So you don't think Justin was attempting to be radio friendly?
Just because Justin wasn't successful (or as successful as others) doesn't mean that it wasn't his plan all along. I just can't look at the promo and payola Justin and RCA put into 20/20 (seriously, this project has gotten more promotional backing than probably any other pop album by an act not named Michael Jackson ever. Seriously, ever. They allocated millions to promoting 20/20) and believe that JT wasn't wanting any of his singles to smash the way BL has. He's was clearly going for that level of radio dominance.
They allocated millions to promoting 20/20...
...and were rewarded with massive album sales and enough interest for a world tour from an artist that hasn't released a solo album for seven years. I think you're probably massively overlooking these things when you say, 'oh he didn't get
the most radio-successful single ever, they must be so disappointed, he was obviously aiming for that'.
The singles from 20/20 are not as radio-friendly as JT's old stuff at all, and it's obvious from a first listen. It's part of the reason I'm not as interested in 20/20 as I was in, say, FutureSex/LoveSounds. Listen to Suit & Tie then go back and listen to SexyBack or Rock Your Body. The difference in immediacy, hook and catchiness is immediate.
The album is predominantly 5-8 minute long songs. The
shortest is 4:39. That alone should give you a pretty good clue that the album wasn't intended to generate radio smashes. Then look at Blurred Lines (the album), the
longest track is 4:56. They were clearly aiming for different things.
But again, I'm not sure what your point is, if it's that JT would have liked a massive radio smash then, yeah, I'm sure he would have. But if you look at 20/20 and the single choices (in what kind of parallel universe could Mirrors
possibly have been a radio smash, exactly?), it seems pretty obvious that it wasn't intended to be radio fodder.