mckmas8808 said:Dude! She didn't fire him because the guy because her ex-brother in law threaten to kill her dad!!!
Educate yourself on this situation.
Were do you reccomend I start.. Maybe the daily kos? Huffington post? Maybe Olberman had something interesting to say about it, or Chris Mathews. I don't watch their stuff so I may have missed something. Maybe I can learn something from the NY times.
I've been mostly paying attention to Limbaugh and Hannity for my news during this campaign.
But seriously, who do I believe? Everybody is saying different things. This seems like a distraction to me. It's definitly taken the shine of Palin and hurt McCain to some extent but It just doesn't seem like a big deal to me. As I stated a few posts up, I think people are making a mountain out of a molehill with this.
And for the record, I don't blame the liberals for exploiting this. It hurts me to see her wounded, because I immediatlley liked her as a choice, and I still do, but this is a presidential campaign, and people are going to make hay when they can.
As I said above, the firing was probably improper from a legal standpoint, but I suspect that she had her reasons.
Miroku said:So, because Wooten may have been a bad person, but was only punished for some of his crimes, this somehow justifies Palin in firing Monaghan? I don't think so. That would be a failure of the legal system and something that Palin has to suck it up and live with. If there were some legal way for Palin or her family to try to get Wooten thrown in jail or fired or whatever she should have pursued it instead of firing an honest man.
Given the scandals of the current administration, especially in the justice department, we cannot afford to have anyone in power who is even anywhere near performing unjust firings. That's why this is a big deal. It reflects on Palin's personality and leadership style in reference to recent events which are beyond the point of absurdity. We simply cannot have someone abusing power like this in office.
That's a pretty reasonable argument I suppose. But honestly, the biggest problem with Bush has been the people he hasn't fired.. All the people that he kept in office even though they had no buisness in their positions, All the shitty people he defended endlessly even though their incompetence was obvious.
Palin has a record of being very very quick to fire people, and I don't think that's nessecarily bad. whether or not this guy deserved to be fired will eventually come out, but I don't nessecarily buy the opposition spin that she's fired an honest guy. Why should I believe them over her?