I agree it is bad writing. But I still think there was nothing unreasonable with janek making that assumption based on what he saw.Don't you think that was a bit of a stretch?
I mean, he only knows that in one facility on that moon there's some goo that does terrible things to animals it it touches.
And from that he conclude that this is not their home planet but in fact a weapon research facility.
The fact that the goo is a weapon in and by itself seem a bit of a stretch*, let alone his insight about the nature of that planet.
And again, the frustrating thing is that it really wasn't necessarily, I mean, they have a robot who can fucking read and talk the alien's language.
This is just bad writing.
* turns everything into an unstoppable killing machine? that does not sounds like an overly effective weapon to me, but that's a whole different discussion.
Finally going to see this tonight, should I see in it in imax 3D, real 3D, or non 3D?
Nothing wrong with it per se, but way too many otherwise intelligent people took that to be an official explanation of the planet's purpose and the Engineer's overall mission.I agree it is bad writing. But I still think there was nothing unreasonable with janek making that assumption based on what he saw.
Imax 3D or regular 2D.Finally going to see this tonight, should I see in it in imax 3D, real 3D, or non 3D?
I read an interview with Lindelof where he was like 'Shaw makes this assumption that the ship is headed for earth, but she's not necessarily correct in that assumption'... but in the movie David tells her specifically that it's headed for Earth - is there meant to be some ambiguity about this even though David specifically said it to her? I wish I could find it right now...
Hey, do you guys remember the 15 minute trailer before prometheus with the tiger/boy..? Allegedly the tiger/fish(tuna) are all cgi, as well as the water.
I thought the water/fish. But not the Tuna/Tiger...
that was very well done scene. 3D was actuly better than prometheus in that scene. Fish came flying.
Why did the star map point to the planet where the Engineers just stored the black goo?
There's no info from which to even build a theory.
I had no idea the writer was also responsible for Lost. That explains so much.
Also, I've not seen a link in this thread to the Red Letter Media short video on the tubes. Their longer video (on their website) has actual back-and-forth between the two, but this video distills it right down to all the unanswered questions...
I had no idea the writer was also responsible for Lost. That explains so much.
Also, I've not seen a link in this thread to the Red Letter Media short video on the tubes. Their longer video (on their website) has actual back-and-forth between the two, but this video distills it right down to all the unanswered questions...
happyguy23 said:You idiots are all grasping for straws to find a reason to hate on this guy just because Ridley Scott didn't make the movie you wanted. I'm not saying this guy is the greatest writer ever, but some of your complaints are just hilarious.
1) People who say Lost sucks, explain yourself. Lost was never an example of bad writing. If you didn't understand the show, don't blame the writers for not spoonfeeding you everything like a little kid.
2) He didn't write Cowboys and Aliens. He HELPED write it...along with 10 other people. He was around the 5th or 6th writer to polish the script and after that there were 5 or 6 more writers who made edits to his polished script. What appeared in Cowboys and Aliens can't be attributed to him. Do some damn research.
3) People also forget that he worked on Star Trek, which was a highly praised film, but it seems like you all have a selective memory.
happyguy23 said:You also realize that this "hack" writer also gave you the first 5 seasons of LOST which you obviously enjoyed or else you wouldn't have stuck around for the 6th? (which was also not crap)
Not only that, but if you bothered to do some research you'd realize that there were something like 11 writers for Cowboys and Aliens and Damons draft was somewhere in the middle of the editing process. The final script was drastically changed after his inputs were made.
Not that ratings mean everything, but you do realize that the new Star Trek movie has the highest IMDB rating out of all the other Star Trek movies right? Just checking. Also you do realize it's a reboot, right? Just checking.
God you're an idiot.
That makes it even worse.I read an interview with Lindelof where he was like 'Shaw makes this assumption that the ship is headed for earth, but she's not necessarily correct in that assumption'... but in the movie David tells her specifically that it's headed for Earth - is there meant to be some ambiguity about this even though David specifically said it to her? I wish I could find it right now...
