monchi-kun said:i read somewhere that undecides were leaning towards Clinton
The Chuck Todd rule...
add 4% to Clintons numbers.
monchi-kun said:i read somewhere that undecides were leaning towards Clinton
Odrion said:APF is banned? You know that if SD disappears, this whole topic is going to spiral into a boring circlejerk.
gcubed said:The Chuck Todd rule...
add 4% to Clintons numbers.
Agreed. Though, did Clinton seek that endorsement? I subscribe to the Reagan ideal that endorsements/contributions are people signing on to your convictions, not obligating you to take on theirs. But, if she went begging to Mellon-Scaife after all he did to them personally, that seems a little craven.syllogism said:APF was completely right about Mellon-Scaife, though the tenuous Hamas endorsement was a weak comparison.
IIRC, they are very hit-or-miss. But this one seems in line with most; SUSA just pegged the race at 50-44 for Clinton, for example.Jason's Ultimatum said:Are Rasmussen's polls pretty accurate for the most part?
"When Senator Clinton voted with President Bush to authorize the war in Iraq, she made a tragically bad decision that diverted our military from the terrorists who attacked us, and allowed Osama bin Laden to escape and regenerate his terrorist network. It's ironic that she would borrow the President's tactics in her own campaign and invoke bin Laden to score political points. We already have a President who plays the politics of fear, and we don't need another."
grandjedi6 said:Ron Paul is back baby! :lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDnGVJ0gPzI
Ron Paul aired that radio ad in Pennsylvania. I like the guys strategy: Lure McCain into a scence of security and then STRIKE!
There are two types of circle jerks. One in which you sit in a circle and jerk yourself off, the other in which you reach over and jerk the next guy off. Both are pretty creepy.lopaz said:How the hell can a circlejerk be boring? You get jerked.
adamsappel said:APF didn't deserve that ban.
adamsappel said:APF didn't deserve that ban.
Agreed. Though, did Clinton seek that endorsement? I subscribe to the Reagan ideal that endorsements/contributions are people signing on to your convictions, not obligating you to take on theirs. But, if she went begging to Mellon-Scaife after all he did to them personally, that seems a little craven.
Not trying to re-argue it, just curious.
As it happens, yes.monchi-kun said:APF's second GAF account?
Oh shit.Hitokage said:As it happens, yes.
:lol :lol :lolHitokage said:As it happens, yes.
Hitokage said:As it happens, yes.
PWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNTHitokage said:As it happens, yes.
Zeed said:Oh shit.
WAAAIT A FUCKING MINUTE
Tom_Cody is APF??? Tom_Cody? I met that motherfucker in New York! I was talking to APF all that time? Holy shit!
GhaleonEB said:IIRC, they are very hit-or-miss. But this one seems in line with most; SUSA just pegged the race at 50-44 for Clinton, for example.
Obama camp responds to Clinton's last miinute ad (featuring Bin Laden):
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/obama_camp_on_new_hillary_ad_w.php
It's similar to what she did in Texas - drop an ad using fear to drive voters. I'm so sick of this shit. :\
adamsappel said:There are two types of circle jerks. One in which you sit in a circle and jerk yourself off, the other in which you reach over and jerk the next guy off. Both are pretty creepy.
Zeed said:Oh shit.
WAAAIT A FUCKING MINUTE
Tom_Cody is APF??? Tom_Cody? I met that motherfucker in New York! I was talking to APF all that time? Holy shit!
POLITICO.COM PUBLISHES RENDELL-GATE (FARAKHAN)Pennsylvania Governor Rendell Praises Farrakhan
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA
CLINTON BACKING PA GOVENER ED RENDELL ON VIDEO PRAISING LOUIS FARAHKAN
POST THAT PICTURE AGAIN!Zeed said:Oh shit.
WAAAIT A FUCKING MINUTE
Tom_Cody is APF??? Tom_Cody? I met that motherfucker in New York! I was talking to APF all that time? Holy shit!
adamsappel said:APF didn't deserve that ban.
Agreed. Though, did Clinton seek that endorsement? I subscribe to the Reagan ideal that endorsements/contributions are people signing on to your convictions, not obligating you to take on theirs. But, if she went begging to Mellon-Scaife after all he did to them personally, that seems a little craven.
Not trying to re-argue it, just curious.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=7743362&postcount=99RubxQub said:POST THAT PICTURE AGAIN!
wat?!Hitokage said:As it happens, yes.
Zeed said:(he's the guy with the shit-eating grin)
There was alternate account amnesty a while back.... maybe he didn't take advantage of that.harSon said:For that one incident? Perhaps not. But for his constant flame baiting and trolling? Definitely.
Edit: LOL LOL LOL LOL :lol :lol :lol :lol
No man, he was such a cool guy in person. I can't believe that was actually APF!lopaz said:
Now we know the face of the enemy...Zeed said:http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=7743362&postcount=99
![]()
APF, WHY DIDN'T YOU TELL ME????
(he's the guy with the huge ass grin)
That he was trolling wasn't really the problem. Everyone who isn't new understands what he was about, but what really bothered me was his holier-than-thou double-standard.syllogism said:It was pretty obvious he was just trolling and you people kept taking the bait.
syllogism said:It was pretty obvious he was just trolling and you people kept taking the bait. I've to say this Cody character doesn't seem like him at all, however.
Ps. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9558131&postcount=76
Oh, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with trolling, far from it.Hitokage said:That he was trolling wasn't really the problem. Everyone who isn't new knew what he was about, but what really bothered me was his holier-than-thou double-standard.
Wait, so he wasn't APF after all? You're breaking my mind here!Hitokage said:That he was trolling wasn't really the problem. Everyone who isn't new knew what he was about, but what really bothered me was his holier-than-thou double-standard.
syllogism said:It was pretty obvious he was just trolling and you people kept taking the bait. I've to say this Cody character doesn't seem like him at all, however.
Ps. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9558131&postcount=76
A. NeoGAF operates under a closed membership policy. Each accepted member is entitled to one, and only one, username. If you are caught using multiple usernames, you will be subject to immediate and permanent banning. If you wish to change your username, simply notify an administrator (although bear in mind that frequent changes will be frowned upon).
What are the chances Keith will pick up on that tonight?Deus Ex Machina said:POLITICO.COM PUBLISHES RENDELL-GATE (FARAKHAN)
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Rendell_and_Farrakhan.html#comments
ToS says perma-deathed.PhoenixDark said:WTF
He's not permabanned for this is he? If so GAF just lost the brightest, wittiest, and most intelligent poster not named Mandark.
![]()
I think what is being said is that APF really was just faking it for the sake of arguing with people.gcubed said:c'mon now, its politics. Like religion, when its discussed, especially for this long, people take sides and get upset. Just because he pissed you off being in love HRC doesnt mean he isnt a cool person besides his political flaws.
I'm saying that it's still possible the guy in the picture isn't APF, but somebody who is related to APF either by family or residence.Zeed said:Wait, so he wasn't APF after all? You're breaking my mind here!