You can think it is and you think this article is relevant and worth the bump, that's fine. I do question why you (especially as someone who already owns a PS5 and was unaffected in April nor is
anyone affected right now considering it's now
cheaper to get a PS5) decided hmm let me bump this thread of all threads to show what unrelated companies are doing to deal with tarrifs.
The article/news was. the thread wasn't on your national broadcaster though. It's the thread he apparently searched for with those terms, not the news.
He said he remembered this thread then he edited his post and said it mentioned Australia so it came up in a search.
Question is why didn't it make him think of a more recent price hike to AUS$849 that happened just this month? Why would he remember the less shocking one from 2 months ago but not the more recent news/thread just this month? I know hero of Spielberg, I know he
prefers xbox so it's not like he just doesn't follow or care about xbox news to have not known or remembered the other. That may not be the case with you for you to have that come to mind when you saw that article.
He was more recently active in that other thread and made a very pertinent post he could have quoted when referencing this article. His search term just being "tarrif" with his username would have shown the most relevant post he could have attached that article to as the top result. An "I told you so" win with it too. Ironically his TLDR summary of that article (which surprise surprise doesn't have the term Australia in it) that he posted here when somebody asked for a TLDR would again have shown his very pertinent post in the other thread as a top result. But alas he decided this is where it goes even though he is now bumping every thread knowing "global brands" in shoe and jewellery don't limit his article to just this thread (could have just started a new general thread about what he believes is happening with price hikes across this industry, he'd be wrong but still at least consistent and without bias).