Yeah, I was watching the second time for a bit more ambiguity as suggested but there's a specific shot of David saying "Earth.." so it's not vague at all. My memory of the interview might be wrong though.That makes it even worse.
Not in terms of logic but in terms of writing.
"Stringer Bell sacrifices himself to save humanity" is better than "Stirnger Bell jumps to conclusions and kills himself", even with the extra plot holes/jumps in logic.
Also, if even that point is not revealed to us, that makes the whole story have even less of a point.
This shit isn't a teaser, you need to tell a story, you can continue it in the next film if you want, but I strongly believe that a film have to stand on its own legs.
Hahaha!happyguy23 said:Lost was never an example of bad writing.
That robot function as a stopgap to the limitations of the script.Yeah, I was watching the second time for a bit more ambiguity as suggested but there's a specific shot of David saying "Earth.." so it's not vague at all. My memory of the interview might be wrong though.
Yeah, they even make it a dramatic moment. *zoom in* EARTH. *gasp*That robot function as a stopgap to the limitations of the script.
Like, it cannot show or explain anything to us, so David just say it.
Think of the scene where he play with the staramp, couldn't they write it in a way that audience can also get it?
They can do some ominous animations going toward earth, the robot can even talk to himself.
But no, he fondles a globe for 30 seconds then say Earth, because he connected with the ancient computer through the flute or something.
Probably followed Engineer Bill's footprints to get in.Also - how did Shaw get into the ship to get David's head at the end if she needed a rope to get down afterwards? So many things bugging me nowEUGH. This movie.
Also - how did Shaw get into the ship to get David's head at the end if she needed a rope to get down afterwards? So many things bugging me nowEUGH. This movie.
That + the self-driving truck thing were really obvious on a second viewing. That and the Road-Runner escape from the rolling/crashing ship. Ah well, at least it looks goodThat bugged me on the first watch, but really got to me in subsequent viewings. There's no visible way for her to have gotten into the ship.
Watching Alien again and there was some stupid moments too.
"We're putting him in quarantine and thats final!"
"Hes awake"
"Hey man how are you doing lets go eat"
"Shouldnt we scan him first, and what about that quarantine"
"We should go eat first."
But thats 1979, it can be forgiven.
I thought promethues was stupid, so Im definitely not in that camp.Thats 1 moment. Again, Prometheus has 30... and the script is horrible. And the characters don't react to one another. Ever.
Space truckers knew to quarantine.
Scientists didn't.
But, feel free to continue the "BUH BUH BUH Alien had a stupid moment too! So that means its ok for Prometheus to be 2 hours of them." argument.
I thought promethues was stupid, so Im definitely not in that camp.
Also the black guy kept telling everyone 'Why dont we just freeze him.' But no one listened to him. Instead they were content just leaving the face hugger on him all night.
"Why does shaw have staples in her gut?"
I missed David's line regarding Shaw'swhen she was in thefather and how he diedmedical room finding out she was pregnant.
What did he say?
He said a disease's name. As in "(disease's name).. was it?" Cant remember wich.
also this is the unmarked spoilers thread mang
cut to: any other character
"who gives a fuck"
I think we should just leave it really. I dont understand how commedieu and others are in some kind of agenda to make everyone who liked the movie think otherwise. Let us enjoy the film and go watch something you like. Pretty much everything has been discussed, I just dont see the point.
Yeah, I was watching the second time for a bit more ambiguity as suggested but there's a specific shot of David saying "Earth.." so it's not vague at all. My memory of the interview might be wrong though.
would have been better than nothing.
I Don't have a single thing against anyone enjoying the movie. Just the dumbass logic train of trying to highlight SINGLE moments in Alien and Alien that were just as stupid. No, Prometheus was an entire film of them, which is the reason for criticism. People stumble in here saying that the criticism isn't valid, because of one instance in Alien, and recently, Avatar... ;-). People that enjoy the movie try to push some kind of agenda that you aren't allowed to talk about how fucking stupid every single character was, and the lack of a story/script in Prometheus. Since you're callling me out, I've already said the movie was decent. But it had horrible, beyond horrible writing.
