Stoney Mason
Banned
Great interview on TDS. How people aren't charging the white house with pitchforks at this president and vice president I'll never know...
Me too. Great ad. It is nothing but the truth. Nothing the McCain campaign can say about the ad.Incognito said:Just saw the "Equal pay" ad. That's some hard hitting stuff right there. Damn.
Ok...Kittowny said:What is sensible regulation? Obviously right now what happened makes people call for more regulation, but I'm not sure if this is necessarily the best thing in the long run. CLEARLY there's a lesson learned from Merrill, Bear and Leahman, but whom was the lesson meant for? The government? Or the market participants? Why can't self-regulation improve instead of having the government take over? Why is it everytime when something bad happens the government feels the need to take control over everything?
...just look at the polls.Stoney Mason said:Great interview on TDS. How people aren't charging the white house with pitchforks at this president and vice president I'll never know...
Stoney Mason said:Great interview on TDS. How people aren't charging the white house with pitchforks at this president and vice president I'll never know...
Certainly not the area he has focused on . . . but he did work for an economic publication. And he's got some great advisors like Volker and RubinKittonwy said:Economics isn't his background, I just don't buy into this as this whole "obama is america's savior" thing.
reilo said:Can I get a roundup of today?
Voters who don't know anything about economics certainly find that favorable.speculawyer said:Do we really need the elect the guy who said he doesn't know anything about economics?
Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it.Hitokage said:Ok...
We've been down this road before, quite a few times.
Back then we set up institutions and laws to keep companies honest and accountable, and to limit the damage of future banking failures.
Fast-forward to the modern day when such companies and the political party representing them wanted these safeguards removed saying they were stifling their true earning potential saying TRUST US.
All hell breaks loose, and here you are today acting like this is entirely novel.
"Knickerbocker Trust" isn't support for a peewee football team!speculawyer said:Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it.
It really is more than just an empty saying.
Imm0rt4l said:daily show was kinda wack tonight. which is sad since the comedy in this election writes itself.
PantherLotus said:DID I JUST SEE "OBAMA ISN'T CHANGE, HE'S MORE OF THE SAME" AD ON MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL??
:lol :lol :lol :lol
Kittonwy said:AMERICA has fucked America over every possible way, people who have NO BUSINESS buying houses are buying them on mortgages approved by unscrupulous participants in the industry
Hitokage said:Ok...
We've been down this road before, quite a few times.
Back then we set up institutions and laws to keep companies honest and accountable, and to limit the damage of future banking failures.
Fast-forward to the modern day when such companies and the political party representing them wanted these safeguards removed claiming they were stifling their true earning potential saying TRUST US.
All hell breaks loose, and here you are today acting like this is entirely novel.
Ether_Snake said:Oh oh oh, Kittonwy saying that there would have been a need for regulation?
no, this - http://www.harchcapital.com/Pdfs/how to fix it- welling.pdfKittonwy said:What are you regulating? People who can't afford mortgages trying to buy houses they've got no business owning? Wouldn't common sense take care of that?
speculawyer said:Certainly not the area he has focused on . . . but he did work for an economic publication. And he's got some great advisors like Volker and Rubin
And he is by no means "america's savior" . . . but my goal is just not to have another person that totally fucks things up. Is that too much to ask for? Do we really need the elect the guy who said he doesn't know anything about economics?
why are you so surprised?polyh3dron said:OK Colbert just owned McCain's campaign harder than anyone has so far.
Tamanon said:"We should know, we've been feminists for over two weeks now!":lol :lol
You didn't even read his post, did you?Kittonwy said:I don't think it's novel at all but it's something that we've been dealing with for a long time, do you now go and take over and tell all these companies what to do after trying to deregulate the markets for decades?
:lol :lol :lolViperVisor said:
ViperVisor said:
:lol :lolViperVisor said:
Obviously not. Duh!Kittonwy said:What are you regulating? People who can't afford mortgages trying to buy houses they've got no business owning? Wouldn't common sense take care of that?
Kittonwy said:Vote for Ron Paul.
Kittonwy said:What are you regulating? People who can't afford mortgages trying to buy houses they've got no business owning? Wouldn't common sense take care of that?
Hitokage said:Ok...
We've been down this road before, quite a few times.
Back then we set up institutions and laws to keep companies honest and accountable, and to limit the damage of future banking failures.
Fast-forward to the modern day when such companies and the political party representing them wanted these safeguards removed claiming they were stifling their true earning potential saying TRUST US.
All hell breaks loose, and here you are today acting like this is entirely novel.
Kittonwy said:What are you regulating? People who can't afford mortgages trying to buy houses they've got no business owning? Wouldn't common sense take care of that?
scorcho said:besides for your utter lack of knowledge on government budgets or economic theory and policies, you're also Canadian, which means i really could give fuck all about your views on our domestic situation
:lol :lol :lolViperVisor said:
Stoney Mason said:They are just so good because they point out the fucking hypocrisy when the media won't.
speculawyer said:He can't win.
Kittonwy said:What are you regulating? People who can't afford mortgages trying to buy houses they've got no business owning? Wouldn't common sense take care of that?
Common sense doesn't last in the face of speculation frenzy. Remember how people in the 90s declared we had a "New Economy" of perpetual boom? Actually, remember the tv show made with that as the tagline just before it all came down? :lolByakuya769 said:wouldn't common sense tell lenders not to go for mortgages that they won't collect on?
That cheered me upViperVisor said:
Hitokage said:Common sense doesn't last in the face of speculation frenzy. Remember how people in the 90s declared we had a "New Economy" of perpetual boom? Actually, remember the tv show made with that as the tagline just before it all came down? :lol
Anyway, the exact same mentality cropped up with certain banks finding that certain financial devices made struggling debtors more profitable than those who paid in full on time, and since they sell the loan to somebody else anyway, people began to feel invincible even through it was all based on a housing bubble many people recognized years before it popped.