The Silver
Member
Trump probably does honestly believe he's truly innocent.
Pretty sure mueller would just deny it. Trump just wants to to seem like he has nothing to hide, exactly what he was doing with Comey which Comey even felt was highly unorthodox.
What possible downside to taking this meeting is there from Mueller's side?
Trump probably does honestly believe he's truly innocent.
He probably never spoke to Russians about helping with the election directly. We have so much dirt on Manafort and Flynn, but we have literally nothing on Trump himself.
"We" as in the general public know his son actively sought the help of Russia. Trump himself definitely knew about it as a result. That's not "nothing."
"We" as in Mueller's team, no one knows what they have on Trump directly.
He probably never spoke to Russians about helping with the election directly. We have so much dirt on Manafort and Flynn, but we have literally nothing on Trump himself.
Trump probably does honestly believe he's truly innocent.
THAT WE HAVE BEEN TOLD. There is a massive difference between what the media knows and what Mueller's team knows; you can count on it.
I'm half-convinced Gutek is a Russian troll that's purposely sewing doubt. All his posts are about how "Trump is invincible, give up, nothing matters, give in to facism"
I feel like upon meeting Mueller, Trump will immediately attempt to fire him.
"This man is investigating me! Very unfair!"
Receipts?
Record it as well. Once he starts talking you know he'll begin to ramble.I hope he incriminates himself despite his lawyers telling him to shut up
I can't tell if you're being sincere or not, but here we go:
1. Jr sets up the meeting promising damaging information about Hilary. A couple days before the meeting, Donald gives a speech where hepromises to announce damaging information about Hilary the following week, which, at minimum, implies he knew Jr might get him some.
2. The day of the meeting, Donald returns to Trump Tower around 2pm. The meeting takes place at 4pm, and Donald tweets after the meeting for the first time ever about Hilary's missing/deleted 30,000 emails. Where'd this nugget of information come from, I wonder. ::thinkingemoji::
3. Trump personally dictated Jr's response to the reports about the meeting, and spoilers, the response was not "it did not happen" but rather it is not a big deal/adoptions.
I'm half-convinced Gutek is a Russian troll that's purposely sewing doubt. All his posts are about how "Trump is invincible, give up, nothing matters, give in to facism"
This is circumstantial evidence at best.
lol your ruse has gotten even sadder over time
Its a familiar tale. Martha Stewart was convicted not of insider trading, but of lying to the feds during their insider trading investigation. Scooter Libby wasnt convicted of leaking Valerie Plames identity; he was convicted of lying to the FBI and the grand jury about it. Marine biologist Nancy Black wasnt convicted of annoying a whale; she was convicted of lying to investigators about whether she annoyed a whale.
Section 1001, the statute criminalizing certain lies to the federal government, is an extremely useful instrument for federal investigators. Its a backstop, a fail-safe, a way to generate a winnable charge even if the underlying investigation is murky or difficult. Federal agents routinely ask questions even though they already know the answer. They might to take an example from one of my clients ask you if you were at a particular meeting even though they have a recording of you at that meeting and witnesses placing you at that meeting. If you lie, youve committed a federal crime.
This is circumstantial evidence at best.
I follow this former prosecutor on Twitter who is always talking about Mueller investigation and always does this amazing threads about all the discoveries.
His opinion is interesting:
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/918449526222016512?
Basically, its better to wait and leave his interview for last. Lawyers want now because Mueller having less info, less of a chance of asking anything too specific and they can deny other interviews later claiming they were already interviewed. Not only that but since we are still in the middle of the investigation, Trump gets to say that it was all fake and he was interviewed and nothing happened etc.
PS - How do you embed tweets?
It also can backfire spectacularly. Who's to say Mueller doesn't have a plethora of circumstantial evidence, and he just needs Trump to confirm a few things? They have been investigating for a year and half now.I follow this former prosecutor on Twitter who is always talking about Mueller investigation and always does this amazing threads about all the discoveries.
His opinion is interesting:
https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/918449526222016512?
Basically, its better to wait and leave his interview for last. Lawyers want now because Mueller having less info, less of a chance of asking anything too specific and they can deny other interviews later claiming they were already interviewed. Not only that but since we are still in the middle of the investigation, Trump gets to say that it was all fake and he was interviewed and nothing happened etc.
PS - How do you embed tweets?
is it happening?
Why would you send a pathological liar to discuss obstruction of freaking justice? You may as well send a pyromaniac to a gasoline store.