This isn't the thread for sheep to put on blinders to people with opposing opinions.
Why counter argue an opinion that the writing was bad, if you truly feel like that is the persons opinion? .
Stay on target. Feel free to defend its horrible writing, by highlighting movies that didn't have horrible writing and characters that interacted with the film we were watching. The characters in Prometheus are stupid as dog food. As an audience member, I simply can't relate enough to get drawn into the film. As every single choice makes you think "what the hell?"
We're just going in circles. Some people think that Alien/s and Avatar had some silly moments as well. Many of the stuff that people dont make sense of in Prometheus has been backed by other people on why it does for them (like Shaw not telling about the alien baby when she's actually in a ship full of crazy people), if it doesnt for you great, but there's no one way to go about it.
Sculli thinks the no-tracking thing in Avatar is a minor thing that cant compare to even the smalles mistake in Prometheus, I think that's BS, but you know what? that's fine, there's no real objectivity in it, it's just opinions. A lot of stuff in Prometheus made sense for me and I enjoyed the film a lot more than many other sci-fi films. I think most responses when comparing to other greats is because people get to the point of claiming some films as PERFECT, wich they are not.
Either way, im not mad at you or anything, but it just seems like some people (not necesarelly you) get physically hurt or something every time someone says "I thought it was great".
you are doing the same thing in reverse.
I know for a fact you can't highlight any moment in Prometheus that was great character interaction. Because it had none.
I thought the Holloway/David conversation at the pool table was great.
I thought the whole secret agenda with Vickers and David was well presented and enjoyed their dialogues.
You didnt. Great. The movie didnt have any great character interaction moments for you.
And btw, your reasoning is pretty pointless since basically no one here is saying Prometheus is better than Alien or Aliens.
No. I say the movie has bad writing. People will then try to sway the opinion by pointing out isolated incidences in Alien. Is this not true? Is this not what this thread has devolved into..? I bring up the bad writing. People then translate that to mean Alien & Aliens were perfect and had no flaws.
Thats 1 moment. Again, Prometheus has 30... and the script is horrible. And the characters don't react to one another. Ever.
Space truckers knew to quarantine.
Scientists didn't.
But, feel free to continue the "BUH BUH BUH Alien had a stupid moment too! So that means its ok for Prometheus to be 2 hours of them." argument.
"Why does shaw have staples in her gut?"
- Never came up.
You made up some idea that people claim Alien and Aliens were perfect. Thats what I was responding to. I know no one is saying Prometheus is better than Alien, Aliens, or Howard the Duck.
PS;
I plain don't like your avatar.
You're not saying anything, you are directly responding to people who express their opinion by going out of your way to say how bad you thought this movie was.
There was no reason for the babbling or calling out Loofy with a "feel free to continue but" speech as if his opinion was immediatly invalid.
You respond to Alien complains by saying "that was 1 moment, Prometheus has thousands!" as if that person was claiming alien was at the same level of prometheus or something
too bad about the mole, people seem to like it
You think I'm crapping on the movie. I am, as the writing is bad. You think I'm attacking people that liked it. That I disagree with. **
Edit;Well I doubt you'd do that since there's no point, but as I said before it just seems that way from some people in this thread.
I know people had high hopes for this and some might be angry that it didnt live up to your expectations, but it's getting silly trying to counter every single opinion.
We are assuming that he's telling the truth. But David showed motives to want to see the crew people killed.
I understand Lidelof's claim, if that's it (I think I read that interview, too). Remember, the Engineers came back 1300 years ago and destroyed nothing. We don't even know if they were intending on doing that at any point. This is all from David's point of view. A robot who used the goo to kill someone to see what it would do. Who got a faux seal of approval to take that step, too.
There's a good chance it's more about David trying to destroy humans (start a war) than anything else.
The fact that the Engineers came back in 680 AD makes everything fucked up, as far as theorizing goes.
What? I missed this.