Stoney Mason
Banned
Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
Starting to reach now...
Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
First, teenagers in a basement are different from the federal government intruding on the privacy of normal citizens. It might not be legal, but at least it's not illegal activity sanctioned by the government.Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
wowGary Whitta said:Analysis of McCain's health plan, truly terrifying:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/o...r=1&scp=2&sq=mccain health&st=cse&oref=slogin
Well I don't think 'generally pleased' is very accurate. The people that did this could face prosecution.Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
We are also talking about an administration that has decided to dodge subpoenas issued by a bi-partisan investigation. Perhaps if they'd open up and share the truth, some hackers wouldn't be so eager to do unscrupulous things to find more info.Revengeance said:Second, while I don't know all of the relevant laws, I have no pity for someone who actively tries to circumvent government archiving practices by using personal email. As far as I'm concerned, the emails of those in government, as long as they do not involve matters of national security are ALREADY the property of the public, and should be available for scrutiny.
Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
I find it equally amazing that the same people that scream about how we need FISA and the Patriot security act and yell up and down that "If you're doing nothing wrong then you have nothing to worry about." are all up in arms about this.Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
No, just observing the amusing result that when these people actually do it, they only do pointless shit. Kinda like a mob boss sending out a hitman who only manages to run down the street screaming at people.Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
Revengeance said:First, teenagers in a basement are different from the federal government intruding on the privacy of normal citizens. It might not be legal, but at least it's not illegal activity sanctioned by the government.
Second, while I don't know all of the relevant laws, I have no pity for someone who actively tries to circumvent government archiving practices by using personal email. As far as I'm concerned, the emails of those in government, as long as they do not involve matters of national security are ALREADY the property of the public, and should be available for scrutiny.
You're reaching, here. To my knowledge, nothing has been found that would hurt her, and nobody is sitting here wishing that the Obama campaign would hack into her account and dig up some dirt for advertisements. Any reasonable person would be condemming this action.Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
ronito said:Fact is, she setup the email to get around some public servant laws. She should've known it would happen. Regardless of right or wrong.
speculawyer said:Well I don't think 'generally pleased' is very accurate. The people that did this could face prosecution.
Yup. Bams and Biden have been mentioning the tax element of it on the stump lately, but I'd love to see him really focus on it at some point. And this:'The Lamonster said:
The credits are pegged to increase at the rate of inflation. The only problem? Healthcare costs are going up waaaaay faster than inflation.While there might be less money in the paycheck, that would not be anything to worry about, according to Senator McCain. Thats because the government would be offering all taxpayers a refundable tax credit $2,500 for a single worker and $5,000 per family to be used to help pay for your health care.
You may think this is a good move or a bad one but its a monumental change in the way health coverage would be provided to scores of millions of Americans. Why not more attention?
Gary Whitta said:Analysis of McCain's health plan, truly terrifying:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/o...r=1&scp=2&sq=mccain health&st=cse&oref=slogin
Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
Xisiqomelir said:May I add that gov.sarah@yahoo.com is also an amazingly stupid choice of incognito address?
Steve Youngblood said:You're reaching, here. To my knowledge, nothing has been found that would hurt her, and nobody is sitting here wishing that the Obama campaign would hack into her account and dig up some dirt for advertisements. Any reasonable person would be condemming this action.
Are you insinuating that she's unfamiliar with security protocol? DID YOU FORGET RUSSIA IS NEXT DOOR TO HER?CharlieDigital said:I can only imagine if she gets into office: vp.sarah@yahoo.com. Like a giant "Hack me! NAO!" sign to terrorist organizations all around the world...
Gary Whitta said:Analysis of McCain's health plan, truly terrifying:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/o...r=1&scp=2&sq=mccain health&st=cse&oref=slogin
StoOgE said:So, the McCain bounce is dead a week before the debates. The Palin bounce is gone and she now has negative popuarity ratings.
The economy keeps getting worse, the news is worse, people are generally scared, and Mcanti-regulation wants to set up a comitee.
The presidency was decided Monday morning and reinfoced last night.
Apparantly, they're running the full ad though we don't know where.PhoenixDark said:So is that 2min TV ad actually running on TV, or will it be cut to 30sec?
Gaborn said:I'm not sure why that's relevant. Whether this was just an exchange of regular emails or some secret lover scandal or anything in between isn't the point, the point is people had no right to look in the first place and people find it titillating because they want it to bring someone down politically.
Hitokage said:Are you insinuating that she's unfamiliar with security protocol? DID YOU FORGET RUSSIA IS NEXT DOOR TO HER?
StoOgE said:So, the McCain bounce is dead a week before the debates. The Palin bounce is gone and she now has negative popuarity ratings.
The economy keeps getting worse, the news is worse, people are generally scared, and Mcanti-regulation wants to set up a comitee.
The presidency was decided Monday morning and reinfoced last night.
As others have said, by using personal email (and deleting anything incriminating), she may be able to avoid handing over messages that would have been archived and available to the court had she used her official .gov account.Gaborn said:No, you just have people trying to make political hay out of emails that were illegally obtained. Taking advantage of this would be as bad as actually stealing it in the first place.
worldrunover said:You know, Cindy said it, McCain said it, and then Palin said it to Gibson. And NO ONE asked "WTF does that even mean?" Maybe they were flabbergasted that it was being used as credible foreign policy experience of a veep candidate, but seriously; what the fuck does that even mean? Why hasn't anyone asked that yet.
It isn't, really. I'm simply saying that for those of us who aren't part of Anonymous, anything we've seen may or may not be legitimate to begin with, and even if it is, is inconsequential.Gaborn said:I'm not sure why that's relevant. Whether this was just an exchange of regular emails or some secret lover scandal or anything in between isn't the point, the point is people had no right to look in the first place and people find it titillating because they want it to bring someone down politically.
Gary Whitta said:Analysis of McCain's health plan, truly terrifying:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/o...r=1&scp=2&sq=mccain health&st=cse&oref=slogin
worldrunover said:I said wow.
There's no way he can win this election.
Revengeance said:As others have said, by using personal email (and deleting anything incriminating), she may be able to avoid handing over messages that would have been archived and available to the court had she used her official .gov account.
This is shady as hell, and to me, obstruction of justice is absolutely as bad as some kid hacking her account. Also, it represents a Cheney level obsession with secrecy, and I'm ready for some damn transparency.
*shrugs* People just coming around to self-regulation without government interference, I guess.Gaborn said:It's really amazing, people are correctly screaming about the abuses of FISA and under the PATRIOT Act, but they seem generally pleased that people are hacking email accounts?
The medicine tastes bad, doesn't it.Evlar said:Slowly but relentlessly cranking up the outrage machine I see.
GhaleonEB said:
Apparantly, they're running the full ad though we don't know where.
Revengeance said:As others have said, by using personal email (and deleting anything incriminating), she may be able to avoid handing over messages that would have been archived and available to the court had she used her official .gov account.
This is shady as hell, and to me, obstruction of justice is absolutely as bad as some kid hacking her account. Also, it represents a Cheney level obsession with secrecy, and I'm ready for some damn transparency.
GhaleonEB said:
Second in the broadcast network competition to talk to Sarah Palin: Katie Couric.
The CBS anchor will spend two days on the road with the Republican vice presidential candidate as well as presidential hopeful John McCain, the network said Tuesday.
The Lamonster said:Also, the e-mail address was already known to the public, so Palin's people could have gone in and deleted anything questionable.
Gaborn said:Keep in mind considering the source we don't even know if this was actually even HER email account or Anonymous setting up the email account, filling it with these things and then alerting everyone to the hack.
His record with regulation is going to be very significant, I think. It's something he can't run from and just a few weeks ago he was still talking about LESS regulation, not more. Hopefully that's still front and center in a few weeks; we know how compressed the media cycles are these days.StoOgE said:My point exactly, the race is returning to a sense of normalcy, back to where it was a few weeks ago before the conventions. Obama's positives are now higher than they were.
I know the numbers dont show it now, but I'm calling the shot, this race is over as of Monday. McCain cant win and he cant run from his anti regulation record.
Gaborn said:Keep in mind considering the source we don't even know if this was actually even HER email account or Anonymous setting up the email account, filling it with these things and then alerting everyone to the hack.
OuterWorldVoice said:There's nothing to win. I find most of your arguments lacking any and all human empathy except where you talk about embryos. It's not a contest Jay. But if it were, you're welcome to your medal.
Did the internet just cause Sarah Palin to destroy evidence? The potential Veep is in a bit of trouble for using her personal, unarchived email address (gov.sarah@yahoo.com) to conduct state business. Which is, you know, questionable, because it violates public records requests and could stall information gathering in the Troopergate scandal. Now comes word that Anonymous, the fun-loving Internet gadflies based loosely around mostly lawless message board 4Chan, got a hold of the password to another Palin email account: gov.palin@yahoo.com. It all looks legit! The offending posts, screenshots, heretofore unseen family photos, and emails have all been deleted from Imageshack and 4Chan. But we have them. You want to read Sarah Palin's email?