PROMETHEUS UNMARKED SPOILER THREAD!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ha, I was right. The thing behind the head is not only really an altar, it is indeed where the engineer sacrificed himself to generate the black goo which would be used to create the xenomorphs, as shown on the mural.

Sacrificial altar, with bowl. In the movie they replaced it with a green stone??
aK3b1.jpg

Wait, what. Why would they change such a major visual detail in the movie? This really introduces more questions about the altar. If it was originally a bowl like the one from the opening, it would have certain specific implications. But since they deliberately changed it into something else, that implies they want to suggest something different. But instead it's just a random prop in the background which they never bother going back to again. Wut????
 
Just read all of this thread (well...skimmed a lot).

Fun times.

It actually made me dislike the movie, and then like the movie again. That's odd.

I like it despite its many flaws. It's dumb, some shit inexplicable, but it had some really cool set pieces and it was gorgeous.

The Lindelof hate is particularly funny. From duckroll's post it sounds like Spaiht established a lot of the broad strokes already. Which means Ridley had established the broad strokes. We don't really know exactly what Lindelof changed or added or whatever (other than Weyland on Mars).

Anyhoo...fun times, good way to waste three or four days of random browsing.
 
Ether_Snake
妄想妄想妄想妄想妄想妄想妄想

(that's a hell of a leap to make)

It's the same kind of bowl the engineer drank from at the beginning, and.

Ah fuck it, why bother.

Given that the containers resemble canopic jars, perhaps the liquid is the remains, or some essence, of the proto-xenomorph.

Yeah, he killed himself, this creates the black goo to make the xenomorphs, and it was then stored in the jars.
 
Yeah, that kind of stops there, right?

NO

NfE7o.jpg


That+bowl says it all.

Self-sacrifice = new life, in this case xenomorph. Self-sacrifice was done drinking from that bowl.

Pretty clear.
 
Yeah, that kind of stops there, right?

The important detail to take away from that is that in the actual movie, it was some sort of green crystal thing instead. Which means they changed something in production, for some reason, which we will never know about because the movie is such a mess. :(
 
The important detail to take away from that is that in the actual movie, it was some sort of green crystal thing instead. Which means they changed something in production, for some reason, which we will never know about because the movie is such a mess. :(

It even makes sense that the stone was CG. Holloway says, upon touching the BOWL (CG-ed into a meaningless green stone), something like "omg... this is a tomb.". Why would he say that from touching a random green stone? The bowl on the altar makes it much more logical, since it makes the whole setup more familiar with an Earthly tomb.

So this was done AFTER shooting, which means VERY late in production.
 
Maybe there's some hope for the Director's Cut after all. They just need to restore stuff they changed, remove some voice overs, add some new dream sequences, cut some bad scenes.... hey wait, this sounds like another classic Ridley Scott scifi movie I know! Lolol.
 
I think if there was the same bowl on the altar in the actual movie, many people would have naturally made the connection eventually that the mural of the Xenomorph suggests that it is the intended final evolutionary product. It is less important whether the jars were specifically meant to create that directly, but a connection definitely as to be made. Instead right now we are left pondering what the green crystal thing is. :/
 
And now look at this!

HANDS holding the xenomorph. There are TWO creatures, one bigger lifting up the xenomorph. You can see the "greater-xenomorph" above the smaller one, above, on the full shot of the mural.
hGSqY.jpg
 
This is going to be like Kingdom of Heaven isn't it? We're going to get a Directors Cut release that brings back major plot points (that go a long way in explaining things) and make us wonder why the hell was this cut from the film?
 
I think if there was the same bowl on the altar in the actual movie, many people would have naturally made the connection eventually that the mural of the Xenomorph suggests that it is the intended final evolutionary product. It is less important whether the jars were specifically meant to create that directly, but a connection definitely as to be made. Instead right now we are left pondering what the green crystal thing is. :/
I certainly agree that a bowl would (at the very least) have made it look like there actually was something there, some connection to figure out. The decision to change that is somewhat... puzzling.
 
This is going to be like Kingdom of Heaven isn't it? We're going to get a Directors Cut release that brings back major plot points (that go a long way in explaining things) and make us wonder why the hell was this cut from the film?

I'm keeping my expectations extremely low. If they manage to do that, it would be great, but I'm not holding my breath.
 
This is somewhat unclear, especially considering they called the dots a "galactic system" (wut? what are the dots, then?), and said the "system happened to have a sun" (wut? what are the dots, then?).
If I were to try and make some sense of the whole thing, I'd say the dots were stars, and they just picked the one star that looked the most like ours, then focused on a moon of that system that seemed capable of sustaining life (LV-223).

Yeah this is what you're supposed to gather from it, though it was pretty funny the way they explained it.

What they probably should have said is that it's a star system that happens to feature a star similar to our Sun, with a planet and moon orbiting it capable of sustaining life.
 
What they probably should have said is that it's a star system that happens to feature a star similar to our Sun, with a planet and moon orbiting it capable of sustaining life.
Even then, why would a star system be represented with six dots? What are those dots?
 
This green stone change is an interesting revelation. Makes it all the more strange why they decided to change it in post. wtf?!?

Nothing wrong with replacing a deliberate connection to what is otherwise a rather puzzling scene from the beginning of the movie with a random green crystal, you know?
 
I thought Alien Queens aren't part of Ridley Scott's Alien vision?

