v1cious said:not to mention everyone who watches Countdown knows he hates Hillary.
He will be respectful and slightly amusing.Cheebs said:Keith HAAAAAATES hillary he isn't going to play nice with her.
PhoenixDark said:There's the paranoia again. If she blows him out and gains a 200,000+ popular vote victory of course it'll be treated as a big victory. But why you guys are scared of the big bad media is beyond me.
Cheebs said:The media narrative for tomorrow is VERY different than March 6th.
March 6th was:
Will Obama end the nomination fight?
April 22nd is:
Can Clinton hold on?
Deus Ex Machina said:Running a campaign is like running a Country. It's an organization, that requires leadership, good people running things and good fiscal management. In fact none of the candidates have ever been a CEO or the chief exec of an organization. These campaigns are the first chance they have to show the public how well they run things.
So based on this performance, which of the three has shown the best leadership ability?
Obama- Flushed with more cash than the other two combined. Has not taken any money from special interests. His campaign has rarely made a mistake and have been consistently on message.
Hillary- Awash in a see of red ink. This campaign has had to retool it's message multiple times. High up people have been repeatedly fired. The campaign made major blunders including thinking all would be over after super Tuesday. It's debt was caused in part by lavious living by the campaign itself.
McCain- Had to retool his campaign and needed a government bail out to prevent it from going belly up. His campaign is run by special interest groups.
Cheebs said:George Bush ran one of the best campaigns in American history in 2000 & 2004. It was done with pure genius and not a single mistake. His campaign was more or less ran perfectly.
Really showed how good of a leader he was huh?
Deus Ex Machina said:Running a campaign is like running a Country. It's an organization, that requires leadership, good people running things and good fiscal management. In fact none of the candidates have ever been a CEO or the chief exec of an organization. These campaigns are the first chance they have to show the public how well they run things.
Cheebs said:George Bush ran one of the best campaigns in American history in 2000 & 2004. It was done with pure genius and not a single mistake. His campaign was more or less ran perfectly.
Really showed how good of a leader he was huh?
Cheebs said:George Bush ran one of the best campaigns in American history in 2000 & 2004. It was done with pure genius and not a single mistake. His campaign was more or less ran perfectly.
Really showed how good of a leader he was huh?
so_awes said:what happened to the old poligaf thread? D:
Great news!GhaleonEB said:New super for Obama.
4-21-08 - Added DNC Enid Goubeaux (OH) for Obama
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-list.html
Come on. Karl Rove knew how to run a campaign. Rove was VERY VERY VERY good at what he did.CowboyAstronaut said:No his campaign wasn't ran perfectly he just had terrible competition and people are complete idiots![]()
Deus Ex Machina said:Running a campaign is like running a Country. It's an organization, that requires leadership, good people running things and good fiscal management. In fact none of the candidates have ever been a CEO or the chief exec of an organization. These campaigns are the first chance they have to show the public how well they run things.
So based on this performance, which of the three has shown the best leadership ability?
Obama- Flushed with more cash than the other two combined. Has not taken any money from special interests. His campaign has rarely made a mistake and have been consistently on message.
Hillary- Awash in a see of red ink. This campaign has had to retool it's message multiple times. High up people have been repeatedly fired. The campaign made major blunders including thinking all would be over after super Tuesday. It's debt was caused in part by lavious living by the campaign itself.
McCain- Had to retool his campaign and needed a government bail out to prevent it from going belly up. His campaign is run by special interest groups.
Instigator said:To be Tamanon, Obama's campaign is full of former lobbyists.
I guess that's an improvement in US politics, but Obama still is knee deep with special interests.
schuelma said:According to Drudge, Hillary's internals show 11 point lead. "Controlled excitement is building" in her inner circle.
v1cious said:don't what? SurveyUSA has never been wrong. you don't think an upset is possible?
in any case, a six point victory is still a win for Obama regardless.
monchi-kun said:but i get the feeling that my interests sits at the same table as the special interests.
CLINTON INTERNALS SHOW 11-POINT LEAD IN PA
Mon Apr 21 2008 11:10:14 ET
**Exclusive**
Controlled excitement is building inside of Clinton's inner circle as closely guarded internal polling shows the former first lady with an 11-point lead in Pennsylvania!
Clinton is polling near to nearly 2 to 1 over Obama in many regions of the state, a top insider explained to the DRUDGE REPORT.
A strong coalition of middle-class and religious voters has all but secured a Clinton victory Tuesday, with headline-making margins, the campaign believes.
"It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of how much," a senior campaign source said Monday morning.
When pressed if the dramatic internal polling numbers could somehow be flawed in a state as demographically complex as Pennsylvania, and with new voter registration surging to unseen levels, the campaign insider held firm.
"Senator Obama would be wise not to unpack his bags quite yet."
MORE
With less than 24 hours to go until the beginning of the end of primary season voting, Obama has handedly captured Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but has failed to dominate suburban sprawl, the campaign's polling reveals.
An 11-point victory in Pennsylvania for Clinton would expand on margins scored in Ohio.
Clinton will quickly move to feverishly focus on Indiana starting Tuesday night, hoping to somehow convince superdelegates that she not only has superior stamina but has crucial swing state appeal.
Without superdelegate intervention, Clinton still faces impossible math to nomination.
Developing...
XxenobladerxX said:So is this good or bad?
:lollopaz said:IT'S NEW HAMPSHIRE IN REVERSE
Again campaigns always downplay expectations. This logic makes no sense.gkrykewy said:Ah, I see. They leaked the 11 point numbers because they're trying to paint that as some amazing, widening margin.
monchi-kun said:Sporsk..what happened? Did you take one for the team (and lose modship) by banning APF?
Cheebs said:Again campaigns always downplay expectations. This logic makes no sense.
Cheebs said:Again campaigns always downplay expectations. This logic makes no sense.
Tom_Cody said:The 100 year lie was not enough, Obama continues to blatantly distort McCain's words:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WynLgJFBxSs
I look forward to the spin.
Tom_Cody said:The 100 year lie was not enough, Obama continues to blatantly distort McCain's words:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WynLgJFBxSs
I look forward to the spin.
Tom_Cody said:The 100 year lie was not enough, Obama continues to blatantly distort McCain's words:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WynLgJFBxSs
I look forward to the spin.
It appears as though his disagreements with the site redesign led him to be demoted for some reason...monchi-kun said:Sporsk..what happened? Did you take one for the team (and lose modship) by banning APF?
RubxQub said:It appears as though his disagreements with the site redesign led him to be demoted for some reason...
Still trying to figure out what that reason is...
RubxQub said:It appears as though his disagreements with the site redesign led him to be demoted for some reason...
Still trying to figure out what that reason is...
harSon said:Mccain was dumb to say "You could make the argument...", there is no argument to be made :lol
Smiles and Cries said:I've been having 40 seconds of loading time for each thread problems but what redesign?