Alien 3 is worst in terms of fun factor, but the story's development is still better formulated than Prometheus.
Prometheus really has the narrative arc of a TV series.
Man you used to love this movie, theorized like crazy about it
Alien 3 is worst in terms of fun factor, but the story's development is still better formulated than Prometheus.
Prometheus really has the narrative arc of a TV series.
Man you used to love this movie, theorized like crazy about it
Grabbed the 3D version for $20 at Best Buy. I'll probably get a chance to watch it over the weekend. Even if the movie is kind of butt, at least the audio/video quality is good.
I watched this last night. I admit I'm pretty dense, but can someone explain some things to me?
What's up with David? Why did he decide to infect scientist guy so scientist's girlfriend would give birth to squid baby? I thought at first that David was an homage to HAL from space oddesey and felt slighted by his human creators, so he decided to become a creator himself.
Who are the engineers and what's the purpose of the planet? The sense I got was that the purpose of the planet was to infect anyone that came there to create aliens or whatever. The engineer that they wake up and goes crazy killing everyone was just on a ship that got caught there right? Are the engineers even the creators? If they are, why do they kill/infect their own people?
What was the point of the scene at the start? Why did the engineer start killing everybody when they woke him up? Is the ship they use to escape at the end the same ship from Alien?
I thought at first that David was an homage to HAL from space oddesey and felt slighted by his human creators, so he decided to become a creator himself.
Because Weyland told him to "try harder".What's up with David? Why did he decide to infect scientist guy so scientist's girlfriend would give birth to squid baby?
Lindelof's gonna Lindelof.Q: Why did David poison Charlie? Was he hoping he'd impregnate Elizabeth or was that just a nice bonus?
A: In the scene preceding said "poisoning" (but WAS it?), David was chatting with someone in cryo-sleep via headset that we can safely assume is Weyland. If I were a betting man, I'd say something happened in that conversation that very specifically directed David to spike Holloway's champagne. And yes, it was a safe bet that Holloway would have sex with Shaw soon after. Which is why in space, you should always wear a condom!
Engineers are extraterrestrials who seed life here and there for... vague purposes.Who are the engineers and what's the purpose of the planet?
To show how Engineers seed life on planets. Never mind the green. Or what you learned at school regarding natural selection.What was the point of the scene at the start?
Guess he still hates humans.Why did the engineer start killing everybody when they woke him up?
I believe Scott said something about a couple of sequels being needed to lead into Alien, so... possibly?Is the ship they use to escape at the end the same ship from Alien?
No, no those are two seperate impressions. At first when I was watching the start of the movie, the cinematogrophy and David kind of reminded me of HAL, especially later on when he seemingly has alterior motives. Kind of like Ash from Alien.Why would thinking he was an homage HAL make you think this is what he wanted? :/
Wait, wait explain Space Jesus to me. So the engineers want to destroy Earth because Jesus was killed? Where is that even hinted at in the movie? I'm going to need to watch this like multiple times.
Wait, wait explain Space Jesus to me. So the engineers want to destroy Earth because Jesus was killed? Where is that even hinted at in the movie? I'm going to need to watch this like multiple times.
Around 2000 years ago is when Jesus was supposedly killed.
Huh? ...The 2000 year thing suggestion came first from Alien (1979) which took place in 2128 I believe. Not that anyone really counting.
Yeah but well, the space jesus thing is kinda official, probably from the early scripts. It's not a fan theory at all. Sure they can change it after all, but there aren't tons of other events that would lead to the destruction of humanity 2000 years ago.Some people really hate this idea though, for some reason.
The "2000 years ago" thing and various religious references still are in the movie though.Some stupid bullshit that was said once in an interview and people latched onto it. In my opinion, if something's not in a movie, it doesn't exist, so the whole "Space Jesus" thing means absolutely nothing to me.
Some stupid bullshit that was said once in an interview and people latched onto it. In my opinion, if something's not in a movie, it doesn't exist, so the whole "Space Jesus" thing means absolutely nothing to me.
Huh? ...
Yeah but well, the space jesus thing is kinda official, probably from the early scripts. It's not a fan theory at all. Sure they can change it after all, but there aren't tons of other events that would lead to the destruction of humanity 2000 years ago.
And I still feel frustrated that the paintings in those caves lead the team to a planet which harbors a military installation whose sole purpose is to destroy humanity. Where's the logic in that?
Janek sure knows a lot about an advanced sentient species for a pilot with who just landed at one of their sites.
I bet when he left the two dickheads without comms, he was actually going back to his quarters to write the rest of the script.
There's a deleted scene that explains that. He knows/believes it's a military installation that suffered an outbreak because it mirrors a past experience he had himself. He tells the story to Vickers.
Most of the deleted scenes should not have been deleted.
Sounds like the movie I wanted. Wow. David was much more of a robot asshole and it would have made the movie much better.