If he was completely ignoring what Cameron did... wouldn't there also be no "Building Better Worlds"? And no assault rifles and power loaders on the website? Sure that Weyland Timeline could just be Ridley's peons having some fun writing extraneous material that's just fan service, but I'm pretty sure Weyland-Yutani's tagline was introduced in Aliens to go along with the atmosphere processing plot.
 
Maybe the green crystal is like a soulstone from Diablo, and you jam it into your forehead to turn into a Queen.

So after getting his helmet melted off by acid and his face all fucked up, the guy stumbles over to the altar, and stabs the crystal into his head, which explains how he got those super zombie powers? Brilliant!
 
Nothing wrong with replacing a deliberate connection to what is otherwise a rather puzzling scene from the beginning of the movie with a random green crystal, you know?

Ridley Scott and Fox must be PURPOSEFULLY creating flaws in his films now just to build anticipation for the Director's Cut. They seem to be INTENTIONALLY butchering them.

I'll say this...it's ballsy.
 
Did Cameron use Giger in the design of the queen? The mural was also a homage to Giger.

No. The Alien Queen was conceptualized and designed by James Cameron himself, and then the final model for effects was Cameron and Stan Winston. I don't believe Giger was involved at all in Aliens.
 
Another important thing not clear or changed in the movie:

We see one intact sleeping bed, three destroyed ones. This is closer to what I theorized: they never tried to "leave" the planet. They come in the room, three of them go to bed, one sits in the command-deck (specifically names as such in the artbook, not in the piloting chair), and contacts Earth. The piloting chair (described clearly as such in the artbook), never comes out, as can be seen by the fact that it wasn't out when the heros come in the room. The guy just went back to sleep, like the other three, and they waited. But only one survived in the end. There is even another image of a dead engineer with a messed up body, in bed.

edit: woops sorry for giant images
This concept art shows the design of a ship with "hero capsule" as a description for #4. Not sure if this was the one meant to be the one they leave with, or the one with the sleeping jockey.
 
Hey Ether, could you please use quotes around the huge images, especially if you're posting several in a row? I appreciate the pics a lot, but it's making it a bit hard to scroll through the thread. Thanks. :)
 
Haha man I have to catch up on all this wacky Lost-like Prometheus theorizing. Deacon, Trilobite, Hammerpede, wtf. I'm so out of the loop.

Oh, right, I thought of a planetary system, my bad.

I agree with you that it was goofy because they said it was a) a galactic system, and that b) it featured "a sun," though outside of the context of our solar system, sun is just a synonym for star. So it was like they were saying that it's a system of stars that features a star, which I got a chuckle out of.
 
No. The Alien Queen was conceptualized and designed by James Cameron himself, and then the final model for effects was Cameron and Stan Winston. I don't believe Giger was involved at all in Aliens.

You are correct.

If he was completely ignoring what Cameron did... wouldn't there also be no "Building Better Worlds"? And no assault rifles and power loaders on the website? Sure that Weyland Timeline could just be Ridley's peons having some fun writing extraneous material that's just fan service, but I'm pretty sure Weyland-Yutani's tagline was introduced in Aliens to go along with the atmosphere processing plot.

I agree with this.
 
This concept art shows the design of a ship with "hero capsule" as a description for #4. Not sure if this was the one meant to be the one they leave with, or the one with the sleeping jockey.
The latter, I'd say. I believe "hero" is the term used for the one prop the movie focuses on, as opposed to the other, less-detailed background versions of the same object.
 
Haha man I have to catch up on all this wacky Lost-like Prometheus theorizing. Deacon, Trilobite, Hammerpede, wtf. I'm so out of the loop.

Those are all names given to the creatures in the art books, so they're "official" names so to speak. Deacon = the Xenomorph at the end. Trilobite = giant tentacle monster. Hammerpede = alien snake.
 
The latter, I'd say. I believe "hero" is the term used for the one prop the movie focuses on, as opposed to the other, less-detailed background versions of the same object.

Oh ok, makes sense, we can see the dead ones in the other capsules.
 
If he was completely ignoring what Cameron did... wouldn't there also be no "Building Better Worlds"? And no assault rifles and power loaders on the website? Sure that Weyland Timeline could just be Ridley's peons having some fun writing extraneous material that's just fan service, but I'm pretty sure Weyland-Yutani's tagline was introduced in Aliens to go along with the atmosphere processing plot.

Yeah, that's true. It seems unlikely that Scott is looking to retcon the entire series to ignore anything he didn't personally contribute.
 
For what it's worth I had the instant impression the "Deacon" was some sort of proto-queen.
 

Now this would have been a good shot to have in the movie. I was kind of confused watching it how they were in the pyramid/storage building, walking its tunnels, and then ended up on the command centre of the ship.

Also, from Alien:

lgXBj.jpg


I was wondering if there was anything in the original movie that could have been shaped into the sleeping chambers seen on the Engineers' ship in Prometheus, but there's absolutely nothing here that resembles that. If asked, I'm sure Scott or whoever wrote the script would just say, "oh, not every ship has them" but I don't know, I like continuity.
 
I thought Scott said he was going to get Giger to contribute some new stuff for this film? Am I remembering incorrectly, or did he really say this at one time? It seems like all the squids in the film could have used his touch. They were so generic as is. Wished we could have seen some new, or at least unused, stuff from him for this movie.
 
This movie and thread just keep getting better and better. It's been close to a week since I saw the film and can't stop thinking/researching all this stuff.
 
Saw the movie today. Nothing I can say hasn't already been said.
BUT
am I the only one that was pissed that the jockey ship shaw and David pilot at the end flew backwards? Fuck you Ridley you ruined alien for me. That was the front of the ship! :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom