trade activities bring in many leaders of other countries.
GIBSON: And all governors deal with trade delegations.
PALIN: Right.
GIBSON: Who act at the behest of their governments.
PALIN: Right, right.
GIBSON: Im talking about somebody whos a head of state, who can negotiate for that country. Ever met one?
PALIN: I have not and I think if you go back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents, they may have the same answer that I just gave you. But, Charlie, again, weve got to remember what the desire is in this nation at this time. It is for no more politics as usual and somebodys big, fat resume maybe that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment, where, yes, theyve had opportunities to meet heads of state these last couple of weeks it has been overwhelming to me that confirmation of the message that Americans are getting sick and tired of that self-dealing and kind of that closed door, good old boy network that has been the Washington elite.
Slurpy said:
MaddenNFL64 said:Lou Dobbs hates every human being who ever existed, so thats still the same.
Newsbusters. LOL!Guts Of Thor said:
AndyIsTheMoney said:well maybe he knows better than anyone since he was probably around during the great depression
Rapping Granny said:
OH SNAP!
Rapping Granny said:
OH SNAP!
perfectchaos007 said:What? Pro-choice/pro-life positions are basically irrelivant. Most presidents are pro-life but it doesn't matter. Abortions aren't going to become magically illegal because the president is pro-life. Bush is pro-life and abortions are still legal. It takes 2/3rds of congress to be against abortion for that to happen and since democrats control the house right now...it doesn't matter that Palin is pro-life, anti-safe sex. The 1st trimester abortions are here to stay for a long long time.
AndyIsTheMoney said:yeah bristol had a choice, that girl had a choice...i guess the only one without a choice is the baby
It voted present.AndyIsTheMoney said:yeah bristol had a choice, that girl had a choice...i guess the only one without a choice is the baby
Son of Godzilla said:It voted present.
This kind of attempt to guilt trip really doesn't work coming from people that drop bombs on brown people at the drop of a hat.AndyIsTheMoney said:yeah bristol had a choice, that girl had a choice...i guess the only one without a choice is the baby
because our present conservative SC loves abortion. That's why it's still legal.Jak140 said:Supreme court appointees.
ENTHUSIASM = BADThe Abominable Snowman said:No offense NeoGAF, but is there a more bipartisan, center-focused forum that I can visit and read up on? I'm a far left Dem, but sometimes I get overwhelmed by the "enthusiasm" to be had here.
Aside from that, what gaffe did Biden make earlier thats become such big news?
Can I ask you an honest question?AndyIsTheMoney said:yeah bristol had a choice, that girl had a choice...i guess the only one without a choice is the baby
1 vote. That is pretty much it.avatar299 said:because our present conservative SC loves abortion. That's why it's still legal.
Right now the court is split about evenly between liberal and conservative judges. The next two judges to retire within the next 4-8 years will likely be liberal. As soon as they are replaced, it is very possible that Roe v. Wade could be in danger of being overturned.avatar299 said:because our present conservative SC loves abortion. That's why it's still legal.