I dunno, the whole "ancient aliens" premise was very poorly thought-out as well...If they had asked for a complete rewrite in their determination for an original sci-fi franchise and removed every and all Alien DNA from the film, it really could have been something quite special.
I dunno, the whole "ancient aliens" premise was very poorly thought-out as well...
I listed some above.Which part of it that didn't have to tie into any sort of Alien influence seemed poorly thought out?
Yea the ancient Aliens conceit is pretty awful. The entire expedition rests on cave paintings.
Not to mention that if this is a military installation as Janek says, then why are the Engineers inviting humans there via those cave paintings? Evidently their plan is to wipe out the humanity they created, but how is inviting a ship to come to LV-233 going to do that? Am I missing something?
The only way out I'd see would be that it wasn't always a military installation, but I don't think Scott or Lindelof have ever hinted at that possibility. It looks like it's just as Janek says it is, as absurd as it may be.Not to mention that if this is a military installation as Janek says, then why are the Engineers inviting humans there via those cave paintings? Evidently their plan is to wipe out the humanity they created, but how is inviting a ship to come to LV-233 going to do that? Am I missing something?
The only way out I'd see would be that it wasn't always a military installation, but I don't think Scott or Lindelof have ever hinted at that possibility. It looks like it's just as Janek says it is, as absurd as it may be.
In fact, when asked about that, Lindelof actually went "the real question is: was that really an invitation? how fascinating and intriguing! aren't I full of shit!"
Lindelof, Lindelof... Are you saying the Engineers gave human beings those maps (a configuration precise enough that they would find the right place... with only six dots, which is completely ridiculous, but let's say), like, "here's my phone number, but don't get the wrong idea: I don't expect you to ever use it!"?
Not sure why some don't see where I'm coming from when I argue that Lindelof doesn't give a fuck about his scripts or his audience... It's the same poorly thought out bullshit every fucking time.
I'm just mocking it, personally. I don't think I'm the only one either.I both love and hate that we're still debating the crap plot and motivations of everyone involved in Prometheus. It just shows how well the filmmakers did their job in getting us engrossed in this "new" franchise.
Yea the ancient Aliens conceit is pretty awful. The entire expedition rests on cave paintings.
Yeah, if it had been some kind of warning it would have made more sense to paint one of those black goo canisters.The only way out I'd see would be that it wasn't always a military installation, but I don't think Scott or Lindelof have ever hinted at that possibility. It looks like it's just as Janek says it is, as absurd as it may be.
In fact, when asked about that, Lindelof actually went "the real question is: was that really an invitation? how fascinating and intriguing! aren't I full of shit!"
Lindelof, Lindelof... Are you saying the Engineers gave human beings those maps (a configuration precise enough that they would find the right place... with only six dots, which is completely ridiculous, but let's say), like, "here's my phone number, but don't get the wrong idea: I don't expect you to ever use it!"?
Not sure why some don't see where I'm coming from when I argue that Lindelof doesn't give a fuck about his scripts or his audience... It's the same poorly thought out bullshit every fucking time.
Which part of it that didn't have to tie into any sort of Alien influence seemed poorly thought out?
I think things would be very different from a page one rewrite.
Not just that: Holloway calls the six dots a "galactic system" (?) and explains that it has one sun. What. The. Fuck. Just what are those dots, then?The whole "these 5 dots are stars and there is only one cluster of stars that has this exact shape" thing is a little silly. Considering the universe is constantly moving, you would expect those stars to have moved some. Not to mention that this is such a simple shape it pretty much has to exist elsewhere in space.
I'm just mocking it, personally. I don't think I'm the only one either.
I both love and hate that we're still debating the crap plot and motivations of everyone involved in Prometheus. It just shows how well the filmmakers did their job in getting us engrossed in this "new" franchise. Even if we are doing so begrudgingly and with lots of bitter disappointment.
Not just that: Holloway calls the six dots a "galactic system" (?) and explains that it has one sun. What. The. Fuck. Just what are those dots, then?
Oh, and orbiting around that sun is what seems to be a planet. And that planet has a moon capable of sustaining life. In the future, scientists will be using highly advanced Ass-Backwards Sensors that can provide you with detailed information about a moon even as the jury is still out as to whether or not its planet really is a planet.
It's an Alien prequel. That's the only reason why. They artists have the benefit of a built-in audience.
Man Holloway is such a shit character. The leads were poorly cast. Only the supporting players are good (Theron, Fass, Pierce). Pierce makes an even bigger impression in the deleted scenes, and Vickers talks about how terrible he looks. The "bad" make up was entirely intentional. The man has artificially prolonged his life and looks more and more grotesque and unnatural with each passing day. This is one of the few critiques of the movie that miss the point IMO
Watching the 3 hour doc and they talk about how the trilobite is a precursor to the hugger and the deacon the precursor to the Xeno. All of which are the result of mutations that don't really have a purpose. Just the result of cross breeding and generic mutation. Basically the Xeno was biological accident ?